Self-etching primer를 이용하여 접착된 교정용 브라켓의 전단결합강도

Shear bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets bonded with Self-Etching Primer

  • 안윤표 (전북대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 김효영 (전북대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 전영미 (전북대학교 치과대학 교정학교실, 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 김정기 (전북대학교 치과대학 교정학교실, 구강생체과학연구소)
  • Ahn, Yun-Pyo (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Institute of Oral Bioscience, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyo-Young (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Institute of Oral Bioscience, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Jeon, Young-Mi (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Institute of Oral Bioscience, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Ghee (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Institute of Oral Bioscience, Chonbuk National University)
  • 발행 : 2003.02.01

초록

본 연구는 6세대 교정용 접착 시스템인 Transbond Plus Self-Etching Primer(3M/Unitek Dental Products, Monorovia, Calif)를 이용하여 법랑질면에 브라켓을 접착하는 방법과, 통상적인 산부식 방법에 의해 브라켓를 접착한 경우의 전단결합강도 차이를 비교$\cdot$평가하고, self etching primer를 이용하여 브라켓을 접착할 때 치면에 존재하는 수분이 브라켓의 저단결합강도에 미치는 영향에 관하여 조사하였다. $37\%$ 인산용액과 Self-Etching Primer를 이 용하여 법랑질을 표면 처 리하고 Transbond XT를 이 용하여 브라켓을 치면에 부착하였다. 또한 수분의 존재에 따른 전단결합강포의 차이를 평가하기 위해 인공타액을 치면예 도보후 Self-Etching Primer를 사용하여 브라켓을 부착한 후 30분과 24시간에 따른 전단결합강도를 비교 평가하여 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. Self-etching primer군에서 건조군과 습윤군의 전단결합강도는 $37\%$인산처리군의 결합강도보다 낮았다(p<0.05). 그러나 Self-etching primer군의 전단결합강도는 일상적으로 유용한 수준의 이상이었다. 2. 모든군에서 24시간군의 전단결합강도가 30분군의 전단결합강도보다 높았으며 (p<0.05), 이는 브라켓 접착후 일정시간의 경과가 결합강도를 증가시켜 줌을 알 수 있었다. 3. Self-etcing primer군에서 습윤군의 전단결합강도는 건조군보다 높은 경향이었으나 통계적 유의성은 인정되지 않았다(P>0.05). 4 ARI 점수의 비교결과 인산처리군에서는 0점과 1점의 빈도가 높았으며, Self-etching primer 건조군과 습윤군에서는 2점과 3점의 빈도가 높아(p<0.05) Self-etching primer군이 인산처리군보다 법랑질-레진 접착계면부위에서의 파절이 많이 일어남을 알 수 있었다.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a self-etching primer on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets and on the failure pattern of bracket-adhesive interfaces in dry or wet condition. Brackets were bonded to extracted human teeth according to one of three experimental protocols. In the Group P, teeth were etched with $37\%$ phosphoric acid. After the Transbond XT Primer was applied onto the etched surfaces, the brackets were bonded with Transbond XT(3M, Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) and light cured for 40 seconds. In the Group SD, a self-etching primer(3M, Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) was placed on the enamel for 3 seconds and gently evaporated with air, as suggested by the manufacturer. The brackets were then bonded with Transbond XT as in the Group P In the Group SW, artificial saliva was applied to the enamel surface for 10 seconds to allow complete hydration of the surface before application self-etching primer The brackets were then bonded following the procedures of Group SD. Each group was divided into 2 sub-groups(0.5h, 24h) according to debonding time. Shear bond strengths were measured by Instron universal testing machine. After debonding, the teeth and brackets were examined under scanning electron microscope and assessed with the adhesive remnant index. The result obtained were summarized as follows ; 1. The shear bond strengths were high enough to use clinically in all testing groups, but the shear bond strengths of Group SD and SW were significantly lower than Group P(p<0.05). 2. With respect to comparison of debonding time, 24h debonding samples exhibited heigher shear bond strength than 0.5h debonding samples in Group P, SD and SW(p<0.05). 3. In the self etching primer groups(Group SD and Group SW), there was no significant difference in mean shear bond strength between under dry and wet state(p>0.05). 4. There was a greater frequency of ARI score of 0 and 1 with the Group P. On the other hand, there was a higher frequency of ARI scores of 2 and 3 with Group SD and Group SW(p<0.05).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Buonocore MG. A Simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surface. J Dent Res 1955 : 34 : 849-53
