DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Identifuication of College Student's And Teacher's Conceptions for Chemical Equilibrium and Equilibrium Shift

화학평형과 평형이동에 대한 대학생과 교사들의 개념조사

  • Published : 2002.06.20

Abstract

A concept test was administered to college students and teachers to identify their understanding of chemical equilibrium and equilibrium shift. The subjects were 53 freshmen in the General Chemistry class, 28 juniors in the Physical Chemistry class and 26 seniors from a university and 10 high school teachers in Seoul. Test items include the calculations of partial pressure and concentration of the gas in the mixture, the equilibrium constant cal-culation and the prediction of equilibrium shift when an inert gas is added to the gaseous reaction system, and the equilibrium concentration calculation and the prediction of equilibrium shift when water or common ion is added to the weak acid solution. The test was focused to identify whether the subjects can predict equilibrium shift using the reaction quotient change for the situations in which Le Chatelier principle is difficult to apply. The results showed that the achievements of teachers and juniors were significantly higher than those of freshmen and seniors. Many stu-dents had difficulties in predicting equilibrium shift using the reaction quotient while they could calculate partial pres-sure and concentration for the same situation. It means they are lack of conceptual understanding of chemical equilibrium shift.

본 연구에서는 화학평형과 평형이동에 관한 대학생들과 교사들의 개념형성 정도를 조사하기 위하여 개념검사 문항을 이용하여 서울지역 대학교 1학년 학생53명, 3학년 학생 28명, 4학년 학생 26명과 고등학교 교사10명에게 지필검사를 실시하였다. 개념검사 문항의 ?뼁育?기체의 부분압력과 농도 계산, 기체상 반응의 평형상수 계산과 비활성 기체 첨가에 의한 평형이동, 약산 수용액에서의 농도 계산과 물 또는 공통이온 첨가에 의한 평형이동에 관한 것으로 르샤틀리에 원리의 적용이 어려운 상황에서 반응지수의 변화를 이용하여 평형이동 방향을 예측할 수 있는가에 초점을 두었다. 응답 내용을 분석한 결과, 교사와 물리화학을 배운 3학년 학생들의 정답률이 일반화학을 배운 1학년 학생들이나 물리화학을 배운지 1년 정도 지난 4학년 학생들보다 유의미하게 높은 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 선수 개념인 부분압력과 농도 계산에 대한 정답률은 높았으나 이와 동일한 조건에서 화학평형이동 방향을 예측하는 문항의 정답률은 낮게 나타나 계산 능력보다는 반응지수를 이용한 평형이동의 예측에 대한 개념 형성이 부족한 것으로 드러났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Wandersee, J. H.; Mintzes, J. J.; Novak, J. D. In Handbookof research on science teaching and learning;Gable, D. L., Ed.; Macmillan Publishing Co.: New York.1994; pp. 177-210.
  2. Pfund, H.; Duit, R. Bibliography: Students' alternative frameworks and science education. Kiel: Institute ofScience Education, University of Kiel. 1993.
  3. Cho, H.-H. Journal of the Korean Association for Researchin Science Education 1984, 4(1), 34.
  4. Quilez-Pardo, J.; Solaz-Portoles, J. Journal of Researchin Science Teaching 1995, 32(9), 939. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320906
  5. Bergquist, W. C.; Heikkinen, H. Journal of ChemicalEducation 1990, 67(12), 1000. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed067p1000
  6. Wheeler, A. E.; Kass, H. Science Education 1978,62(2), 223. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730620212
  7. Park, J.-Y.; Kang, S.; Kim, S.-Y.; Kim S.-H.; Kim, I.-J.;Lee, J.-H. Chemical Education 1993, 20(4), 285.
  8. Park, J.-Y.; Kang, S. Chemical Education 1996, 23(5),335.
  9. Park, S.-Y. A comparative study between the cognitivelevels of general high school students in 2nd grade ofscience major and the demanded cognitive level ofchemistry II textbooks of the 6th curriculum. M.Ed.Thesis, Ewha Womans University. 1997.
  10. Allsop, R. T.; George, N. H. Education in Chemistry1984, 21, 54.
  11. Banerjee, A. C. International Journal of Science Education1991, 13(4), 487. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069910130411
  12. Furio, C.; Calatayud, M. L.; Barcenas, S. L.; Padilla, O.M. Science Education 2000, 84(5), 545. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200009)84:5<545::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-1
  13. Gold, J.; Gold, V. Education in Chemistry 1985, 22, 80.
  14. Gorodetsky, M.; Gussarsky, E. In Proceedings of the 2nd international seminar: Misconception and educational strategies in science and mathematics. Novak, J.D., Ed.; Cornell University. 1987; pp. 187.
  15. Gussarsky, E.; Gorodetsky, M. Journal of Research inScience Teaching 1990, 27(3), 197. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270303
  16. Hackling, M. W.; Garnett, P. J. European Journal ofScience Education 1985, 7(2), 205. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528850070211
  17. Hameed, H.; Hackling, M. W.; Garnett, P. J. InternationalJournal of Science Education 1993, 15(2), 221. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069930150209
  18. Huddle, P. A.; Pillay, A. E. Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching 1996, 33(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199601)33:1<65::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-N
  19. Niaz, M. International Journal of Science Education1995, 17(3), 343. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069950170306
  20. Niaz, M. Journal of Science Education and Technology2001, 10(2), 205. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009481416943
  21. Solomonidou, C.; Stavridou, H. Education and InformationTechnologies 2001, 6(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011359010331
  22. Tyson, L; Treagust, D. F.; Bucat, R. B. Journal of Chemical Education 1999, 76(4), 554. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed076p554
  23. Van Driel, J. H.; de Vos, W.; Verloop, N. Journal ofChemical Education 1999, 76(4), 559. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed076p559
  24. Voska, K. W.; Heikkinen, H. W. Journal of Research inScience Teaching 2000, 37(2), 160. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200002)37:2<160::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-M
  25. Kang, S. A study on the students' conceptions about chemical equilibrium: For the freshman. M.Ed. Thesis, Seoul National University. 1993.
  26. Kim, J. G. Analysis of the students' conception on chemical equilibrium by the level of learning. M.Ed. Thesis, Korea National University of Education. 1994.
  27. Park, M.-A. The study on the chemical equilibrium conceptsof students. M.Ed. Thesis, Chungbuk National University.1993.
  28. Jeong, J. P. An analysis of conception about chemical equilibrium of high school students. M.Ed. Thesis, Korea National University of Education. 1994.

Cited by

  1. A Study of High School Students' Conceptions for Density vol.54, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2010.54.6.809
  2. 고등학생들의 화학반응속도 개념과 화학평형 개념간의 상관관계 vol.50, pp.3, 2002, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2006.50.3.247
  3. 화학 평형 이동시 반응 속도 변화에 대한 고등학생들의 이해 조사 vol.51, pp.4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2007.51.4.365
  4. Using a Systems Thinking Approach and a Scratch Computer Program To Improve Students’ Understanding of the Brønsted-Lowry Acid-Base Model vol.96, pp.12, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00210