Korean Public Administration Review (한국행정학보)

The Korean Association for Public Administration (한국행정학회)
권호 표지

Restructuring of Development Administration: Policy Implications of Modern Development Theories

발전행정론의 재구성을 위한 시론 - 현대 발전이론의 이론적 시사점과 발전전략적 함의를 중심으로

Lee, Do-Hyeong
이도형

  • Published : 20020000
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Globalization and economic change raises the spectre of global problems such as inequality, unemployment, involuntary structural adjustment, foreign debt, environmental disruption and neodependency. In the age of globalization, many countries face the necessity of modifying existing development plans and creating new national development strategies. In order to identify effective ways to restructure Development Administration and to suggest new national development strategies, this paper focuses on three areas. First, this paper analyzes recent global problems and discusses the necessity of restructuring Development Administration. Second, the paper builds up new theoretical foundations for Development Administration by analyzing modern development theories such as reflexive modernization, environmentally sound and sustainable development, globalisierung zweiter ordrung, and governance theory. Third, the research delineates the contents and methods of new national development strategies based on an analysis of their theoretical and policy implications.

현 무한경쟁과 자본세계화의 흐름은 사회경제적 불평등, 국가간 빈부격차, 타율적 구조조정, 외채, 실업문제, 환경파괴 등 새로운 차원에서의 범지구적 문제들을 제기하며, 국가발전에 대한 새로운 연구 필요성과 함께 각국 정부가 세계화에 적절히 대응하기 위한 발전전략 논의를 재론케 한다. 이런 점에서 1960-70년대식의 단선 근대화론적 발전행정과는 질적으로 다른 새로운 발전내용과 발전방법으로 무장된 발전행정론의 재구성과 함께 국가의 적정역할에 대한 논의가 다시 시작될 필요가 있겠다. 이 글은 이러한 문제인식 아래, 오늘의 세계화 시대에서 발전행정적 논의의 재구성이 왜 필요한지를 자본세계화 과정에서의 신종속 상황을 치유하기 위한 관리적 세계화라는 개념을 중심으로 자세히 논해 보았다. 또 그 연장선상에서 우리가 새로운 발전행정론을 재구성하는 데 있어 참고할 만한 현대 발전이론들, 특히 Hettne 등의 또 다른 발전, Beck의 재귀적 근대화, 하위정치, 초국민적 국가, Apel의 2차적 세계화 개념을 중심으로, 이들 현대 발전이론이 발전행정론의 재구성을 위한 이론적 토대로서 어떻게 연결되며 또 자본세계화에의 대응전략으로서 어떤 구체적 함의를 갖는지를 ‘발전전략의 내용구성’ 측면에서 살펴보았다. 마지막으로 관주도적 발전의 폐해를 극복하고 ‘발전방법과 발전주체의 재구성’을 시도한다는 측면에서 거버넌스 개념의 발전전략적 함의와 도입 필요성에 대해 논했다.

