DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Segmenting Inpatients by Mixture Model and Analytical Hierarchical Process(AHP) Approach In Medical Service

의료서비스에서 혼합모형(Mixture model) 및 분석적 계층과정(AHP)를 이용한 입원환자의 시장세분화에 관한 연구

  • 백수경 (인제대학교 보건대학원 병원경영학과) ;
  • 곽영식 (대우경제연구소 마케팅전략팀)
  • Published : 2002.06.01

Abstract

Since the early 1980s scholars have applied latent structure and other type of finite mixture models from various academic fields. Although the merits of finite mixture model are well documented, the attempt to apply the mixture model to medical service has been relatively rare. The researchers aim to try to fill this gap by introducing finite mixture model and segmenting inpatients DB from one general hospital. In section 2 finite mixture models are compared with clustering, chi-square analysis, and discriminant analysis based on Wedel and Kamakura(2000)'s segmentation methodology schemata. The mixture model shows the optimal segments number and fuzzy classification for each observation by EM(expectation-maximization algorism). The finite mixture model is to unfix the sample, to Identify the groups, and to estimate the parameters of the density function underlying the observed data within each group. In section 3 and 4 we illustrate results of segmenting 4510 patients data including menial and ratio scales. And then, we show AHP can be identify the attractiveness of each segment, in which the decision maker can select the best target segment.

Keywords

References

  1. 곽경덕. QA활동에서의 마케팅개념의 활용. 한국의료QA학회지 1997; 4(2): 286-293
  2. 권진, 이선희, 손명세. 소비가치에 의한 외래서비스 이용환자의 시방세분화에 관한 연구. 한국병원학회지 1997; 2(1): 96-113
  3. 김지은, 조우현,이선희, 이혜종. 라이프스타일과 의료이용 의사결정과정 분석. 보건행정학회지 1999; 9(2): 40-54
  4. 김소영, 곽영식. 방문시간, 페이지뷰, 방문빈도와의 관계를 mixture model를 적용한 CRM. working paper, 2002
  5. 김유미. 퇴원요약 DB를 이용한 데이터베이스 마케팅. 인제대학교 보건대학원 석사학위 논문 1999
  6. 백수경. 의료서비스의 성과제고를 위한 내부마케팅 전략. 성균관대학교 대학원 경영학과 박사학위 논문. 2000
  7. 서의호, 황현석, 김수연. AHP를 이용한 의사결정 사례연구. 1998년 추계학술연구발표회(한국경영학회) 1998
  8. 유석천, 임호순, 김연성, 생산성 측정을 위한 DEA/AR-AHP 통합모형 개발에 관한 연구. 1998년 추계학술연구발표회(한국경영학회) 1998
  9. 정영한. 병원언론홍보실적에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석. 연세대학교 보건대학원 국제보건학과, 1999
  10. 조우현, 김한중, 이선희. 의료기관의 선택기준에 관한 연구. 예방의학회지, 1992; 25(1): 53-63
  11. 조우현, 이선희, 이해종, 전기홍. 병원서비스마케팅. 퇴설당. 1999
  12. 최길림. 병원이용빈도와 진료수익성에 따른 환자군집별 특성과 데이터베이스 마케팅의 활용성: 부산지역 1개 대학병원 자료를 중심으로. 인제대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문, 2001
  13. 한상만, 곽영식. 2단계 결합분석과 로짓모델을 이용한 시장경쟁구조분석: 한국 청바지 시장의 경우. 경영학연구 1997; 26(3) : 567-596
  14. 한상만, 곽영식. 금융상품선택에 있어서 가격반응함수의 추정에 관한 연구. 마케팅연구 2000; 15(2)
  15. Ben-Akiva M, Lerman SR. Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand. London: The MIT Press, 1993
  16. Bucklin RE, Gupta S. Brand choice, purchase incidence, and segmentation: An integrated modeling approach. Journal of Marketing Research 1993; 29(May): 210-215
  17. Bucklin RE, Gupta S, Han S. A brand's eye view of response segmentation in consumer choice behavior. Journal of Marketing Research 1995; 32(Feb.): 66-74 https://doi.org/10.2307/3152111
  18. Bucklin RE, Gupta S, Siddarth S. Segmenting purchase quantity behavior: A poisson regression mixture model. working paper, Graduate School of Management, University of California, LA. 1991
  19. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 1978; 2: 429-444 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  20. DeSarbo WS, Manrai AK, Manrai LA. Latent class multidimensional scaling: A review of recent developments in the marketing and psychometric literature. in Advanced Methods of Marketing Research. Bagozzi RP(ed.), Cambridge: Blackwell, 1994; 190-222
  21. Dillon WR, Kumar A. Latent structure and other mixture models in marketing: An integrative survey and overview. in Advanced Methods of Marketing Research. Bagozzi RP(ed.), Cambridge: Blackwell, 1994; 295-351
  22. Green PE. A new approach to market segmentation. Business Horizons 1977; 20: 61-73
  23. Kamakura WA, Russell GJ, A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. Journal of Marketing Research 1989; 15(Nov.): 379-390
  24. Lehmann DR, Steckel GS. Marketing research. New York: Addison Wesley Publishing Inc., 1998
  25. Oral M, Ossama K, Lang PA. Methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R&D projects. Management Science 1991; 37(7): 871-885 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.37.7.871
  26. Parkan C, Lam K, Hang G. Operational competitiveness analysis on software development. Journal of the Operational Research Society 1997; 48: 892-905 https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600446
  27. McLachlan G, Basford KE. Mixture model: Inference and applications to clustering. New York: marcel Deckker, 1988
  28. McLachlan G, Peel D. Finite mixture model. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2000
  29. Rosbergen EA, Pieters FGM, Wedel M. Visual attention to advertising: A segment-level analysis. Journal of Consumer Research 1997: 24: 305-314 https://doi.org/10.1086/209512
  30. Satty TL. Multicriteria decision making, the analytic hierarchy process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 1990
  31. Schaffinit C, Rosen D, Paradi JC. Best practice analysis of bank branches: An application of DEA in a large Canadian bank. European Journal of Operational Research 1997; 98: 269-289 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00347-5
  32. Shapiro BP, Bonoma TV. How to segment industrial markets. Harvard Business Review 1984; 62: 104-110
  33. Vriens M, Wedel M, Wiliams T, Metric conjoint segmentation methods: A monte carlo comparison. Journal of Marketing Research 1996; 32: 73-85
  34. Wedel M, Desarbo WS. A mixture likelihood approach for generalized linear models. Journal of Classification 1995; 12: 1-35 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01202263
  35. Wedel M, Kamakura WA. Market segmentation: Conceptual and methodological foundations. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Boston, 2000
  36. Wedel M, Steenkamp JB. Fuzzy clusterwise regression. International Journal of Research in Marketing 1989; 6: 45-49 https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(89)90046-3
  37. Wedel M, Steenkamp JB. A clusterwise regression method for simultaneous fuzzy market structuring and benefit segmentation. Journal of Marketing Research 1991; 28 385-396 https://doi.org/10.2307/3172779