Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A STUDY OF HISTOMORPHOLOGICAL CHANGE OF CURVED ROOT CANAL PREPARATION USING GT ROTARY FILE, PROFILE AND STAINLESS STEEL K-FILE

수종의 Engine driven NiTi file과 stainless steel K-file을 이용한 근관형성 후 근관의 조직형태학적 변화에 관한 연구

  • Ko, Hyung-Jung (Department of Conservative Dentistry College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Baek, Seung-Ho (Department of Conservative Dentistry College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 고현정 (서울대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 백승호 (서울대학교 치과대학 보존학교실)
  • Published : 2002.11.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the histomorphological change of curved root canal preparation using GT rotary File, Profile .04 taper and stainless steel K-file. 45 mesial canals(over 20 degree) of extracted human mandibular first molars were mounted in resin using a modified Bramante muffle system and divided into three groups. The roots were cross-sectioned at 2.5mm 5mm and 8mm levels from apical foramen. Tracings of the canals were made from preinstrumentation pictures of the cross section. The canals were prepared using a step-back technique with stainless steel K file(group 1), Profile .04 taper rotary file(group 2) and GT rotary file(group 3). Tracings of the prepared canals were made from postinstrumentation picture. Canal centring ratio. amount of transportation, area of dentin removed and shape of canal were measured and statistically were evaluated with Student-Newman-Keuls test using Sigma Stat(Jandel Scientific Software, USA). The results were as followings : 1 Amount of transportation of group 2 was the lowest at apical part, but there was no statistical difference. The direction of transportation was the outside of curvature at apical part. 2. Centering ratio at the apical part of group 1 was the highest, and there was statistical differences between apical and middle part, apical and coronal part(p＜0.05). Centering ratio at the middle part of group 3 was the lowest, and there was statistical difference between apical and middle part(p＜0.05). Centering ratio of group 2 was the lowest at apical part, but there was no statistical difference. 3. Amount of dentin removed of group 1 was the highest at coronal, middle and apical part among three groups, and there was statistical difference(p＜0.05). 4. The majority of the cross-sectioned canal shape after instrumentation were irregular at coronal, middle and apical part. But there are more number of round shaped canals at group 3 than other group.

