Trend and Further Research of Rice Quality Evaluation

쌀의 품질평가 현황과 금후 연구방향

  • 손종록 (농촌진흥청 작물시험장) ;
  • 김재현 (농촌진흥청 작물시험장) ;
  • 이정일 (농촌진흥청 작물시험장) ;
  • 윤영환 (농촌진흥청 작물시험장) ;
  • 김제규 (농촌진흥청 작물시험장) ;
  • 황흥구 (농촌진흥청 작물시험장) ;
  • 문헌팔 (농촌진흥청 작물시험장)
  • Published : 2002.12.01

Abstract

Rice quality is much dependent on the pre-and post harvest management. There are many parameters which influence rice or cooked rice qualitys such as cultivars, climate, soil, harvest time, drying, milling, storage, safety, nutritive value, taste, marketing, eating, cooking conditions, and each nations' food culture. Thus, vice evaluation might not be carried out by only some parameters. Physicochemical evaluation of rice deals with amy-lose content, gelatinizing property, and its relation with taste. The amylose content of good vice in Korea is defined at 17 to 20%. Other parameters considered are as follows; ratio of protein body-1 per total protein amount in relation to taste, and oleic/linoleic acid ratio in relation to storage safety. The rice higher Mg/K ratio is considered as high quality. The optimum value is over 1.5 to 1.6. It was reported that the contents of oligosaccharide, glutamic acid or its derivatives and its proportionalities have high corelation with the taste of rice. Major aromatic compounds in rice have been known as hexanal, acetone, pentanal, butanal, octanal, and heptanal. Recently, it was found that muco-polysaccharides are solubilized during cooking. Cooked rice surface is coated by the muco-polysaccharide. The muco-polysaccharide aye contributing to the consistency and collecting free amino acids and vitamins. Thus, these parameters might be regarded as important items for quality and taste evaluation of rice. Ingredients of rice related with the taste are not confined to the total rice grain. In the internal kernel, starch is main component but nitrogen and mineral compounds are localized at the external kernel. The ingredients related with taste are contained in 91 to 86% part of the outside kernel. For safety that is considered an important evaluation item of rice quality, each residual tolerance limit for agricultural chemicals must be adopted in our country. During drying, rice quality can decline by the reasons of high drying temperature, overdrying, and rapid drying. These result in cracked grain or decolored kernel. Intrinsic enzymes react partially during the rice storage. Because of these enzymes, starch, lipid, or protein can be slowly degraded, resulting in the decline of appearance quality, occurrence of aging aroma, and increased hardness of cooked rice. Milling conditions concerned with quality are paddy quality, milling method, and milling machines. To produce high quality rice, head rice must contain over three fourths of the normal rice kernels, and broken, damaged, colored, and immature kernels must be eliminated. In addition to milling equipment, color sorter and length grader must be installed for the production of such rice. Head rice was examined using the 45 brand rices circulating in Korea, Japan, America, Australia, and China. It was found that the head rice rate of brand rice in our country was approximately 57.4% and 80-86% in foreign countries. In order to develop a rice quality evaluation system, evaluation of technics must be further developed : more detailed measure of qualities, search for taste-related components, creation and grade classification of quality evaluation factors at each management stage of treatment after harvest, evaluation of rice as food material as well as for rice cooking, and method development for simple evaluation and establishment of equation for palatability. On policy concerns, the following must be conducted : development of price discrimination in conformity to rice cultivar and grade under the basis of quality evaluation method, fixation of head rice branding, and introduction of low temperature circulation.

