The Korean Journal of Pain

The Korean Pain Society (대한통증학회)
권호 표지

Analysis of Methods for Pain Measurement Used in Journal of the Korean Pain Society

대한통증학회지에 게재된 논문들에서 사용된 통증 측정 방법에 대한 분석

Kim, Yong-Ik;Lee, Won-Sup;Park, Hae-Nam;Chae, Won-Seok;Jin, Hee-Cheol;Lee, Jeong-Seok;Hwang, Kyung-Ho
김용익;이원섭;박해남;채원석;진희철;이정석;황경호

  • Published : 20030000
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: The measurement of pain is an important aspect in pain management. It was thought that an analysis of the methods of pain measurement would be helpful for improving the quality of the journal Methods: Three hundred and eighty seven articles, related to pain measurement, were included in this study. The articles, which are used in all kinds of pain measurement methods, and their distinct explanations were analyzed. Additionally, the followings were recorded: the frequency of the use of the methods of pain measurement, number of educational and original articles on pain measurement and the kinds of end-phrases used for visual analogue scales (VAS). Results: Two hundred and eighty five (71.8%) of the 387 articles mentioned methods of pain measurement. There were 31.2% of the articles that explained the methods distinctly. The VAS (0-10). as a method. and

Keywords

References

  1. McGuire DB: Comprehensive and multidimensional assessment and measurement of pain.J Pain Symptom Manage 1992; 7: 312-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-3924(92)90064-O
  2. Rosier EM, Iadarola MJ, Coghill RC: Reproducibility of pain measurement and pain perception. Pain 2002; 98: 205.16
  3. Huskisson EC: Visual Analogue Scales. Pain Measurement and Assessment, 1st ed. Edited by Melzack R. New York. Raven Press. 1983, 33-7
  4. Scott J, Huskisson EC: Vertical or horizontal visual analogue scales. Ann. Rheum Dis 1980; 38: 560 https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.38.6.560
  5. McCaffery M, Pasero CL: Pain ratings: the ftfth vital sign. Am J Nurs 1997; 97: 15-6 https://doi.org/10.2307/3465480
  6. Seymour RA, Simpson JM, Charlton IE, Phillips ME: An evaluation of length and end-phrase of visual analogue scales in dental pain. Pain 1985; 21: 177-85 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(85)90287-8
  7. de C Williams AC, Davies HT. Chadury Y: Simple pain rating scales hide complex idiosyncratic meanings. Pain 2000; 85: 457-63 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00299-7
  8. Clark WC, Yang JC, Tsui SL, Ng KF, Clark SB: Unidimensional pain rating scales: a mullidimensional affect and pain survey (MAPS) analysis of whal they really measure. Pain 2002; 98: 241-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00474-2
  9. Kremer E, Atkinson JH, Ignelzi RJ: Measurement of pain: patient preference does not confound pain measurement Pain 1981; 10: 241-8
  10. 김용익, 남상구, 홍승택, 강규식, 박 욱: 수술 후 통증평가를 위한 Visual Analogue Scale. Categorical Scale 그리고 환자 만족도와의 비교. 대한통증학회지 2001; 14: 156-63
  11. 김용익, 김상현, 이주철, 전재수, 황경호, 박 욱: Visual Analogue Scal과- R (III) Nociceptive Flexion Reflex 와의 상관관계. 대한통증학회지 2000; 13: 175-81
  12. 김태현: 통증의 평가. 대한통증학회지 1988; 1: 137-44
  13. Ishizaki K: 약물 부하 시험에 의한 만성 통증의 평가. 대한통증학회지 1997; 10: 1-4
  14. 한태형: 통증의 평가. 대한통증학회 춘계 연수교육. 대한통증학회 1998, pp 7-20