Keywords

References

  1. 문정인. (1996).세계화의 위협구조와 국가전략: 신중상주의의 가능성과 한계. 김경원 . 임현진 공편, "세계화의 도전과 한국의 대응", 325-354.서울:나남
  2. 박동서 외.(1986). "발전행정론(제2전정판)".서울:법문사
  3. 송재복.(2000). "한국 발전행정론: 제도,국가,성장/위기". 서울:대왕사
  4. 이삼열.(1999).세계화의 불안과 세계시민적 이성."철학과 현실", 겨울호:62-80
  5. 이송호.(2000).비교,발전행정 분야 교과서 분석과 향후과제. "한국행정학보", 34(4):365-374
  6. 임현진.(1998)."지구시대 세계의 변화와 한국의 발전". 서울:서울대학교 출판부
  7. 임현진.(2001). "21세기 한국사회의 안과 밖". 서울:서울대학교 출판부
  8. 정수복.(1997).생명가치를 지향하는 사회과학의 새 패러다임."동향과 전망",가을호:262-278
  9. 주성수.(2000)."글로벌 거버넌스와 NGO".서울:도서출판 아르케
  10. Beck, Ulrich. (1995). Ecological Enlightenment: Essays on the Politics of the Risk Society(trans. by Mark Ritter). N. Y.: Humanities
  11. Beck, Ulrich, (1998a). Democracy without Enemies(trans. by Mark Ritter). Cambridge: Polity Press
  12. Beck, Ulrich. (1998b)."정치의 재발견", 문순홍(역). 서울: 거름; The Reinvention of Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996
  13. Beck, Ulrich. (2000). "지구화의 길: 새로운 문명의 가능성이 열런다", 조만영(역). 서울: 거름; What is Globalization?. Cambridge:Polity Press, 2000
  14. Bergsten. C. Fred. (1998). American Trade Leadership and the Global Economic System. In Bruce Stokes et. a1.(eds.), Future Visions for U. S. Trade Policy. N. Y.: Council on Foreign Relations
  15. Brohman, John. (1996). Popular Development: Rethinking the Theory and Practice of Development. Cambridge, Mass.:Blackwell
  16. Dwivedi, 0. P. & Nef, J. (1982). Crises and Continuities in Development Theory and Administration: First & Third World Perspectives. Public Administration and Development. 2:59-77 https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.4230020106
  17. Ghosh, B. N. (2001a). Dependency Theory Revisited. Aldershot: Ashgate Pub
  18. Ghosh, B. N. (2001b). Development in Development Economics. In B. N. Ghosh(ed.), Contemporary Issues in Development Economics, 1-15. London: Routledge
  19. Goulet, Denis. (1997). Development Ethics: a New Discipline. International Journal of Social Economics. 24(11): 1160-1171 https://doi.org/10.1108/03068299710193543
  20. Goulet, Denis. (2002). What is a Just Economy in a Globalized World? International Journal of Social Economics. 29(1/2): 10-25 https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290210412958
  21. Haque, M. Shamsul. (1999). Restructuring Development Theories and Policies: A Critical Study. Albany: State University of New York Press
  22. Henderson, Hazel. (1995). Paradigm in Progress: Life Beyond Economics. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Pub
  23. Hettne, Bjorn. (1990). Development Theory and the Three Worlds. Essex: Longman Scientific & Technical
  24. Jun, Jong S. (2000). Transcending the Limits of Comparative Administration. Administrative Theory and Praxis. 22(2): 273-286 https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2000.11643451
  25. Kliksberg, Bernado. (2000). Rebuilding the State for Social Development : Towards Smart Government. International Review of Administrative Sciences. 66: 241-257 https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852300662002
  26. Langhelle, Oluf. (1999). Sustainable Development: Exploring the Ethics of Our Common Future. International Political Science Review. 20(2): 129-149 https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512199202002
  27. Midgley, James. (1995). Social Development: The Developmental Perspective in Social Welfare. London: Sage Pub., Ltd
  28. Mouzelis, Nicos. (1994). The State in Late Development: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, In David Booth(ed.), Rethinking Social Development: Theory, Research & Practice, 126-151. Longman Group Ltd
  29. Munck, Ronaldo. (1999). Deconstructuring Development Discourse: Impasses, Alternatives and Politics, In Ronald Munck & Denis 0' Hearn(eds.), Critical Development Theory: Contribution to a New Paradigm, 196-210. London: Zed Books
  30. Riggs, F. (1966). The Idea of Development Administration: A Theoretical Essay. Comparative Administration Group
  31. Rodrik, Dani. (1997). Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics
  32. Sadar, Ziauddin. (1999). Development and the Locations of Eurocentrism. In Ronald Munck & Denis 0' Heam(eds.), Critical Development Theory: Contribution to a New Paradigm, 44-62. London: Zed Books
  33. Sandler, Todd. (1997). Global Challenges: An Approach to Environmental, Political and Economic Problems. Cambridge University Press
  34. Schachter, Hindy Lauer. (1995). Reinventing Government or Reinventing Ourselves: The Role of Citizen Owners in Making a Better Government. Albany: State University of New York Press
  35. Sorensen, Eva. (2000). Democratic Governance and the Changing Role of Users of Public Services. Administrative Theory and Praxis. 22(1): 24-44 https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2000.11643424
  36. Sutcliffe, Bob. (1999). The Place of Development in Theories ofImperialism and Globalization. In Ronald Munck & Denis 0' Hearn(eds.), Critical Development Theory: Contribution to a New Paradism, 135-154. London: Zed Books
  37. Thynne, Ian. (2000). The State and Governance: Issues and Challenges in Perspective. International Review of Administrative Sciences. 66: 227-240 https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852300662001
  38. Trainer, Ted. (2000). Two Common Mistakes about Globalization. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. 20(11/12): 46-58 https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330010789278
  39. Tucker, Vincent. (1999). The Myth of Development: A Critique of a Eurocentric Discourse, In Ronald Munck & Denis 0' Hearn(eds.), Critical Development Theory: Contribution to a New Paradigm, 1-26. London: Zed Books
  40. Watts, Michael. (1995). A New Deal in Emotions: Theory and Practice and the Crisis of Development. In J. Crush(ed.), Power of Development, 44-62. N. Y.: Routledge