Keywords

References

  1. 食糧廳. 1986. 農産物 儉査に 關する 質科
  2. 농산물검사기준표. 2001. 농산물품질관리원. 227-268
  3. 安達一郞. 1984. メシの 'うまさ'食味を コメ·メシの 各種の理化學的特性より 理論 式で 導き出す試み 日昨中國支部硏究集錄26: 23-24
  4. 安達一郞. 1985. 炊飯の 食味を 理論式によって 評定する 試み(1),日昨紀. 別2, 114-115
  5. 배종하. 2002. 쌀 산업추진 대책방향. 쌀산업 발전 방향과 경기미특성화 방안 세 미나. (사)한농연. 29-41
  6. Barber, Sand C, Benedito De Barber. 1979
  7. Buttery. R. G. 1983 Agric. Food. Chem 31 : 823 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00118a036
  8. 竹生新治郎. 1975. 米. 地球社. 156-167
  9. 竹生新治郎. 1983. 米の食味と 理化學的性質の 關連 殿粉科學30(4): 333-341
  10. 竹生新治郎. 1985. 多種回歸分析による 米の食味の判定式の設定 殿粉科學 32(1): 51-60
  11. 竹生新治郞. 1988.米の 食味と 理化學的 性質の 關連 殿粉科學30(4):333-341
  12. 竹生新沿郞. 1995. 米の科學. 朝倉書店. 135-13
  13. 玉置雜産. 1986. 白米ならびに 米飯付差の 遊離 アミノ酸 日作紀55(2): 137-l38
  14. 江幡守衝. 1988. 米の 品質形成に 關する 硏究. 1987年度 文部省科學硏究費 補助金 (一般硏究A) 硏究成果報告
  15. 식품의약청. 2000. 고시 제2000-18호
  16. 식품의약청. 2002. 고시 제2002-1호
  17. Gomez. K. A. 1979. Efffct of environment on protein and amylosecontent of rice. chemical aspect of rice grain quality. IRRI. 59-68
  18. Taira. H. and Taira. H. 1964. Studies on amino acid content in foodcrops. Effct of the diffrence of transplating and ripening stage ontotal and free amino acids in rice. J. Japan. Sci. Food Nutr. 16(5):89-91
  19. Taira. H., Taira H., Hoshino. N. and sugimura. K. 1963. Amino acidcomposition of rice protein. amino acids of protein of riceimported into Japan. J. Japan. Sci. Food Nutr. 16(1):46-47
  20. Taira. H., Taira H., Hoshino. N. and sugimure. K. 1964. Studies onarmino acid contents in food crops. Effcts of fertilization on theamino acids in rice. J. Japan. Sci. Food Nutr. 16(5):86-88
  21. 堀內久弥. 1969. 食糧-その 枓學と 技術. 榮養と 食糧 12:1-19
  22. 堀野俊郎. 1988. 米の三ネラル成分と 食味 稻と米. 67-86
  23. 堀野俊郎. 1998. おいしい お米の 栽培指針. 農山漁村文化 協會.21
  24. 堀野俊郎. 孫種錄. 1992. 米粒各層から 得た 米粉の 水抽出液中の糖類 日作紀 61(別 1): 178-179
  25. 堀野俊郎. 2002. 未 發表 Data
  26. Horino. T. and Okamoto. M. 1992. Relationship between nitrogen andmineral contents in rice grain and it's palatability after cooking.The Bulletin of the Chugoku National Agricultural Experinent Sta-tion 10 :1-15
  27. IRRI report. Outlook for rice milling quality evaluation systems chemical aspects of rice grain quality, IRRI. 209-222
  28. 石間紀男, 平宏和, 平春技. 1974. 精白米の タンパク質含量と 食味評価. 食總硏報. 29. 9
  29. 益重博, 田中國介. 1994. プロテインポデイI. IIの 分布含量と 米の食味. 育種學雜誌. 44(2):238
  30. Juliano, B. O. 1985. Criteria and tests for rice grain qualities. Rice : Chemistry and technology. American Association of cerealChemists. 443-524
  31. Juliano, B. O., L. U. Onate, and A. M. Del Mundo, 1965. Food Tech-nol. 19:1006
