Shiftwork Duration and MetaboIic Risk Factors of Cardiovascular Disease

교대근무기간과 심혈관계질환의 대사성 위험요인

Ha, Mi-Na;Roh, Sang-Chul;Park, Jung-Sun
하미나;노상철;박정선

  • Published : 20030600

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the relationship between shiftwork duration and metabolic risk fac-tors on cardiovascular disease in shiftworkers. Methods: The study subjects comprised of 226 nurses, from a hospital, and 130 male work-ers, from a diaper and feminine hygienic material manufacturing firm The mean ages of the male workers and nurses were 29 and 28.5 years, respectively The fasting blood sugar, serum cholesterol, blood pressure, height and weight, waist and hip circumferences (only in nurses),and number of step for a shift as indices of physical activity were measured Using the Korean version of Karasek' s job contents questionnaire, the job stress was assessed information about the number of years worked, duration ofr shiftwork, and past medical and behavioral histories, including smoking, were obtained by self-administrated questionnaires Linear regression analy-ses were performed, to show the relationships between shiftwork duration and metabolic risk factors, using simple and multivariate models, adjusted for age, smoking, job strain and physical activity The following criteria were defined hypertension as a $SBP\ge 160$ or a $DBP\ge 90mmHg$ at least once, hypercholesterolemia, as a serum total $cholesterol\ge 240mg/dl$, obesity as BMI (Body Mass index) $\ge 25kg/m^2$ and central obesity as a WHR (Waist to Hip Ratio) $\ge$ 0.85;and the logistic regression analyses, according to years of shiftwork, were performed using Sim-pIe and adjusted models. Results The cholesterol and fasting blood sugar showed increasing trends, but without statisti-cal significances, according to the increase in shiftwork duration of the male workers, although, the increases in the blood pressure and BMI were statistically significant in the nurses, only the WHR showed a significant increase in relation to the shiftwork duration in the logistic regres-sion analyses, hypercholesterolemia and obesity showed significant increasing risks according to the number of years of shiftwork (OR=3.32 95%CI 1.27-8 72 and OR=3.21 95%CI 1.24-8.32respectively) in the male workers, but hypertension showed no significance in the nurses, only an increased central obesity was significant as a risk factor (OR=1 30 95%CI 1 05-1 62)Conclusions These results provide evidence of the associations between shiftwork and meta-bolic risk factors for cardiovascular disease, although healthy shiftworker effects might exist inour cross sectional study designKey Words Shiftwork, Blood sugar, Blood pressure, Obesity, Metabolic nsk factor

목적: 교대근무가 심혈관계 질환의 대사성 위험요인과 관련성을 가지고 있는지를 보고자 하였다. 방법: 1개 대학병원의 2 2 6명의 간호사 및 간호조무사, 134명의 제조업체 생산직 남성 근로자를 대상으로, 혈중 콜레스테롤, 혈압, 혈당, 비만지수(BMI) 및 중심성 비만지수(WHR) 등을 측정하여, 교대근무 기간에 대한 회귀분석 및 로지스틱 회귀분석을 시행하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 결과: 간호사에서는 혈중 콜레스테롤, 혈당, 혈압 및 비만지수와 교대근무 기간사이에는 유의한 양의 관련성이 관찰되지 않았고, 중심성 비만지수( W H R )와는 유의한 양의 관련성을 나타내었으며, 교대근무 기간의 상승이 중심성 비만의 위험도를 유의하게 상승시켰다. 이는 연령, 직무스트레스 및 신체적 활동도를 보정한 다변량 분석에서도 동일하였다. 남성 근로자에서는 혈압, 공복시 혈당, 비만지수가 회귀분석에서 유의한 양의 연관성을 보였으며, 고콜레스테롤혈증 및 비만의 유의한 발생위험도의 상승을 보여주었다. 결론: 본 연구 결과는 교대근무가 심혈관계 질환의 대사성 위험요인을 증가시킬 수 있음을 시사하는 것이며, 본 연구의 단면적 연구디자인으로 인하여 발생할 수 있는‘건강 교대근로자 효과’를 극복하기 위한 전향적 연구의 필요성을 제기한다고 하겠다.

Keywords

References

  1. Tenkane L, Sjoblom T, Kalino T, Alikoski T, Harma M. Shift work, occupation and coronary heart disease over a 6-years of follow up in the Helsinki Heart Study. Scand J Work Environ Health 1997: 23(4); 257-65.
  2. Monk TH. Shift work. In: Kryger MH, Roth T, Dement WC, eds. Principles and Practice of Sleep Medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders Company, 2000 ; 471-6.
  3. Park J, Paek D, Lee K-B, Rhee K-Y, Yi K-H. Shiftwork and sickness absence in Korean manufacturing industries. Korean J of Preventive Medicine 1994: 27(3); 475-86.
  4. Steenland K and Fine L. Shift work, shift change, and risk of death from heart disease at work. Am J Indust Med 1996: 29; 278-81.
  5. Knutsson A, Akerstedt T, Jonsson B, Orth-gomer K. Increased risk of ischemic heart disease in shift workers. Lancet 1986: 8498; 89-92.
  6. Akerstedt T, Knutsson A. Cardiovascular disease and shift work. Scand J work Environ Health 1997: 23; 241-2.
  7. WHO. Obesity, preventing and managing the global epidemic. In Report of a WHO consultation on obesity. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 1998
  8. Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B . The Job content Questionnaire(JCQ): An Instrument for Internationally Comparative Assessments of Psychosocial Job Characteristics. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 1998: 3(4); 322-55.
  9. Assmann G, Cullen P, Jossa F, Lewis B, Manchini M. Coronary heart disease: Reducing the risk: The scientific background to primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease a worldwide view. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1999: 19(8); 1819-24.
  10. Boggild H and Knutsson A. Shiftwork, risk factors and cardiovascular disease. Scand J work Environ Health 1999: 25; 85-99.
  11. Neidhammer I, Lert F, Marne M-J. Prevalence of overweight and weight gain in relation to night work in nurses’cohort. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1996: 20; 625-33.
  12. Boggild H, Suadicani P, Hein H et al. Shiftwork, social class and ischemic heart disease in middle aged and elderly men: a 22 year follow up in the Copenhagen male study. Occup Environ Med 1999: 56; 640-5.
  13. Nakamura K, Shimai S, Kikuchi S et al. Shiftwork and risk factors for coronary heart disease in Japanese blue-collar workers: serum lipids and anthropometric characteristics. Occup Med 1997: 47; 142-6.
  14. LGPM van Amelsvoort, Schouten FG and Kok FJ. Duration of shiftwork related to body mass index and waist to hip ratio. Int J Obesity 1999:23; 973-8.
  15. Kawachi I, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willet WC, Manson JE, Speizer FE, Hennekens CH. Prospective study of shift work and risk of coronary heart disease in women. Circulation 1995:92; 3178-82.
  16. Karlsson B, Knutsson A and Lindahl B. Is there an association between shift work and having a metabolic syndrome? Results from a population based study of 27,458 people. Occup Environ Med 2001: 58; 747-52. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.58.11.747