The Major Factors Influencing on the Financial Performance of the Profit and Loss-Making Hospitals - With Cases of the Provincial Hospitals -

흑자 및 적자병원의 경영성과요인 -지방공사의료원을 중심으로-

  • Jung, Yoon-Suk (Department of Hospital Management, The Graduate School of Gacheon Medical College) ;
  • Jung, Key-Sun (Department of Hospital Management, The Graduate School of Gacheon Medical College) ;
  • Choi, Sung-Woo (Department of Hospital Management, The Graduate School of Gacheon Medical College) ;
  • Jung, Soo-Kyung (Future Hospital Management Consulting Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Lee, Chang-Eun (Future Hospital Management Consulting Co., Ltd.)
  • 정윤석 (가천의과대학 병원경영대학원 병원경영학과) ;
  • 정기선 (가천의과대학 병원경영대학원 병원경영학과) ;
  • 최성우 (가천의과대학 병원경영대학원 병원경영학과) ;
  • 정수경 ((주)미래병원 경영컨설팅) ;
  • 이창은 ((주)미래병원 경영컨설팅)
  • Published : 2001.06.30

Abstract

This study was designed to find out the factors which influence on the financial performance of the hospital. Out of 32 provincial hospitals which were established by the government, 10 hospitals were selected as sample hospitals. Ten hospitals were divided into two groups(5 hospitals each), one of which was profit-making and the other loss-making. The criteria in selecting profit or loss-making hospitals was net profit to total revenue. The major finding of the study was as follows; 1. Whether or not a hospital had specialized in certain departments was proved to be the major factor influencing on the financial performance. Three out of five profit-making hospitals could harvest following results by operating specific departments. (1) Man powers needed for the operation of specific departments were 14.6 persons per 100 bed, which was only 1/7 of the general hospital. (2) The number of doctors has not increased in proportion to the increase of the number of beds. (3) Ratio of total revenue to MD.'s payroll expenses of the profit-making hospitals was 75.0% higher than the loss-making hospitals. (4) The average length of stay of specific department was very long(388.1 days). However, the specific departments were found to have contributed much to the financial performance because the occupancy rate of such departments was very high(94.5%). 2. The headcount per 100 bed of the profit-making hospitals was 23.9 persons(24.0%) less than the loss-making hospitals and the ratio of payroll expenses to total revenue 15.1% less. 3. Averagel revenue per specialist of the profit-making hospitals was 100 million(25.1%) more than loss-making hospitals and the ratio of total revenue to MD's payroll expenses of profit-making hospital was 75.0% higher. 4. Profit-making hospitals have introduced new systems or renovation in 36 fields, such as incentive payment system, utilization of contracted man powers, change of the payroll structure of the nurses, specialization in certain departments, etc; however, loss-making hospitals introduced only 25 new systems or renovations. These kind of renovation could not be achieved without the cooperation of the labor union and the strong will of the top management. Therefore, it could be said that the labor union of the profit-making hospitals seems to have been very cooperative compared with that of loss-making hospitals.

Keywords