The Postoperative Prognosis of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction according to the Appearance of the Ureter of Preoperative Retrograde Pyelography

신우요관이행부폐색에서 술 전 역행성 신우조영술의 요관형태에 따른 수술적 치료의 경과

Kim, Jae-Wook;Han, Sang-Won;Choi, Seung-Kang
김재욱;한상원;최승강

  • Published : 20030600

Abstract

Purpose: Controversy still exists about the necessity for a preoperative RGP (retrograde pyelography) in UPJO (ureteropelvic junction obstruction), but no standard has been established. Therefore, to define the role of preoperative RGP in UPJO, the postoperative prognosis, using the appearance of the ureter in preoperative RGP, was studied. Materials and Methods: Between Jan. 1996 and Oct. 2001, the radiological studies of 38 children (mean age: 10.66 months), out of 77 diagnosed with UPJO followed by pyeloplasty, were available for a retrospective review. The subjects were divided into three groups: -group A; UPJ (ureteropelvic junction) narrowing only, group B; multiple narrowing, and group C; a hypoplastic ureter, based on the findings of the preoperative RGP. The improvements in the hydronephrosis, according to the comparison between the preoperative and postoperative U/S (ultrasonography), performed at 6 and 12 months after the operation, were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The number of patients in the groups A, B and C were 15 (16 renal units, one bilateral UPJO), 11 and 12 (13 renal units, one bilateral UPJO), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the degree of preoperative hydronephrosis (mean${\pm}$S.D., p>0.5). The degree of hydronephrosis (mean${\pm}$S.D.) found at the U/S 6 and 12 month follow ups were 2.00${\pm}$0.63 and 1.63${\pm}$0.50, 1.91${\pm}$0.70, and 1.45${\pm}$ 0.52 and 2.92${\pm}$0.76 and 2.62${\pm}$0.77 in groups A, B and C, respectively, with all showing improvements. There were statistically significant differences in the degree of improvement in group C compared to groups A and B (p<0.05). Conclusions: The current study has shown that hydronephrosis, with a hypoplastic ureter, has a tendency to improve more slowly than other types of ureteral narrowing. Therefore, if the long-term follow-up data show the same results, a preoperative RGP may play an important role in evaluating the postoperative prognosis of UPJO.

Keywords

References

  1. Fembach SK, Maizels M, Conway JJ. Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to he system used by the Society for Fetal Urology. Pediatr Radiol 1993;23:478 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02012459
  2. Williams DI, Kenawi MM. The prognosis of pelviureteric obstruction in childhood: A review of 190 cases. Eur Urol 1976;2:57-63 https://doi.org/10.1159/000471963
  3. Sheldon CA, Duckett JW, Snyder HM. Evolution in the management of infant pyeloplasty. J Pediatr Surg 1992;27:501-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3468(92)90347-A
  4. Martin AK, Richard ME. Management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in neonate. Pediatr Urol 1988;31:496-9
  5. Rushton HG, Salem Y, Belman AB, Majd M. Is routine retrograde pyelography necessary? J Urol 1994;152:604-6
  6. Bachor R, Kleinschmidt K, Gottfried HW, Hautmann R. Is retrograde ureteropyelography prior to pyeloplasty necessary in children? Urologe A 1997;36:335-8
  7. Cockrell SN, Hendren WH. The importance of visualizing the ureter before performing a pyeloplasty. J Urol 1990;2:588-92
  8. Stein R, Ikoma F, Salge S, Miyanaga T, Mori Y. Pyeloplasty in hydronephrosis: examination of surgical results from a morphologic point of view. Int J Urol 1996;3:348-55 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.1996.tb00552.x
  9. Neste MG, Du Cret RP, Finlay DE, Sane S, Gonzalez R, Boudreau RJ, et al. Postoperative diuresis renography and ultrasound in patients undergoing pyeloplasty: predictors of surgical outcome. Clin Nucl Med 1993;18:872-6 https://doi.org/10.1097/00003072-199310000-00010
  10. Amling CL, O'Hara SM, Wiener JS, Schaeffer CS, King LR. Renal ultrasound changes after pyeloplasty in children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term outcome in 47 renal units. J Urol 1996;156:2020-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65424-7
  11. Tapia J, Gonzalez R. Pyeloplasty improves renal function alii somatic growth in children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 1995;154:218-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)67280-X
  12. Palmer LS, Maizels M, Cartwright PC, Fernbach SK, Conway JJ. Surgery versus observation for managing obstructive grade 3 to 4 unilateral hydronephrosis: a report from the Society for Fetal Urology. J Urol 1998;159:222-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64072-2
  13. Allen TD, Husmann DA. Ureteopelvic junction obstruction associated with ureteral hypoplasia. J Urol 1989;142:353-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)38755-4
  14. Chertin B, Fridmans A, Knizhrik M, Hadas-Halperin I, Hain D, Farkas A. Does early detection of ureteropelvic junction obstruction improve surgical outcome in terms of renal function? J Urol 1999;162:1037-40
  15. Ulman I, Jayanthi VR, Koff SA. The long-term followup of newborns with severe unilateral hydronephrosis initially treated nonoperatively. J Urol 2000;164:1101-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67262-X
  16. McAleer 1M, Kaplan GW. Renal function before and after pyeloplasty: Does it improve? J Urol 1999;162:1041-4
  17. Comford PA, Rickwood AMK. Functional results of pyeloplasty in patients with ante-natally diagnosed pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction. BJU Int 1998;81:152-5 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00519.x
  18. DiSandro MJ, Kogan BA. Neonata management: role for early intervention. Urol Clin N Amer 1998;25:187-97 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70007-0
  19. Leiter E. Persistent fetal ureter. J Urol 1979;122:251-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)56352-1
  20. Michael C. Carr. Anomalies and surgery of the ureteropelvic junction in children. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED Jr, Wein AJ, editors. Campbell's urology. 8th ed. Philladelphia Saunders; 2002;1995-2006
  21. Maizels M, Stephens FD. Valves of the ureter as a cause of primary obstruction of the ureter: anatomic, embryologic and clinical aspects. J Urol 1980;123:742-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)56113-3
  22. Jolmston JH. The pathogenesis of hydronephrosis in children BJU Int 1969;41:724-34