Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

REMOVAL PATTERNS OF SMEAR LAYER ACCORDING TO APPLICATION TEMPERATURE AND TIME OF EDTA

EDTA의 적용 온도와 시간에 따른 도말층의 제거양상

  • Shin, Jang-Shik (Department of Conservative Dentistry College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Cho, Yong-Bum (Department of Conservative Dentistry College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 신장식 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 조용범 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Published : 2002.09.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of EDTA irrigant according to application time and temperature. 31 human mature extracted teeth with a single canal were sectioned with microtome in 3mm thickness and gained 62 samples of root canals. They were distributed randomly into 6 groups of 10 specimens each and control group of 2 specimens. Each specimen was prepared with GT rotary file (Dentsply, Maillefer Co., Swiss) and irrigated with 3 ml sodium hypochlorite every minute. Then smear layer was removed with EDTA solution (PULPDENT$^{\circledR}$, PULPDENT Co., USA.) except two control specimens. Specimens of each group were irrigated with 17% EDTA. The time and temperature of application were as follows : (Table omitted) All specimens were split longitudinally and prepared for examination by scanning electron microscopy. A set of reference micrographs was used to award a debris score as follows: 0 = no smear layer, all tubules clean and open; 1 = no superficial smear layer, tubule openings visible, but some contain debris plug or soft tissue remnants: 2 = moderate smear layer, some tubules open and others closed; 3 = heavy smear layer, most/all tubule openings obscured. Results were evaluated with Kruskal-Wallis test to determine whether there was statistically significant difference among six groups. Pairs of groups were analyzed using the Student-Newman-Keuls Method and Mann-Whitney test. The results were as follows : 1. Control specimens showed heavy smear layer at the canal walls 2. Among the groups applied with EDTA for 2 minutes, group 1 showed the heaviest smear layer, and there was statistically significant difference between group 1 and the other groups(p<0.05). 3. Among the groups applied with EDTA for 5 minutes, group 4 and group 6 showed smear layer but there was no significant difference between them. 4. Among the groups applied with EDTA for the same temperature, group 1 showed heavier smear layer than group 4, and there was statistically significant difference(p<0.05). 5. Among the groups applied with EDTA for the same temperature, group 2 showed heavier smear layer than group 5 and group 3 showed heavier smear layer than group 6. But there was no statistically significant difference among them. From the results above, it could be concluded, EDTA solution is effective in removing of smear layer when it is applied for 5 minutes. If EDTA is applied for 2 minutes, it should be applied above room temperature.