  32. 김광호, 채제천. 임무상, 조수연, 박내경. 1988. 쌀품질의 연구현황, 문제점 및 방향. 한작지(품질연구1호):1-17
  33. 김동훈. 1998. 식품화학. 탐구당 668-670
  34. Kim. C. Y., Lee. J. C., Kim. Y. H. and Lee. S. G., 1999. Vo1ati1e flavorcomponents of scent, colored and common rice cultivars in korea.Korean J. Crop. SC 44(3):181-181
  35. 黑田 晃. 1995. 北陸地域における 米の理化學特性に 基づく食味推定式 北陸農業の 新技術 8: 130-135
  36. Lee. B. Y. 1987. Studies on properties of high yield line korean ricePh. D Thesis : 100-11
  37. 이병영, 손종록. 1991 쌀의 취반후 휘발성 성분 발생량 변화. 한국식품과학회지 23(5):610-613
  38. 이병영, 손종록, 김영배, 윤인화. 1991. 미곡의 건조 적정온도에 관한 연구. 한국농화학회지. 341 : 258-261
  39. 이병영, 손종록, 김영배. 1991. 배아미 오봉벼의 영양가. 한작지.36(4) : 366-369
  40. 丸山悅子. 1983. 米飯の 特理化學的 特性と 食味評価の 關係 家政學雜誌 34(12):819-825
  41. 松屈孝領. 1990. 稻學大成筆卷. 農支協 293
  42. 문헌팔. 2002. 소비자가 원하는 고품질 농산물 생산방안(토른회자료)농촌진흥청7-9
  43. 문형인, 이재학, 이동린. 1996. 전자코시스템에 의한 향미의 방향성 성분분석. 한작지 41(6):672-677
  44. 大坪硏一. 1993. 米食味評価の ための理化學的測定とその 解析 北陸農業の新技術 6: 19-23
  45. 大坪硏-. 1995. 米食の理化學的測定による 食味平価. 農林水産技術硏究ジャ-ナル 18(1):10-16
  46. 大坪硏一. 1996 米の 美味しさを 測る. 米の美味しさの 科學. 32-34
  47. 大坪硏一. 1999. 米の 品質平儒価に ついて. 食品工學. 42(17):55-61
  48. Okamoto, M., Horono, T. and sakai, Ma. 1992. Relation of nitrogencontent and Mg/K ratio of brown rice to stickiness of cooked rice.Japan. J. Breed. 42 : 595-603 https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs1951.42.595
  49. 奥村彪生. 1995 お米を かンく 食べる お米 ギャラリ 6-7
  50. 奥野元子. 1989 炊飯の 食味を 理論式で 平定する 試み(5)新 · 吉ク米混合の食味 評価とパネルの安定度 日昨中國支部硏究集錄30:13-14
  51. 奥野元子. 1985 炊飯の 食味を 理論式で評定する 試み(2) 58年島根縣産米の 官 能檢査 日昨中國支部硏究集錄 27:38-39
  52. 農林水産技術會議事務局. 1991. 品質評価基準に 關する硏究會報告書 : 98-113
  53. 농촌진흥청 2001, 고품질 쌀생산기술 14
  54. 接田 博. 1988. 米の食味と理化學的特性に 關する 育種的 硏究 第1報 食味特性の 評価と 品種間差異 日昨東北支部報 31:1-4
  55. 熱行盛主. 1991, 九川産米食味の 飛躍的向上に むはて. 107
  56. 통계청 통계연보 2001
  57. 손종록. 1992. 미립 각층별 분말의 이화힉적 성질. 박사학위논문: 34-42
  58. 손종록. 2001. 미발표 Data
  59. 손종록, 오만진, 이병영, 윤인화. 1994. 미립의 층별 이화학적 성질.농진청 논업논문집 36(2): 78-84
  60. 田島眞, 堀野俊郎. 前田万里, 孫鐘線. 1992. 米粒外層から 抽出される オリゴ糖類, 食工. 39(10): 857-861
  61. 田中國介. 1995. 米蛋白質の 化學 ―プロテインポデイの構造と 分布. 農林水産硏究. ギャ-ナル 18(1):33-40
  62. 高野哲夫. 松畸照夫. 1991. 栽培イネの 登熱特性. 殺粒品質の 遺傳的制御. 栽培 條件による イネ種子中遊離アミノ酸の變異. 支部省料學硏究費補助金(一般硏究A)硏究成果報告書. 68-76
  63. 谷達雄. 1969. 米の 食味評価に 關する 理化學的 要因 榮養と食糧.22(7):452-461
  64. 高野克己. 1989. 日食工誌. 36:519-524
  65. 柳瀨肇.大平硏一. 1886. 精米水分と 米飯テクスチヤ-の 關係 食總硏報. 49:1-5
  66. 柳瀨肇. 大平硏一. 橋本勝産. 1984. 食總硏究. 45: 1-8
  67. Yasumatsu. K, Moritaka, S and Wada. S 1996. Agric. Biol.Chem. 30 : 483-486
  68. 吉川年産. 1992. 近赤外分光法による 農産物の 非破壞品質価 第4報 米の 食味 評価 近 畿中固農業硏究 83:86-89