Keywords

References

  1. Weine F, Kelly R, Lio P. The effect of preparation procedures on the original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. J Endodon 1975;1:255-62 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80037-9
  2. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 1974;18:269-96
  3. Weine F. Endodontic therapy St. Louis: CV Mosby. 1989:277
  4. Walton R. Current concepts of canal preparation. Dent Clin North Am 1992;32:309-326
  5. Morgan LA, Montgomery S. An evaluation of the crown-down pressureless technique. J Endodon 1984;10:491-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(84)80207-1
  6. Goerig A, Michelich R, Schultz H. Instrumentation of root canals in molars using the step-down technique. J Endodon 1982;8:550-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(82)80015-0
  7. Roane J. Sabala C. Duncanson M. The 'balanced force' concept for instrumentation of curved canals. J Endodon 1985;11 203-11 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(85)80061-3
  8. Chenail BL. Teplitsky PE. Endosonics in curved root canals. J Endodon 1985; 11:369-74 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(85)80022-4
  9. Walsh C, EIDeeb ME. Messee HH. Effect of varying ultrasonic power on instrumentation time and prepared canal space. J Endodon 1987;13:133-8
  10. Walia H, Brantley WA, Gerstein H, An investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endodon 1988;14:346-51
  11. Esposito PT, Cunningham CJ. A comparison of canal preparation with Nickel-Titanium and Stainless steel instruments. J Endodon 1995;21:173-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80560-1
  12. 백승호, 만곡근관에서 Engine-driven NiTi file, 초음파기구, stainless steel file을 이용한 근관형성 후 근관형태 변화에 관한 연구, 대한치과협회지 1995;34:5:363-371
  13. 박한수 등, ProFile을 이용한 만곡근관 형성시 근관형태에 관한 연구, 대한치과보존학회지, 24:633-637
  14. Hata G, Uemura M, Toda T. Kato AS, Irnura, A comparison of shaping ability using ProFile, GT file, and Flex-R endodontic instruments in simulated canals. J Endodon. 25:4:299, 1999
  15. Bramante CM, Berbert A, Borges RP: A Methdology for evaluation of root canal instrumentation. J Endodon 13;243-45. 1987 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(87)80099-7
  16. Calhoun G, Mongomery S. The effects of four instrumentation technique on root canal shape. J Endodon. 14: 273-277, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80025-6
  17. Lee SJ, Shin YG, Hwang HK. Transportation of curved canal after canal enlargement according to filing instruments. J KACD 24:503-510, 1999
  18. Haga CS, Microscope measurements of root canal preparations folowing instrumentation, J Br Endo Soc 2:41-46, 1968 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1968.tb01209.x
  19. Walton RE. Histologic evaluation of different methods of enlarging the pulp canal space, J Endodon 10:304-310, 1976
  20. Mizrahi SJ, Yucker JW, Seltzer S: A scanning electron microscopic study of the efficacy of various endodontic instruments. J Endodon 1:324-33, 1975 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80012-4
  21. Bolanos OR, Jensen JR. Scanning electron microscope comparison of the efficacy of various methods of root cnal preparation. J Endodon 6:815-821, 1980 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(80)80034-3
  22. Tachibana H, Matsumoto K : Applicability of x-ray computerized tomography in endodontics. Endod Dent Traumatol 6:16-20, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1990.tb00381.x
  23. Gambill JM, Alder M, Rio CE Comparioson of NickelTitanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography J Endodon 22:369-375, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(96)80221-4
  24. Buchanan LS. The shape of things to come. Dentistry today., 13 1994
  25. Tucker DM. Wenckus CS, Bentkover SK: Canal wall planning by engine-driven Nickel-Titanium instruments, compared with stainless steel hand instrumentation. J Endodon 23:170-173, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80269-5
  26. Luiten DJ, Morgan LA, Baumgartner JC. A comparison of four instrumentation techniques on apical canal transportation. J Endodon 21:26-32, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80553-4
  27. 이지현, 조용범 수종의 근관형성 방법이 근관형태에 미치는 영향, 대한치과보존협회지 24:337-345, 1999
  28. Kosa DA, Marshall G, Baumgartner JC An analysis of canal centring using mechanical instrumentation techniques, J Endodon 25:441-445, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80275-1
  29. Lim KA, Yoon SH A comparision of stainless steel K-file, Profile.04, and Quantec LX instruments to shape curved root canals in vitro, 대한치과보존학회지 25:133-140, 2000
  30. Glosson CR, Haller RH. Dove SB, Rio CE. A comparison of root canal preparations using NiTi hand, NiTi engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments. J Endodon 1005;21:146-51 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80441-3
  31. Baumgartner JC, Martin H, Sabala CL, Strittmatter EJ, Wildey WL, Quigley NC. Histomorphic comparison of canals prepared by four techniques. J Endodon 1992; 17:530-4
  32. Bou Dagher FE, Yared GM. Comparison of three files to prepare curved root canals. J Endodon 1995;21:264-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80994-5

Cited by

  1. A comparative study on the canal configuration after shaping by ProFile, ProTaper™ and K-Flexofile in simulated canals with different angles of curvature vol.30, pp.4, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.4.294
  2. Comparison of shaping ability of rotary Ni-Ti file systems used by undergraduates vol.31, pp.1, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.1.001
  3. in simulated canals with different curvatures vol.32, pp.2, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.2.087
  4. Evaluation of apical canal shapes produced sequentially during instrumentation with stainless steel hand and Ni-Ti rotary instruments using Micro-computed tomography vol.36, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.3.231