Journal of Veterinary Science

The Korean Society of Veterinary Science (대한수의학회)
권호 표지

Effects of Corticosteroid and Electroacupuncture on Experimental Spinal Cord Injury in Dogs

Yang, Jung-Whan;Jeong, Seong-Mok;Seo, Kang-Moon;Nam, Tchi-Chou

  • Published : 20030000
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of electroacupuncture, corticosteroid, and combination of two treatments on ambulatory paresis due to spinal cord injury in dogs by comparing therapeutic effects of electroacupuncture and corticosteroid. Spinal cord injury was induced in twenty healthy dogs (2.5-7 kg and 2-4 years) by foreign body insertion which compressed about 25%of spinal cord. There was no conscious proprioception, no extensor postural thrust, and ambulatory. Dogs were divided into four groups according to the treatment; corticosteroid (group A), electroacupuncture (group B), corticosteroid and electroacupuncture (group AB), and control (group C). Neurological examination was performed everyday to evaluate the spinal cord dysfunction until motor functions were returned to normal. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were measured for objective and accurate evaluations. The latency in measured potentials was converted into the velocity for the evaluation of spinal cord dysfunctions. Pain perceptions were normal from pre-operation to 5 weeks after operation. Recovery days of conscious proprioception in groups A, B, AB, and C were 21.2${\times}$8.5 days, 19.8${\times}$4.3 days, 8.2${\times}$2.6 days, and 46.6${\times}$3.7 days, respectively. Recovery days of extensor postural thrust in group A, group B, group AB, and group C were 12.8${\times}$6.8 days, 13.8${\times}$4.8 days, 5.4${\times}$1.8 days, and 38.2${\times}$4.2 days, respectively. There were no significant differences between group A and group B. However, recovery days of group AB was significantly shorter than that of other groups and that of group C was significantly delayed (P<0.05). Conduction velocities of each group were significantly decreased after induction of spinal cord injury on SEPs (p<0.05) and they showed a tendency to return to normal when motor functions were recovered. According to these results, it was considered that the combination of corticosteroid and electroaeupuncture was the most therapeutically effective for ambulatory paresis due to spinal cord injury in dogs.

Keywords

References

  1. Altman, S. Techniques and instrumentation. Problems in Vet. Med. 1992, 4, 66-87. 1
  2. Andy, S., Richard, W. R. and Charles, D. K. Spinal-evoked potentials in dogs with acute compressive thoracolumbar spinal cord disease. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1987, 48, 1525-1530.
  3. Bellah, D. Jr. Colonic perforation after corticosteroid and surgical treatment of intervertebral disc disease in a dog. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1983, 183, 1002-1003.
  4. Bitetto, W. V. and Brown, N. O. Selection of the appropriate surgical approach for intervertebral disc disease. Problems in Vet. Med. 1989, 1, 415-433.
  5. Braughler, J. M., Hall, E. D. and Means, E. D. Evaluation of an intensive methylprednisolone sodium succinate dosing regimen in experimental spinal cord injury. J. Neurosurg. 1987, 67, 102-105.
  6. Braund, K. G. Disease mechanisms in small animal surgery, pp 960-970. 2nd ed. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, 1993.
  7. Butterworth, S. J. and Denny, H. R. Follow up study of 100 cases with thoracolumbar disc protrusions treated by lateral fenestration. J. Sm. Anim. Prac. 1991, 32, 443-447.
  8. Davies, J. V. and Sharp, N. J. H. A comparison of conservative treatment and fenestration for thoracolumbar intervertebral disc disease in the dog. J. Sm. Anim. Prac. 1983, 24, 721-729.
  9. Faden, A. J., Jacobs, T. P. and Patrick, D. H. Megadose corticosteroid therapy following experimental traumatic spinal injury. J. Neurosurg. 1984, 60, 712-717.
  10. Hoerlein, B. F., Redding, R. W., Mcguire, J. A. and Hoff, E. J. Evaluation of dexamethasone, DMSO, mannitol, and solcoseryl in acute spinal cord trauma. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 1983, 19, 216-226.
  11. Holliday, R. W., Weldon, N. E. and Ealand, B. G. Percutaneous recording of evoked spinal cord potentials of dogs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1979, 40, 326-333.
  12. Jadeson, W. J. Intervertebral disk lesions. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1961, 138, 411-423.
  13. Janssens, L. A. Acupuncture for the treatment of thoracolumbar and cervical disc disease in the dog. Problems in Vet. Med. 1992, 4, 107-116.
  14. Janssens, L. A. Prolapse of thoracolumbar disc: A contraindication for electroacupuncture in dogs. Am. J. Acupunct. 1986, 14, 61-64.
  15. Janssens, L. A. and de Prins, M. E. Treatment of thoracolumbar disc disease in dogs by means of acupuncture: A comparison of two techniques. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 1989, 25, 169-174.
  16. McKee, W. M. A comparison of hemilaminectomy (with concomitant disc fenestration) and dorsal laminectomy for the treatment of thoracolumbar disc protrusion in dogs. Vet. Rec. 1992, 130, 296-300.
  17. Moore, R. W. and Withrow, S.J. Gastrointestinal hemorrhage and pancreatitis associated with intervertebral disc disease in the dog. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1982, 180, 1443-1447.
  18. Poncelet, L., Delauche, A. and Vinals, C. Effect of bilateral tibial nerve stimulation on the spinal evoked potential in dogs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1992, 53, 1305-1308.
  19. Poncelet, L., Michawx, C. and Balligard, M. Somatosensory potentials in dogs with naturally acquired thoracolumbar spinal cord disease. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1993, 54, 1935-1941.
  20. Scott, H. W. Hemilaminectomy for the treatment of thoracolumbar disc disease in the dog: a follow-up study of 40 cases. J. Sm. Anim. Prac. 1997, 38, 488-494.
  21. Smith, F. W. K. Jr. Neurophysiologic basis of acupuncture. Problems in Vet. Med. 1992, 4, 34-52.
  22. Sorjonen, D. C., Dillon, A. R. and Powers, R. D. Effects of dexamethasone and surgical hypotension on the stomach of dogs: clinical, endoscopic and pathologic evaluations. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1983, 44, 1233-1237.
  23. Wheeler, S. J. Diagnosis of spinal disease in dogs. J. Sm. Anim. Prac. 1989, 30, 81-91.