A Comparative Study of the Degree Satisfaction of Body Image and Sex-role Identity Between Primary School Boys and Girls

남.녀 초등학생의 신체상에 대한 만족정도와 성 역할 정체감 비교연구

  • Won, Kung-Hee (Kyunggii Do education hall, Department of the whole life physical education, School Health Division)
  • 원경희 (경기도교육청 평생교육체육과 학교보건담당)
  • Published : 2003.06.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find out the degree of satisfaction of body image and sex-role identity of primary school boys and girls and to examine their relevance between two sex groups. The data from study would be useful for mapping out some measures for school health education. Two hundred and forty five(245) students of 6th grade from 5 different primary schools in Seoul city and Gyonggi Province were selected for the study. The meaningful difference among demographic sociological characteristics between boys and girls has been shown to be in religion($x^2$=6.705, p=.044), the order of siblings($x^2$=7.455, p=.024), mother's academic career ($x^2$=6.705, p=.035) and the levels of living ($x^2$=4.108, p=.043). In the frequency distribution of sex-role identity, boys and girls were revealed as : undifferentiated 41.0%, 36.4%; as androgynous 24.8%, 25.8% respectively. Boys have masculinity (23.1%), on the other hand girls more feminity (22.7%). The meaningful difference of the degree of satisfaction of body image depends on father's ag(t=3.029, p=.050), mother's occupation(t=2.878, p=.023), home atmosphere(t=9.056, p=.000), level of livin(t=2.216, p=.028), academic achievements(t=4.580, p=.011). Masculine sex-role identity has shown its meaningful difference in mother's academic background(t=7.042, p=.001), academic achievements(t=14.963, p=.000). Feminine sex-role identity according to general characteristics shows meaningful difference in gender(t=2.683, p=.008), the order of siblings(t=3.019, p=0.51), father's academic career(t=5.558, p=.004) mother's academic background(t=7.676, p=.001), mother's occupation (t=3.405, p=.010), home atmosphere(t=4.492, p=.012), school performance(t=16.774, p=.000). Sex-role identity influences on the degree of satisfaction of body image as the relation bet ween the degree of satisfaction of body image and sex-role identity is pro correlative.

Keywords

References

  1. 김경희. 아동심리학. 서울:박영사;1989
  2. 김양진, 강혜원. 의복 및 신체만족도와 학업성취도가 사회적 자아존중감에 미치는 영향. 한국의류학회지 1992;16(2);34-36
  3. 변금순, 민성길, 김선아, 신극선. 미용성형수술과 정신건강. 신경정신의학 1999;94-104
  4. 안재현. 혈액투석 환자의 신체상과 자아존중감에 관한 연구. 이화여자대학교대학원 석사학위논문, 1996
  5. 이분옥. 초등학생의 신체상에 따른 절식행동 및 자아존중감에 관한 연구. 연세대학교대학원 석사학위논문, 1999
  6. 이수현. 비만 여중생의 신체상 만족도 및 폭식행동이 우울에 미치는 영향. 중앙대학교대학원 석사학위논문, 2000
  7. 임소연. 미용성형수술환자와 일반인의 신체상과 자아 존중감. 이화여자대학교대학원 석사학위논문, 2000
  8. 정현애. 성역할에 따른 중등교사의 여성에 대한 태도 연구. 전남대학교대학원 석사학위논문, 2000
  9. 지태옥. 사춘기 여학생들의 자기 신체 지각과 열등감. 경북대학교대학원 석사학위논문, 1997
  10. 조원정, 김진순, 김용순, 서문자, 이광옥, 김윤희, 이숙자. 성교육. 서울: 서울간호사회; 1996
  11. 차진희. 성역할 개념, 의복 성정체감, 유니섹스 의복에 대한 태도사이의 상관연구관계. 충남대학교대학원 석사학위논문, 1994
  12. 황효정. 인지-행동 및 명상프로그램이 청소년의 폭식과 신체상에 미치는 영향. 충남대학교대학원 석사학위논문, 1999
  13. Adams, G. R. Physical attractiveness research ; Toward a developmental social psychology of beauty. Hum Dev, 20, 217-239; 1977 https://doi.org/10.1159/000271558
  14. Bem, S. L. The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1974;42:155-162 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036215
  15. Benedict, R. Continuities and discontinuities in cultural conditioning. Psychiatry 1938;1: 161 -167 https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470515167.ch11
  16. Cash, T. F. et al. Body-image survey report: the American shape-up. PsychologyToday 1986; 20:30-44
  17. Dion, K. K.et al. What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality an Social Psychology 1982;24:285-290
  18. Franzoi, S. L. & Herzog, M. E. The body esteem scale: A convergent and discriminant validity study, Journal of Personality Assessment 1986;50(1): 24-31 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5001_4
  19. Freedman, R. J. Reflections on beauty as it relates to health in adolescent females. Health Care of the Female Adolescent 1984;9(3):29-45
  20. Freud Sigmoid/Translated by Toon Riviere. The ego and the id. New York: W, W, NORTON & Co;1961
  21. Kelly J. A. et al. Socially undesirable sexcorrelated characteristic: implications androgyny and adjustment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1977; 45(6):1185-1186 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.45.6.1185
  22. Mischel, W. Introduction to personality(4th ed). Harcourt Brace College Publishers;1986
  23. Nakdimen.K.A. The physio socionomic basis of sexual stereotyping. American Journal of Psy chiatry 1984;141(4):499-503 https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.141.4.499
  24. Norris, C.M. The professional nurse and body image, Behavioral concepts & nursing intervention, philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Co;1970
  25. Osmond, M. W. and Martin, P. Y. Sex and sexism : A comparison of male and female sex-role attitudes. Journal of Marriage and the Family 1975;37(4):744-758 https://doi.org/10.2307/350825
  26. Stuwart, A.L., & Brook, R. H. Effects of being overweight. American Journal of Public Health 1983;73:171-178 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.73.2.171
  27. Qualls, W. J. Household decision behavior: The impact of husbands and wives sex role orient ation. Journal of Consumer Research 1987;14(3):264-279 https://doi.org/10.1086/209111