  2. Newman GV. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments : progress report. Am J Orthod. 1965: 51 : 901-12
  3. Proffit WR, Fields, Jr HW. Contemporary Orthodontics. 2nd edition. Mosby
  4. Miller RA. Laboratory and clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer. J Clin Orthod. 2001 : 35 : 42-5
  5. Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater. 2001 : 17 : 430-44
  6. Chigira H, Koike T, HasegawaT, Itoh K, Wakumoto S, Hayakawa T. Effect of the self etching dentin primers on the bonding efficacy of a dentin adhesive. Dent Mater. J. 1989 : 8 : 86-92
  7. Bishara SE, VonWald L, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Effect of a self-etch primer/adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2001 : 119 : 621-4
  8. Perdigao J, Lopes L, Lambrechts P. Effects of a self-etching primer on enamel shear bond strengths and SEM morphology. Am J Dent. 1997 : 10 : 141-6
  9. Imazato S, Imai T, Ebisu S. Antibacterial activity of proprietary self-etching primers. Am J Dent. 1998 : 11 : 106-8
  10. Bishara SE, Gordan VV, VonWald L, Jakobsen JR. Shear bond strength of composite, glass ionomer, and acidic primer adhesive systems. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1999 : 115 : 24-8
  11. Wang WN, Meng CL. A study of bond strength between light-and self-cured orthodontic resin. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1992 : 101 : 350-4
  12. Artun J, Bergland S, Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 1984 : 85 : 333-40
  13. Triolo PT Jr, Swift EJ Jr, Mudgil A, Levine A. Effect of etching time on enamel bond strengths, Am J Dent. 1993 : 6 : 302-4
  14. Lehman R and Davidson CL. Loss of surface enamel after acid etching procedures and its relation to fluoride content. Am J Orthod. 1981 : 80 : 73-82
  15. O'Reilly MM and Featherstone J. Demineralization and remineralization around orthodontic appliances : An in vivo study, Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1987 : 92 : 33-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(87)90293-9
  16. Zachrisson BU and Arthun J. Enamel surface appearance after various ebonding techniques. Am J Orthod. 1979 : 75 : 121-27
  17. Gwinnett AJ. Histological changes in human enamel following treatment with acidic adhesive conditioning agents, Arch Oral BioI. 1971 : 16 : 731-8
  18. Ashcraft DB, Staley RN, Jakobsen JR, Fluoride release and shear bond strengths of three light-cured glass ionomer cements. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 1997 : 111 : 260-5
  19. Bishara SE, Gordan VV. Effect of an acidic primer on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1998 : 114 : 243-7
  20. Aasen SM, Ario PD. Bonding systems : A comparison of maleic and phosphoric acids. J Dent Res 1993 : 72 : 137(Abstr 269)
  21. Berry TG, Barghi N, Knight GT, et al. Effectiveness of nitric NPG as a conditioning agent for enamel. Am J Dent. 1990 : 3 : 59-62
  22. 이영준, 박영국. Crystal growth에 의한 법랑질 표면처리가 교정용 브라켓 접착제의 전단결합강도에 미치는 영향. 대치교정지 1997 : 27 : 839-52
  23. Finger WJ, Fritz U. Laboratory evaluation of one component enamel/dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent. 1996 : 9 : 206-10
  24. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod.1975 : 2 : 171-8
  25. Bishara SE, Olsen ME, Damon P, Jakobsen JR. Evaluation of a new light-cured orthodontic bonding adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1998 : 114 : 80-7
  26. Grandhi RK,Combe EC,Speidel TM. Shear bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets with a moisture-insensitive primer. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2001 : 119 : 251-5
  27. Miyazaki M, Hirohata N, Takagaki K, Onose H, Moore BK. Influence of self-etching primer drying time on enamel bond strength of resin composites. J Dent. 1999 : 27 : 203-7
  28. Tavas MA, Watts DC. A visible light activated direct bonding material : an in vitro comparative study. Br J Orthod. 1984 : 11 : 33-7 https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.11.1.33
  29. Britton JC, McInnes P, Weinberg R, Ledoux WR, Retief DH. Shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1990 : 98 : 348-53 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81492-1