Journal of The Korean Astronomical Society (천문학회지)

The Korean Astronomical Society (한국천문학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

SEASONAL AND UNIVERSAL TIME VARIATIONS OF THE AU, AL AND DST INDICES

  • AHN BYUNG-HO (Department of Earth Science Kyungpook National University) ;
  • MOON GA-HEE (Department of Astronomy and Atmospheric Sciences Kyungpook National University)
  • Published : 2003.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Various attempts have been made to explain the: pronounced seasonal and universal time (UT) variations of geomagnetic indices. As one of such attempts, we analyze the hourly-averaged auroral electroject indices obtained during the past 20 years. The AU and AL indices maximize during summer and equinoctial months, respectively. By normalizing the contribution of the solar conductivity enhancement to the AU index, or to the eastward electrojet, it is found that the AU also follows the same semiannual variation pattern of the AL index, suggesting that the electric field is the main modulator of the semiannual magnetic variation. The fact that the variation pattern of the yearly-mean AU index follows the mirror image of the AL index provides another indication that the electric field is the main modulator of magnetic disturbance. The pronounced UT variations of the auroral electrojet indices are also noted. To determine the magnetic activity dependence, the probability of recording a given activity level of AU and AL during each UT is examined. The UT variation of the AL index, thus obtained, shows a maximum at around 1200-1800 UT and a minimum around 0000-0800 UT particularly during winter. It is closely associated with the rotation of the geomagnetic pole around the rotational axis, which results in the change of the solar-originated ionospheric conductivity distribution over the polar region. On the other hand the UT variation is prominent during disturbed periods, indicating that the latitudinal mismatch between the AE stations and the auroral electrojet belt is responsible for it. Although not as prominent as the AL index, the probability distribution of the AU also shows two UT peaks. We confirm that the Dst index shows more prominent seasonal variation than the AE indices. However, the UT variation of the Dst index is only noticeable during the main phase of a magnetic storm. It is a combined result of the uneven distribution of the Dst stations and frequent developments of the partial ring current and substorm wedge current preferentially during the main phase.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, B.-H., Emery, B. A., Kroehl, H. W., & Kamide, Y. 1999, Climatological characteristics of the auroral ionosphere in terms of electric field and ionospheric conductance, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 10031 https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JA900043
  2. Ahn, B.-H., Kroehl, H. W., Kamide, Y., & Kihn, E. A. 2000a, Universal time variations of the auroral electrojet indices, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 267 https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JA900364
  3. Ahn, B.-H., Kroehl, H. W., Kamide, Y., & Kihn, E. A. 2000b, Seasonal and solar cycle variations of the auroral electrojet indices, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 62, 1301 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(00)00073-0
  4. Ahn, B.-H, Moon, Ga-Hee, Sun, W., Akasofu, S.-I., Chen, G. X., & Park, Y. D. 2002, Universal time variation of the Dst and the relationship between the cumulative AL and Dst indices during geomagnetic storms, J. Geophys. Res, 107(Al1), 1409 https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009257
  5. Allen, J. H., & Kroehl, H. W. 1975, Spatial and temporal distributions of magnetic effects of auroral electrojets as derived from AE indice, J. Geophys. Res., 80, 3607
  6. Bartels, J. 1925, Eine universelle Tagsperiode der erdmagnetischen Aktivitat, J.,Meteorol. Z., 42, 147
  7. Bohlin, J. D. 1977, Extreme-ultraviolet observations of coronal holes, Sol. Phys., 51, 377 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00216373
  8. Chapman, S., & Bartels, J. 1940, Geomagnetism, Vol. 1, Oxford Univ. Press
  9. Cliver, E. W., Kamide, Y., & Ling, A. G. 2000, Mountains versus valleys: Semiannual variation of geomagnetic activity, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 2413 https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JA900439
  10. Cliver, E. W., Svalgaard, L., & Ling, A. G. 2002, Evidence for a dominant Russell-McPherron/ Rosenberg-Coleman origin of the semiannual variations of geomagnetic activity in 1954 and 1996, EOS, Trans., AGU, 83(47), F1204
  11. Cortie, A. L. 1912, Sunspots and terrestrial magnetic phenomena, 1898-1911: The cause of the annual variation in magnetic disturbances, MNRAS, 73, 52 https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/73.1.52
  12. Gizler, V. A., Kuznetsov, B. M., Sergeev, V. A., & Troshichev, O. A. 1976, The sources of the polar cap and low latitude bay-like disturbances during substorms, Planet. Space Sci., 24, 1133 https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(76)90150-1
  13. Hajkowicz, L. A. 1998, Longitudinal(UT) effect in the onset of auroral disturbances over two solar cycles as deduced from the AE-index, Ann. Geophys., 16, 1573 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-998-1573-9
  14. Kamide, Y., & Kokubun, S. 1996, Two-component auroral electrojet: importance for substorm studies, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 13027 https://doi.org/10.1029/96JA00142
  15. McIntosh, D. H. 1959, On the annual variation of magnetic disturbance, Phil. Trans. R. S. London, 251, 525 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1959.0010
  16. Richmond, A. D. 1995, Handbook of Atmospheric Electrodynamics, Vol. 2, CRE
  17. Robinson, R. M., & Vondrak, R. R. 1984, Measuremerits of E region ionization and conductivity produced by solar illumination at high latitude, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 3951 https://doi.org/10.1029/JA089iA06p03951
  18. Russell, C. T., & McPherron, R. L. 1973, Semiannual variation of geomagnetic activity, J. Geophys. Res., 78, 92 https://doi.org/10.1029/JA078i001p00092
  19. Svalgaard, L. 2002, The semi-annual variation of geomagnetic activity, EOS, Trans., AGU, 83(47), F1236
  20. Svalgaard, L. 1977, Geomagnetic activity: dependence on solar wind parameters, in Coronal Holes and High Speed Wind Streams, ed. By Zirker, J. B., Colorado Assoc. Univ. Press, Boulder, CO, p. 371
  21. Takalo, J., &. Mursula, M. 2001, A model for the diurnal universal time variation of the Dst index, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 10905 https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JA000231

Cited by

  1. Comparing the diurnal variations in the SuperMAG auroral electrojet indices SML and SMU vol.59, pp.29-30, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-014-0451-y
  2. Statistical analysis of solar wind parameters and geomagnetic indices during HILDCAA/HILDCAA ∗ occurrences between 1998 and 2007 vol.60, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.06.023
  3. Latitudinal and MLT dependence of the seasonal variation of geomagnetic field around auroral zone vol.60, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.04.022
  4. Solar magnetic polarity dependency of geomagnetic storm seasonal occurrence vol.116, pp.A6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA016362
  5. Regular Variations of Intensity of the Westward Auroral Electrojet according to the Geomagnetic AL Index vol.58, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793218030106