EFFECT ON THE COLOR STABILITY OF STAINED PORCELAIN DUE TO TOOTH BRUSHING

잇솔질이 도재의 색 안정성에 미치는 영향

  • Lee, Im-Gi (Department of Prosthodontics and Institute of Oral Bio Science, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Jeong, Jun-Oh (Department of Prosthodontics and Institute of Oral Bio Science, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Park, Charn-Woon (Department of Prosthodontics and Institute of Oral Bio Science, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
  • 이임기 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 정준오 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 박찬운 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소)
  • Published : 2002.04.01

Abstract

This study is going to compare the degree of color change which occurs in the following two cases of the factors which cause the color change of extra-staining, one is during glazing by the dental technician, the other is tooth brush abrasion which makes the biggest influence on color change. To compare the degree of color change before and after glazing, a sample was made with vintage incisal porcelain No. 59 OPAL(Shofu Inc, Japan), after that it was painted with three colors of porcelain stainers, then the degree of color was measured with a spectrophometer(Model Chromaview 300, Spectoron Tech Co. Korea) after it had been treated with firing only and glazing after firing 40,000-cycle and 80,000-cycle of tooth brush abrasion test were carried out in order to simulate the brushing effect of 4 years and 8 years by using the abrasion tester. The colors were measured before the test, and after the 40,000-cycle and 80.000-cycle operations and the surfaces were examined by SEM. The results of this study were as follows ; 1. The color change before and after glazing was not great enough to have a clinical significance but the orange color was changed more significantly statistically than the blue and light brown(p<0.05). 2. In the case of the color change of stained porcelain by tooth brushing, carrying out staining and glazing with two-times firings resulted in statically less color change than one firing only(p<0.05). 3. In the case of the difference in the stainer's color, the orange color which has higher chroma was statically more sensitive than the blue color(p<0.05) 4. In the case of the color change after the 80,000-cycle abrasion, all showed color change when there was one firing and the orange stainer showed some color change with clinical significance when firings were done two times.

Keywords

References

  1. Aker DA, Aker JR, Sorensen SE. Tooth brush abrasion of color-corrective porcelain stains applied to porcelain-fused-to-metal restoration. J Prosthetic Dent. 1980: 44:161-3
  2. Jacobs SH, Goodacre CJ. Effect of porcelain thickness and type of metal-ceramic alloy on color. J Prosthetic Dent. 1987: 57: 138-45
  3. Firdaus B, Saul W. The microscopic appearance and effect of tooth brushing on extrinsically stained metal-ceramic restoration. J Prosthetic Dent. 1987:57:47-52
  4. Kathy LO, John MP. Effect of dissolution on color of extrinsic porcelain colorants. Int J Prosthodont. 1993:6:558-63
  5. Sproull RC. Color matching in dentistry. Part II: practical application of the organization of color. J Prosthetic Dent. 1973: 29: 556-66
  6. Nasser B. Color and glaze Effect of repeated firing. J Prosthetic Dent. 1982:47: 393-95
  7. Bruce JC. Relative color stability of ceramic stains subjected to glazing temperatures. J Prosthetic Dent. 1991 :66:20-23
  8. Peter SL, Ted JP. Color changes of porcelain surface colorants resulting from firing. Int J Prosthodont. 1992: 5: 22-27
  9. Stanford WB, Fan PL, Wozniak WT. Effects of finishing on color and gloss of composite with different fillers(Abstr No 451). J Dent Res 1983:62:219-24
  10. Naomi T, Hideo M. Wear and surface roughness of current prosthetic composites after toothbrush/dentifrice abrasion. J Prosthetic Dent. 2000:84:93-97
  11. Svinneseth PN, Gjerdet NR. Abrasibility of toothpaste. An invitro study of toothpaste marketed in Norway. Acta Odontol Scand 1987 :45: 195-202
  12. Copps DP, Lacy AM, Curtis T, Carman JE. Effects of topical fluorides on five low-fusing dental porcelain. J Prosthetic Dent. 1984:52:340-3
  13. Craig RG. Restorative Dental Materials. St louis: Mosby, 1989:42
  14. Roulet JF. Degradation of dental polymers 1st ed New York: Karger. 1987:60-160
  15. Harrison A, Wear of combination of acrylic resin and porcelain on an abrasion testing machines. J Oral Rehabil. 1987:4:111-115
  16. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Chewing pressure Vs. Wear of composites and opposing enamel cusps. J Dent Res. 1992;71:1521-1529
  17. Rosenstiel SF. Colour measurements of all ceramic crown systems J Oral Rehabilitation 1989;16:491-501
  18. Seghi RR., Johnston WM. Spectrophoto-metric analysis of color difference between porcelain systems. J Prosthetic Dent. 1986;56:35-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90279-9
  19. Michael W, Richard J. Goodkind. Spectrophotometric of five porcelain shades relative to the dimension of color, procelain thickness, and repeated firings. J Prosthetic Dent. ;42:96-105
  20. Crispin BJ. Hewlett E. Seighi R. Relative color stability of ceramic stains subjected to glazing temperatures. J Prosthetic Dent, 1991: 66: 20-3
  21. O' Brien WJ, Groh CL, Boenke KM. A new, small color difference equation for dental shade. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 1762-4 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690111001
  22. Wozniak WT. Proposed guidelines for the acceptance program for dental shade guides, American dental association, Chicago, p.1-2, 1987
  23. Seghi R, Johnston W, O' Brien WJ. Performance assessment of colorimetric devices on dental porcelains, J Dent Res 1989: 68: 1755-9
  24. Seighi R. Hewlett E, Kim J. Visual and Instrumental colorimetric assessments of small color difference on translucent dental porcelain. J Dent Res 1989: 68: 1760-4