The Influence of Leadership of Commercial Sport Organization on the Empowerment and Organizational Commitment

상업스포츠조직 경영자의 리더십이 임파워먼트 및 조직몰입에 미치는 영향

Ko, Eun-Ha
고은하

  • Published : 20030000

Abstract

This study was to examine a structural model of relationship among leadership of sport administrators and empowerment and organizational commitment. The purpose of this study was to clarify the suitability on a theory model of the leadership, empowerment and commitment, and was to explore the interactions between each variables. The subjects of this study were staffs working at commercial sports centers in Seoul, Using random sampling method, 230 subjects were selected. The reliability and validity of the questionnaires were checked up by the confirmatory factor analysis and reliability analysis. To analyze the data collected for this study, SPSSWIN 11.0 program were used for correlation analysis and regression analysis. On the basis of the method and process, the conclusions were drawn as follows; First, the leadership significantly influenced the degree of empowerment. When the leadership of administrators of commercial sport organizations is more transactional and transformational, the authority and autonomy, impact, and competence of organization members are extended. Second, the leadership contributed significant influence on organizational commitment. The more transactional and transformational leadership of administrators of commercial sport organizations were shown, the more organization members showed a commitment to the organization. Third, the empowerment contributed significant influence on organizational commitment. When the authority and autonomy, impact, and competence of organization members were extended, the organizational commitment of members to the organization was improved.

Keywords

References

  1. 권중생(2000). 변혁적, 조직문화 및 구성원의 방어적 행동의 관계. 상업경제연구 제 13권 제 2호, 157-176
  2. 김금수(2000). 임파워먼트가 조직성과에 미치는 영향. 대한경영학회지 제25호, 75-100
  3. 김영준(2003). 상업스포츠조직의 근무환경 및 조직문화가 임파워먼트 및 조직성과에 미치는 영향. 한국체육학회지 제 41권 제 5호, 387-398
  4. 김호정(2001). 변혁적. 거래적 리더십이 조직몰입에 미치는 영향. 한국행정학보 제 35권 제 2호, 197-216
  5. 박현태(1997). 간호조직에서 리더십 유형과 직무만족, 조직몰입에 관한 연구. 대한간호학회지 제 27권 제 1호, 228-241
  6. 백종철. 김영국. 윤지환(2002). 호텔기업의 리더십 유형이 구성원의 임파워먼트와 조직몰이벵 미치는 영향. 관광학연구 제 26권, 제 2호, 72-95
  7. 이용탁(1996). 거래적. 벽혁적 리더십이 조직 유효성에미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 부산대학교 대학원. 박사학위논문
  8. 최종진(1996). 스포츠조직의 리더십이 조직몰입에 미치는 영향, 한국스포츠행정경영학회지 창간호,163-175
  9. 홍상태(2000). 경영자의 러더십이 조직유효성에 미치는영향에 관한 연구. 인적자원관리연구 창간호,27-53
  10. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W.(1988). The effect of sampling error on convergpnce, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155-173
  11. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J.(1985). Quantitative description of world-class industrial, political leaders. SUNY at Binghamton, New York
  12. Bennis, W. G., & Nanus, B.(1985), Leaders, the strategic for taking charge. New York : Haber and Row
  13. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N.(1998). The Empowerment process : Intergrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13, 471-842
  14. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C.(1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings, eth ed. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
  15. House, R. J.(1995). The change nature of work : Leadership in the twenty-first century. The Joessey-Bass Management Series
  16. Keller, T.(1995). Leadership and empowerment : A social exchange perceptive. Human Relation, 48(2), 127-145
  17. Ko, R., Glisson, C.(1997). The study of turnover. Ames, lowa State Univ. Press
  18. Msyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J.(1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(4)
  19. Shulman, G. M., & House, M.(1996). The development of a leaner empowerment. Communication Education, 45
  20. Spreitzer, G. M.(1995). Individual empowerment in the workplace. Dimensions. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465
  21. Spreitzer, G. M.(1996). Social structural charactenstics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 483-504