A Study on the Hearing Recovery Patterns in Sudden SensorineuralHearing Loss Patients

돌발성 난청 환자에서 청력 변화에 대한 연구

Lee, Jun-Gyu;Seo, Deok-Jung;Jo, Hyeong-Ho;Jo, Yeon;Kim, Haeng-Jae;Jo, Yong-Beom
이준규;서덕중;조형호;조연;김행재;조용범

  • Published : 20020000

Abstract

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss is a disease that is developed within several hours to several days, but its etiology is not verified yet. Therefore, no specific regimen is available for the treatment of this disease. The purpose of this study is to seek the therapeutic effect of the corticosteroid on the sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients through many variables known as prognostic factors. The author also tried to find a relationship between the hearing recovery patterns and the prognostic factors that were not established yet. Materials and Method:Clinical analysis was performed in 173 patients with sudden hearing loss admitted in Chonnam National University Hospital from January 1996 to July 2001. Results:Recovery was seen in 104 cases out of 173 cases, with the total recovery rate of 60.1%. Patients who had been treated within a week after the symptoms had a better recovery rate than those treated after a week (p$\leq\alpha$0.05). The recovery rate was better for the moderate-severe, and severe hearing loss (p$\leq\alpha$0.05). Patients of all audiograms except the profound one had a better recovery rate (p$\leq\alpha$0.05). Among the patients who had been treated within a week, the dizzy patients had the lower recovery rate than the non-dizzy patients (p$\leq\alpha$0.05). Other factors such as age and sex, tinnitus and ear fullness as accompanying symptoms, the site of disease, and the presence of underlying disease were not related with prognosis. Conclusion:The recovery rate was better in patients who had been treated within a week, and for those whose hearing was moderate-severe and severe, and their audiogram upsloping, V-shape, flat, and downsloping, and who were not dizzy. (Korean J Otolaryngol 2002;45:656-61)

Keywords

References

  1. Kimura R, Perlman HB. Extensive venous obstruction of the la-byrinth. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1956;65:332-50
  2. Bordley JE, Brookhouser PE, Worthington EL. Viral infections and hearing: A critical review of the literature, 1969-1970. Lary-ngoscope 1972;82:557-77
  3. Gussen R. Sudden hearing loss associated with cochlear membr-ane rupture. Arch Otolaryngol 1981;107:598-600
  4. Simmons FB. Theory of membrane breaks in sudden loss. Arch Otolaryngol 1968;88:41-8
  5. Wilkins SA, Mottox DE, Lyles A. Evaluation of a 'shotgun' re-gimen for sudden hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;97:474-80
  6. Byl FM. Seventy-six cases of presumed sudden hearing loss oc-curing in 1973: prognosis and incidence. Laryngoscope 1977;87:817-25
  7. Mattox DE, Simmons FB. Natural history of sudden sensorine-ural hearing loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1977;86:463-80
  8. Sheehy JL. Vasodilator therapy in sensorineural hearing loss. Laryngoscope 1960;70:885-914
  9. Yagi N, Fisch U, Murata K. Perilymphatic oxygen tension and vasoactive drugs. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1978;87:364-70
  10. Lim HS, Kim HN, Kim GR, Chung MH, Shim YJ. A clinical an-alysis of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Korean J Otolaryngol 1986;29:191-200
  11. Chon KM, Roh HJ. The presumptive factors concerning progno-sis of sudden deafness. Korean J Otolaryngol 1988;31:250-8
  12. Wilson WR, Julianna GA. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss. In: Cummings CW, Fredrikson JM, Harker LA, Krause CJ, Schu-ller DE, editors. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book;1993. p.3103-12
  13. Siegel LG. The treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural he-aring loss. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1975;8:467-73
  14. American National Standards Institute. Specifications for audi-ometers. New York: American National Standard Institute, Publ. No. ANSI S3.6-1969, 1970