Epidemiologic study on Systemic Contact Dermatitis Due to Ingestion of Rhus

옻닭에 의한 전신성 접촉피부염의 역학적 연구

Yun, Seok-Kweon;Ko, Ki-Bong;Song, Il-Moon;Choi, Seon-Phil;Ihm, Chull-Wan
윤석권;고기봉;송일문;최선필;임철완

  • Published : 20020300

Abstract

Background : Dermatitis occurring after ingestion of the urushiol chicken is quite common in Korea. Although many cases of the systemic contact dermatitis due to urushiol chicken have already been reported, systemic study on its epidemiology is not done yet. Objective : To elucidate the demography of the eaters of the urushiol chicken with its general understandings in society and the incidence of the resultant systemic dermatitis. Methods : By the help of the patients who developed the dermatitis, all the persons who ate it together with the patients were interviewed. Results & Conclusion : 1. 171 eaters of the urushiol chicken(125 male and 46 female) were enrolled in this study(M:F = 3.1:1). The age group in 4th decade was the most common in male, the 5th decade in female. The age prevalence of the systemic contact dermatitis corresponded to the age prevalence of the eater. 2. Incidence rate of systemic contact dermatitis among the eaters was 32.2%(55/171). Incidence rate according to each age group were as follows : 0% in 2nd decade, 33.3% in the 3rd decade, 32.4% in 4th decade, 32.8% in 5th decade, 33.3% in 6th decade, 25% in the 7th decade. 3. One third(57/171) of the eaters ate the urushiol chicken to strengthen their internal organs, especially stomach, which they believed to be weak 70 persons(40.9%) ate it at home, 101 persons(59.1%) ate it at a restaurant. 4. Out of 67 persons having past history of allergic contact dermatitis to Rhus tree, 28 persons(41.8%) showed systemic contact dermatitis. Out of 104 persons without past history of allergy to Rhus, 27 persons(26.0%) showed contact dermatitis.

Keywords

References

  1. 한국 브리태니커회사 편집개발실. 브리태니커 세계 대백과사전 Yol 21. 서울:웅진출판사,1996:41
  2. 정보섭,신민교. 도해 향약대사전(식물편). 서울. 영림출판사,1990:382-384
  3. Rietsche1 RL, FowlerJF JI. Fisher' s Contact Dennatitis. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000:89-108
  4. Park SD, Lee SW,Chun JH, Cha SH. Clinical features of 31 patients with systemic contact dennatitis due to the ingestion of Rhus(lacquer). Br J Dennatol 2000;142:937-942
  5. Mancuso G, Masara N. Contact urticaria and severe ana phylaxis from rifamycin SY. Contact Dennatitis 1992;27:124-125 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1992.tb05231.x
  6. 허준. 대역 동의보감 서울. 법인문화사,1999:212
  7. 김창민 중약대사전. 서울: 정담,1998:176-263
  8. 국홍일,우태하 칠과식물(윷나무)에 의한 과민성 설험. 대피지 1971;9:9-14
  9. 박기범,은희철,이유산. 윷나무와 은행나무 헝원의 감작 빈도에 관한 연구. 대피지 1986;24:22-27
  10. 大岩久美子, 吉田 眞里, 松永 佳世子, 小林 美惠, 早川 律子. ウルシおよび毒ヅ夕のパツチテスト 反応. 皮膚 1982;24:232-237
  11. Tanner TL. Rhus(Toxicodendron) dennatitis. Prim Care 2000;27:493-502 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4543(05)70209-8
  12. Zhai H, Chang YC, Singh M, Maibach HI. Patch testing versus history in poison ivy/oak dennatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1997;36:226 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1997.tb00276.x
  13. Epstein WL. Occupational poison ivy and oak dennatitis. Dennatol Clin 1994;12:511-516
  14. 은희철. 한국에서의 접촉피부염에 관한 임상 및 역학적 고찰. 대피지 1995;33:209-224
  15. 김용준,서성준,김명남,홍창권,노병인. 윷닭에 의한 진신성 접촉피부염 6예. 대피지 1995;33 부록1:73
  16. Fisher AA. Poison ivy/oak dennatitis. Part I: Prevention- soap and water, topical barriers, hyposensitization. Cutis 1996;57:384-386