Development and Test of an Information Needs Scale for Outpatients Undergoing Chemotherapy

Lee, Eun-Hyun;Choi, Jin-Hyuk;Lim, Ho-Yeong;Seo, Mi-Sook;Kim, Hugh C.

  • Published : 20020000

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop and test an Information Needs Scale for Korean outpatients undergoing chemotherapy (INS-C). Materials and Methods: Thirty-three items of the INS-C had content validity based upon findings in the literature and the experiences of expert oncology physicians and nurses. Each item consisted of a five-point Likert scale from 1 (don´t want to know) to 5 (want to know very much). The items were administered to 175 Korean outpatients undergoing chemotherapy. The data obtained was analysed using a factor analysis for construct validity and Cronabch´s alpha for internal consistent reliability. Results: From the factor analysis, six subscales were derived significantly. The six subscales explained 64.62% of the variance. The subscales were named Side-Effects/ Investigative Tests (9 items), Spread of Disease (4 items), Financial Cost (2 items), Treatment (7 items), Activities/ Eating (6 items), and Interrelationships/Support (5 items). The Cronbach´s alpha of the total INS-C was .95, and the alpha of the subscales ranged from .77 to .91. Conclusion: The present study suggests that the INS-C is a reliable and valid instrument to measure the information needs of outpatients undergoing chemotherapy. Health professionals caring for patients with cancer should assess the informational needs of their patients using a reliable and valid instrument and be prepared to provide accurate information.

Keywords

References

  1. Lazarus R, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer, NY, 1984
  2. Christman N. Uncertainty and adjustment during radiotherapy. Nurs Res 1993;39:17-20
  3. Johnson JE, Lauver D, Nail LM. Process of coping with radiation therapy. J Consult Clin Psycho 1989;57:358-364 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.57.3.358
  4. Dodd ML, Ahmed N. Preference for types of information in cancer patients receiving radiation therapy. Cancer Nurs 1987; 10:244-251
  5. Mischel M. The measurement of uncertainty and stress in illness. Nurs Res 1984;30:258-263
  6. Dodd MJ. Efficacy of proactive information on self-care in chemotherapy patients. Patient Educ Couns 1988;11:215-225 https://doi.org/10.1016/0738-3991(88)90021-3
  7. Rainy LC. Effects of preparatory patient education for radiation oncology patients. Cancer 1985;56:1056-1061 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19850901)56:5<1056::AID-CNCR2820560516>3.0.CO;2-Z
  8. Johnson IA, Adelstein DJ. The use of recorded interviews to enhance physician-patients. J Cancer Educ 1991;6:99-102 https://doi.org/10.1080/08858199109528098
  9. Hagopian GA. The effects of a weekly radiation therapy newsletter on patients. Oncol Nurse Forum 1991;18:1199-1203
  10. Rainey LC. Effects of preparatory patient education for radiation oncology patients. Cancer 1985;56:1056-1061 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19850901)56:5<1056::AID-CNCR2820560516>3.0.CO;2-Z
  11. Frank-Stromborg M, Olsen SJ. Instruments for clinical healthcare research (2nd ed.). Jones and Bartlett, Boston, 1997
  12. Fieler VK, Wlasowicz GS, Mitchell ML, Jones LS, Johnson JE. Information preferences of patients undergoing radiation therapy 1996;23:1074-1086
  13. Goldberg RJ, Guadagnoli E, Silliman R, Glickman A. Cancer patients' concerns: congruence between patients and primary care physicians. J Cancer Educ 1990;5:193-199 https://doi.org/10.1080/08858199009528064
  14. Galloway S, Graydon J, Evans-Boyden B, Palmer-Wickham S, Burlein-Hall S, Rich-van der Bij L, West P, Blair A. Informational needs of women with a recent diagnosis of breast cancer. J Adv Nurs 1997;25:1175-1183 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.19970251175.x
  15. Pedhazur EJ, Schmelkin LP. Measurement, design, and analysis. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1993
  16. Nunnally J, Burnstein I: Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). NewYork, McGraw-Hill, 1994
  17. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). Northridge CA, Harper Collines, Colleague Publishers, 1996
  18. Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER. Measurement in nursing research (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, FA Davis, 1991
  19. Degner LF, Davison BJ, Sloan JA, Mueller, B. Development of a scale to measure information needs in cancer care. J Nurs Measure 1998;6:137-153
  20. Wallberg B, Michelson H, Nystedt M, Bolund C, Deger LF, Wilking N. Information needs and preferences for participation in treatment decisions among Swedish breast cancer patients. Acta Oncol 2000;39(4):467-476 https://doi.org/10.1080/028418600750013375
  21. Luker KA, Leinster SJ, Owens RG. Information needs and sources of information for women with breast cancer: A follow- up study. J Adv Nurs 1996;23:487-495 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb00010.x
  22. Davison BJ, Degner LF, Morgan TR. Information and decisionmaking preferences of men with prostate cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 1995;22:1401-1408
  23. Wingate A, Lackey N. A description of the needs of noninstitutionalized cancer patients and their primary caregivers. Cancer Nurs 1989;12:216-225
  24. Oh DY, Kim M, Choi I, Joh Y, Kim B, Kim DY, Kim JH, Lee SH, Kim TY, Heo DS, Bang YJ, Kim NK. Discrepancies of the values on the withholding futile interventions between physician and family members of terminal cancer patients. Cancer Res Treat 2001;33(4):350-356 https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2001.33.4.350