Bacterial Community Composition of Activated Sludge Relative to Type and Efficiency of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants

  • Ahn, In-Sook (Toxic and Refractory Wastwater Treatment Lab., Ecodigms Co. Ltd., EERC, KIST) ;
  • Kim, Myeong-Woon (Department of Environmental Engineering, Daejin University) ;
  • La, Hyun-Joon (Toxic and Refractory Wastwater Treatment Lab., Ecodigms Co. Ltd., EERC, KIST) ;
  • Choi, Kyung-Min (Toxic and Refractory Wastwater Treatment Lab., Ecodigms Co. Ltd., EERC, KIST) ;
  • Kwon, Joong-Cheon (Toxic and Refractory Wastwater Treatment Lab., Ecodigms Co. Ltd., EERC, KIST)
  • Published : 2003.02.01

Abstract

Two microbial communities of activated sludge in the same municipal wastewater, but treated with different systems, were studied and compared using molecular microbiological approaches. The bacterial 16S rDNA sequences from 124 clones were analyzed, however, the majority of them were not closely related to any known species, and found to belong to 8 different phylogenetic groups and 3 different unidentified groups. The relative frequencies of each group were similar between the two microbial communities. Fingerprinting using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) showed that the putative Nitrospira-related populations were more diverse and quantitatively higher in the KNR process system than in the other system using a conventional activated sludge process. The relationship between the bacterial community composition and the higher removal efficiency of nitrogen and phosphorus in the KNR process is discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. J. Mol. Biol. v.215 Basic local alignment search tool Altschul S. F.;W. Miller;E. W. Meyers;D. J. Limpman
  2. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater(19th ed.) American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation American Public Health Association;A. D. Eaton (ed.);L. S. Clesceri (ed.);A. E. Greenberg (ed.)
  3. Wastewater Microbiology Bitton G.
  4. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. v.28 Thermophilic bacterial communities in hot composts as revealed by most probable number counts and molecular (16S rDNA) methods Blanc M.;L. Marilley;T. Beffa;M. Aragno https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.1999.tb00569.x
  5. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. v.65 Identification of some of the major groups of bacteria in efficient and nonefficient biological phosphorus removal activated sludge systems Bond P. L.;R. Erhart;M. Wagner;J. Keller;L. L. Blackall
  6. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. v.24 Molecular analysis of ammonia oxidation and denitrification in natural environments Bothe H.;G. Jost;M. Schloter;B. B. Ward;K. Witzel https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2000.tb00566.x
  7. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. v.12 Isolation and identification of photosynthetic bacterium useful for wastewater treatment Choi H. P.;H. J. Kang;H. C. Seo;H. C. Sung
  8. J. Microbiol. Methods v.31 Therminal restriction fragment patterns (TRFLPs), a rapid, PCR-based method for the comparison of complex bacterial communities Clement B. G.;L. E. Kehl;K. L. DeBord;C. L. Kitts https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(97)00105-X
  9. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. v.66 Identification of polyphosphate-accumulating organisms and design of 16S rRNA-directed probes for their detection and quantitation Crocetti G. R.;P. Hugenholtz;P. L. Bond;A. Schuler;J. Keller;D. Jenkins;L. L. Blackall https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.3.1175-1182.2000
  10. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. v.67 Phylogenetic specificity and reproducibility and new method for analysis of terminal restriction fragment profiles of 16S rRNA genes from bacterial community Dunbar J.;L. O. Ticknor;C. R. Kuske https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.1.190-197.2001
  11. Cladistics v.5 PHYLIP Phylogeny Inference Package (version 3.2) Felsenstein J.
  12. Microb. Ecol. v.37 Identification of cultureable oligotrophic bacteria within naturally occurring bacterioplankton communities of the Ligurian Sea by 16S rRNA sequencing and probing Giuliano L.;M. De Domenico;E. De Domenico;M. G. Hofle;M. M. Yakimov https://doi.org/10.1007/s002489900132
  13. Microb. Ecol. v.35 Microbial evolution, diversity and ecology: A decade of ribosomal RNA analysis of uncultivated microorganisms Head I. M.;J. R. Saunders;R. W. Pickup https://doi.org/10.1007/s002489900056
  14. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. v.23 Detection and cultivation of filamentous bacteria from activated sludge Kamper P. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6496(97)00030-5
  15. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. v.37 Distribution and ecophysiology of the nitrifying bacteria emphasizing cultured species Koops H. P.;A. P. Roser https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00847.x
  16. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. v.27 Community analysis of ammonia-oxidising bacteria in relation to oxygen availability in soils and root-oxygenated sediments, using PCR, DGGE and oligonucleotide probe hydridisation Kowalchuk G. A.;P. L. E. Bodelier;G. H. J. Heilig;J. R. Stephen;H. J. Laanbroek https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.1998.tb00550.x
  17. Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics 16S/23S rRNA sequencing Lane D. J.;E. Stackebrandt (ed.);M. Goodfellow (ed.)
  18. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. v.12 Characterization of TCE-degrading bacteria and their application to wastewater treatment Lee W. S.;C. S. Park;J. E. Kim;B. D. Yoon;H. M. Oh
  19. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. v.63 Characterization of microbial diversity by determining terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms of genes encoding 16S rRNA Liu W. T.;T. L. Marsh;H. Cheng;L. J. Forney
  20. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. v.66 Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis program, a web-based research tool for microbial community analysis Marsh T. L.;P. Saxman;J. Cole;J. Tiedje https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.8.3616-3620.2000
  21. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. v.65 Optimization of terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis for complex marine bacterioplankton communities and comparison with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis Moeseneder M. M.;J. M. Arrieta;G. Muyzer;C. Winter;G. J. Herndl
  22. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. v.65 Identification of a novel group of bacteria in sludge from a deteriorated biological phosphorus removal reactor Nielsen A. T.;W. T. Liu;C. Filipe;L. Grady Jr.;S. Molin;D. A. Stahl
  23. Wat. Sci. Tech. v.37 Bioaugmentation of sequencing batch reactor for biological phoshphorus removal: Comparative rRNA sequence analysis and hybridization with oligonucleotide probes Oerther D. B.;J. Danalewich;E. Dulekgurgen;E. Leveque;D. L. Freedman;L. Raskin https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00148-6
  24. Mol. Biol. Evol. v.4 The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees Saitou N.;M. Nei
  25. Microbiology v.141 Molecular characterization of nocardioform actinomycetes in activated sludge by 16S rRNA analysis Schuppler M.;F. Mertens;G. Schon;U. B. Gobel https://doi.org/10.1099/13500872-141-2-513
  26. Nucleic Acids Res v.22 CLUSTALW: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice Thompson J. D.;D. G. Higgins;T. J. Gibson https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673
  27. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. v.64 Association of marine archaea with the digestive tracts of two marine fish species van der Maarel;M. J. E. C.;R. R. E. Artz;R. Haanstra;L. J. Forney
  28. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. v.21 Determination of microbial diversity in environmental samples: Pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis Wintzingerode F. V.;U. B. Gobel;E. Stackebrandt https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.1997.tb00351.x