DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Assigning Cognitive Roles in Small-Group Discussion for Science Concept Learning

과학 개념 학습을 위한 소집단 토론에서 인지적 역할 부여의 효과

  • Noh, Tae-Hee (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kang, Suk-Jin (Center for Educational Research, Seoul National University) ;
  • Han, Su-Jin (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Han, Jae-Young (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jeon, Kyung-Moon (Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation) ;
  • Seung, Eul-Sun (Dang-Gok High School)
  • Published : 2002.02.20

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of assigning cognitive roles, a method that may promote verbal interaction in knowledge-building processes, in small-group discussion for science concept learning. Two classes (62 students) of 7th-graders respectively received a concept learning instruction through small-group discussion with assigned cognitive roles (CR) asking to explain and contradict one's idea and to synthesize and conciliate group's idea, and a concept learning instruction through small-group discussion with no specific assigned roles (NSR), for 9 class periods. After the instructions, the tests of achievement, conceptions, the perceptions on science learning environments, and the perceptions toward small-group discussion were administered. ANCOVA results revealed that low-achievers in the NSR group performed significantly better than those in the CR group. Similar tendency was also found in the scores of the conceptions test. Two groups did not differ significantly in the perceptions on science learning environments and toward small-group discussion.

본 연구에서는 과학 개념 학습을 위한 소집단 토론에서 지식구성 과정에서의 언어적 상호작용을 촉진하기 위한 방안으로 인지적 역할 부여의 효과를 조사하였다. 중학교 1학년 학생 62명을 대상으로 설명, 반박, 정리, 조정 활동을 촉진하는 인지적 역할을 부여한 소집단 토론 수업(CR)과 특정한 역할을 부여하지 않은 소집단 토론 수업(NSR)을 9차시 동안 실시하였다. 수업 처치 후, 학업 성취도, 개념 이해도, 과학 학습 환경에 대한 인식, 토론에 대한 인식 검사를 실시하였다. 이원 공변량 분석 결과, 학업 성취도 점수에서 사전 성취 수준 하위 학생들의 경우 NSR 집단이 CR 집단보다 점수가 유의미하게 높았다. 개념 검사에서도 유사한 경향성이 나타났다. 과학 학습 환경 인식과 토론에 대한 인식 검사 점수에서는 집단 간에 유의미한 차이가 없었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ross, J. A.; Raphael, D. Journal of Curriculum Studies1990, 22, 149. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027900220204
  2. Cohen, E. G. Review of Educational Research 1994,64, 1. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064001001
  3. Lumpe, A. T. School Science and Mathematics 1995,95, 302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb15788.x
  4. Heller, P.; Hollabaugh, M. American Journal of Physics 1992, 60, 637. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17118
  5. Alexopoulou, E.; Driver, R. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1996, 33, 1099. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199612)33:10<1099::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-N
  6. 강석진;한수진;정영선;노태희 한국과학교육학회지 2000, 21, 279.
  7. Yager, S.; Johnson, D. W.; Johnson, R. T. Journal of Social Psychology 1985, 129, 389.
  8. Lumpe, A. T.; Staver, J. R. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1995, 32, 71. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320108
  9. Brown, A. L.; Palincsar, A. S. In Knowing, Learning, and Instruction; Resnick, L. B., Ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.: Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1989: p 393-451.
  10. Hogan, K. International Journal of Science Education1999, 21, 855. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290336
  11. 강석진; 노태희 한국과학교육학회지 2000, 20, 250.
  12. Taylor, P. C.; Fraser, B. J.; Fisher, D. L. International Journal of Educational Research 1997, 27, 293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(97)90011-2
  13. Dillon, J. T. Using discussion in classroom; Open University Press: Buckingham, UK, 1994.
  14. Arends, R. I. Learning to teach; 3rd Ed.; McGraw-Hill:New-York, 1994.
  15. 조희형; 박승재 과학 교수-학습; 2nd Ed.; 교육과학사:서울, 1999.
  16. 노태희; 강석진; 김혜정; 채우기; 노석구 한국과학교육학회지 1997, 17, 179.
  17. O’Donnell, A. M.; Dansereau, D. F. In Interaction in Cooperative Groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning; Hertz-Lazarowitz, R.; Miller, N., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: New York, 1992; p 120-141.
  18. 강석진; 김창민; 노태희 한국과학교육학회지, 2000, 20, 353.
  19. Good, T. L.; Reys, B. J.; Grouws, D. A; & Mulryan, C. M. Educational Leadership 1990, 47, 56.
  20. Gillies, R. M.; Ashman, A. F. Journal Educational Psychology1998, 90, 746. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.746
  21. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. International Journal of Educational Research 1989, 13, 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90020-7

Cited by

  1. 중학생의 과학 탐구 활동에서 역할 부여가 언어적 상호작용의 유형 변화와 양상에 미치는 영향 vol.44, pp.2, 2002, https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2020.44.2.167