Keywords

References

  1. McComb D, Smith DC. A preliminary scanning electron microscopic study of root canals after endodontic procedures. J Endodon 1975;1:238-42 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80226-3
  2. Vojinovic O, Nyborgh H, Brannstom M. Acid treatment of cavities under resin fillings: Bacterial growth in dentinal tubules and pulpal reactions. J Dent Res 1973:52:1189-93 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345730520060501
  3. Diamond A, Carrel R. The smear layer: a review of restorative process. J Pedodon 1984;8:219-26
  4. Baker NA, Eleazer PD, Averbach RE, Seltzer S. Scanning electron microscopic study of the efficacy of various irrigaing solutions. J Endodon 1975;1:127-35 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80097-5
  5. Yamada RS, Armas A, Goldman M, Lin PS. A Scanning electron microscopic comparison of a high volume final flush with several irrigating solutions: Part III, J Endodon 1983;9:137-42 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(83)80032-6
  6. Pashley DH, Livingstone MJ. Effect of molecular size on permeability coefficients in human dentine. Arch Oral Biol 1978:23:391-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(78)90098-5
  7. Uitto VJ, Haapasalo M, Laakso T, Salo T. Degradation of basement membrane(Type IV) collagen by proteases from some anaerobic microorganisms. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1973;3:97-102 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302X.1988.tb00092.x
  8. Pitt Ford TR. Roberts GJ. Tissue response to glass ionomer retrograde root fillings. Inter Endod J 1990:23:233-8 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1990.tb00854.x
  9. Ingle JI. Endodontics, 3rd edn. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Lea and Febiger, 178-80
  10. Rubin L, Skobe F, Krakow A, Gron P. The effect of instrumentation and flushing of freshly extracted teeth in endodontic therapy: a scanning electron microscope study. J Endodon 1979;5:328-35 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(79)80088-6
  11. Moorer WR, Wesselink PR. Factors promoting the tissue dissolving capability of sodium hypochlorite. Inter Endod J 1982;15:187-96 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1982.tb01277.x
  12. Seidberg BH, Schilder H. An evaluation of EDTA in endodontics. Oral Surg 1974;37:609-20 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(74)90294-1
  13. Patterson S. In vivo and in vitro studies of the effect of the disodium salt of EDTA on human dentin and its endodontic implications. Oral Surg 1963;16:83-103 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(63)90367-0
  14. Nikiforuk G. Sreebny L. Demineralization of hard tissues by organic chelating agents. Science 1951:114:560 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.114.2969.560
  15. Gianluca Gambarini. Shaping and cleaning the root canal system: a scanning electron microscopic evaluation of a new instrumentation and irrigation technique. J Endodon 1999;25:800-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80300-8
  16. Brannstrom M, Nordenvall KJ, Grantz PO. The effect of EDTA-containing surface-active solutions on the morphology of prepared dentin: an in vivo study. J Dent Res 1980:59:1127-31 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345800590070501
  17. Cameron JA. The use of ultrasound for the removal of the smear layer. The effect of sodium hypochlorite concentrations: SEM study. Australian Dent J 1988:33:193-200 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1988.tb01313.x
  18. Eick JD. Wilko RA. Anderson CH, Sorensen SE. Scanning electron microscopy of cut tooth surfaces.and identification of debris by use of the electron microprobe. J Dent Res 1970;49:1359-68 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345700490063601
  19. Pashley DH, Tao L, Boyd L, King GE, Horner JA. Scanning electron microscopy of the substructure of smear layers in human dentin. Arch Oral Biol 1988;33:265-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(88)90188-4
  20. Mader CL, Baumgartner JC. Peters DD. Scanning electron microscopy investigation of the smeared layer on root canal walls. J Endodon 1984:10:477-83 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(84)80204-6
  21. Cengiz T, Aktener BO, Piskin B. The effect of dentinal tubule orientation on the removal of smear layer by root canal irrigants. A scanning electron microscopic study. Inter Endod J 1990:33:193-200
  22. Perez F, Calas P, De Falguerolles A, Maurette A. Migration of a streptococcus sanguis strain through root dental tubules. J Endodon 1993:19:297-301 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80460-7
  23. Kennedy W, Walker WA, Gough RW. Smear layer removal effects on apical leakage. J Endodon 1986;12:21-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(86)80277-1
  24. Wayman BE, Kopp WM, Pinero GJ, Lazzari EP. Citric and lactic acids as root canal irrigants in vitro. J of Endodon 1979;5:258-65 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(79)80171-5
  25. Bitter NC. A 25% tannic acid solution as a root canal irrigant cleanser: a scanning electron microscope study. Oral Surg 1989;67:333-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(89)90366-6
  26. McComb D. Smith DC, Beagrie GS. The results of in vitro endodontic chemomechanical instrumentation-a scanning electron microscope study. J British Endodontic Society 1976;9:11-8 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1976.tb01231.x
  27. Takeda FH, Harashima T. Kimura Y. Matsumoto K. A comparative study of the removal of smear layer by three endodontic irrigants and two types of laser. Int Endod J 1999:32;32-39 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00182.x
  28. Fehr FR, Nygaard-Ostby. Effect of EDTA and sulphuric acid on root canal dentine. Oral Surg 1963;16:199-205 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(63)90033-1
  29. Fraser JG. Chelating agents: Their softening effect on root canal dentin. Oral Surg 1974;37:803-11 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(74)90145-5
  30. Biesterfeld RC, Taintor JF. A comparison of periapical seal of root canals with RC-Prep or Salvizol. Oral Surg 1980;49:532-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(80)90079-1

Cited by

  1. Comparison of Antibacterial effect of Listerine® with Various root canal irrigants vol.34, pp.6, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.6.500
  2. The comparison of different canal irrigation methods to prevent reaction precipitate between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine vol.35, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.2.080
  3. Apical foramen morphology according to the length of merged canal at the apex vol.38, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.26