Growth Performance and Adaptation of Liriodendron tulipofera in Korea

우리나라에 植栽한 백합나무의 適應力과 生長에 關한 硏究

Ryu, Keun-Ok;Jang, Suk-Seong;Choi, Wan-Yong;Kim, Hong-Eun
류근옥;장숙성;최완용;김홍은

  • Published : 20030000

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine the growth performance and the adaptability of Liriodendron tulipifera L. in Korea. L. tulipifera was introduced from the North America and planted at six stands for adaptation test. The test stands were classified into three sites such as a good, moderate, and poor site depending on soil textures etc. At each site, three plot (20m x 20m) per location were set up and the growth performance was investigated. The average volume growth per ha for all six plantations was 321m, which was similar to that of original habitat in the USA. This suggests that L. tulipifera is well adapted to Korean environment. The growth performance of Waniu, which showed the highest volume growth per ha among the six plantations, showed 4.8 times greater than that of Kwangneung, which showed the lowest volume growth. This difference was due mainly to better atmospheric humidity soil humidity and depth, and clay content. The growth of L. tulipifera was 90% superior to that of Larix kaempferi and Pinus strobus at Chuncheon and Wanju, which were located even at 350-400m above the sea level with steep slope and high ridge. The stem analysis of L. tulipifera showed slow growth until the age of 15-20, but grew rapidly after then.

Keywords

References

  1. 김동구. 2000. '독림가가 평가한 백합나무',백합나무육성 보급을 위한 심포지움 자료집.산림청 임업연구원. pp. 25-36
  2. 김외정 . 2002. 우리나라 육성임업의 재평가와추U1방향. 임업연구원. 육성임업 활성화 현장세미나자료집 . pp. 33-52
  3. 노의래. 1982. Path analysis에 의한 Populusalb$a^x$ Poputus glandutosa F clone의 적지 판정에 관한 연구. 임목육종연구보고서 18 : 113-156
  4. 박경석 . 2000. '백합나무의 경영적 고찰', 백합나무육성 보급을 위한 심포지움 자료집. 산림청 임업연구원. pp. 37-62
  5. 산림청 . 2000. 산림과 임업기술(III)산림경영.산림 청 . 755p
  6. 산림청 . 2001. 세계일류의 산림복지국가를 향한 21세기 산림비젼. 산림청 . 26p
  7. 유근옥. 1998. 스트로브잣나무 산지별 생장 및침엽의 특성 . 충북대학교 대학원 석사논문.38p
  8. 임업연구원. 2002a. 임업경제동향. 임업연구원.p. 91
  9. 임업연구원. 2002b. 표준임업시험실시요령
  10. Beck, D. E. 1962. Yellow-poplar site indexcurves. USDA Forest Service, Research Note180. Southeastem Forest Experiment Station,Asheville, NC. 2p
  11. Beck, D. E. 1990. In Silvics of NorthAmerica Volume 2, Hardwoods. p. 406-416.Russell M. B. and Barbara H. H.(eds.)USDA, Agriculture Handbook No. 654. Washington, D.C
  12. Beck, D. E. and D. B. Lino. 1970. Yield ofunthinned yellow-poplar. USDA Forest Service,Research Paper SE-58. Southeastem ForestExjperiment Station, Asheville, NC. 20p
  13. Beck, D. E. and D. B. Lino. 1975. Board-footand diameter yellow-popular after thinning.USDA Forest Service Res. Pap. SE-123, 20p.Southeast. For. Exp. Stn., Asheville, N. C
  14. Beck, D. E. and D. B. Lino. 1981. Yellow-poplar : Characteristics and Management.USDA Forest Service. Agriculture HandbookNo. 583. Washington, D.C. 90p
  15. Bonner, F. T. and T. E. Rusell. 1974.Liriodendron tuhpifera L. Yellow Poplar. InSeeds of woody plants in the United States.P. 508-511. USDA Agriculture Handbook450p
  16. David, E. C. R. 2002. Bulletin of hardwoodmarket statistics : 1989 - 2000. USDA ForSer Northeastem Res. Station Res. Note NE375. 22p
  17. Doolittle, W. T. 1958. Site index comparisonsfor several forest species in the SouthemAppalachians. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 22.455-458 https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1958.03615995002200050023x
  18. Hemandez, R., J. F. Davalos, S. Sonti, Y. Kim and R. Moody. 1997. Strength andstrength of reinforced yellow-popular glued-laminated beams. USDA Forest Serv. Res.Pap. Fp1-RP-554. 28p
  19. Ike, A. F., Jr. and C. D. Huppuch. 1968.Predicting tree height growth from soil andtopographic site factors in the Georgia BlueRidge Mountains. Georgia Forest ResourcesCouncil, Research Paper 54. Mamcom. 11 p
  20. Kretschmann, D. E., J. G. Isebrands, F.Stanosz, J. R., Dramm, A. Olstad, D. Coleand J. Samsel. 1999. Structrual lumberproperties of hybrid poplar. USDA ForestServ. Res. Pap. FPL-RP-573. 5p
  21. Liberty H. B. and E. Z. Bailey. 1976. HortusThird. A. Concise Dictionary of PlantsCultivated in United States and Canada.Macmillan Publishing Company New Yorkand Collier Macmillan Publishers London. p.1290
  22. Lino, D. B. and D. F. Olson, Jr. 1961. Soilsite studies in Piedmont hardwood and pinehardwood upland forests. Forest Science 7 :320-329
  23. McCarthy, E. F. 1933. Yellow-poplar Characteristics, growth and management. U.S.Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin356. Washington, D.C. 58p
  24. Olson, D. F., Jr. and D. B. Lino. 1959. Siteindex comparisons for several tree species inthe Virginia-Carolina Piedmont. USDA For. Serv., South-east. For. Exp. Stn. Pap. 104,9p. Asheville, N. C
  25. Parks, C. R., N. G. Miller, J. F. Wendel,and K. M. McDougal. 1983. Genetic divergencewithin the Genus Linodendron (Magnoliaceae).Annual Missouri Botany 70 : 658-666 https://doi.org/10.2307/2398983
  26. Parks, C. R. and J. F. Wendel. 1990.Molecular divergence between Asian andNorth American species of Liriodendron(Magnoliaceae) with implications for interpre-tation of fossil floras. American Journal ofBotany 77(10) : 1243-1256 https://doi.org/10.2307/2444585
  27. Parks, C. R., J. F. Wendel, M. M. Sewelland Y. L. Qiu. 1990. Genetic control isozymevariation in the Genus Lirodendron L.(Magnoliaceae). The Joumal of Heredity 81(4) :317-323 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a110996
  28. Parks, C. R., J. F. Wendel., M. M. Sewell,and Y. L. Qiu. 1994. The significance ofallozyme variation and introgression in theLiriodendron tulifnfera complex (Magnoliaceae).Amehcan Journal of Botany 81(7) : 878-889 https://doi.org/10.2307/2445769
  29. Phillips, J. J. 1966. Site index of yellow-poplar related to soil and topography insouthern New Hersey. USDA Forest Service,Research Paper Ne-52. Northeastem ForestExperiment Station, BRoomall. PA. lOp
  30. Smalley, G. W. 1964. Topography, soil, andthe height of planted yellow-poplar. Joumal ofAlabama Academy of Science 35 : 39-44