Community Participatory Small Park Design

주민 참여를 통한 도시 소공원 설계 및 조성

  • 김연금 (서울시립대학교 대학원 조경학과) ;
  • 성종상 (서울대학교 환경대학원 환경조경학과) ;
  • 조석만 (서울시립대학교 대학원 조경학과) ;
  • 이규목 (서울시립대학교 도시과학대 건축도시조경학부)
  • Published : 2003.04.01

Abstract

This paper presents a community participatory small-park design. It proposes that environmental planning and design can be understood as a communicative action that aims to achieve consensus among stakeholders through communication with the local residents. By studying the communicative action theory and communicative planning theory, three strategies were set for practicing small-park design as a communicative action: (1) stakeholders should how what data and actions are needed; (2) citizens should have access to the data and participate in the process; (3) the community's concerns should be consulted and their opinions heard. In applying the three strategies to the small-Park design, a council composed of experts, community members, and NGO's was established. All processes were then executed after careful deliberation. From interviews, the town-touring program and surveys, the design of the site was determined among the stakeholders. The site was subsequently designed based on the needs of the community and revised according to their suggestions. Finally, the small park was constructed. Even though the researchers experienced many limitations because the site is very small, the significance of this study can be outlined as follows: (1) the need to construct the park was suggested by the community rather than by the administration; (2) experts, members of the community, and NGO's constituted the council; (3) the design process involved deliberation among the members of council rather than a method previously established by experts; (4) the administration supported rather than led the entire process: (5) citizens discussed and reached a consensus by themselves.

Keywords

References

  1. 걷고 싶은 도시만들기 시민연대(2002) 마을만들기 2000+2-마을만들기의 지속 가능성. 도시연대 보고서
  2. 김억중 외 공역(2000) 일상의 건축. N. J. Harbraken The Structure of Ordnary. 서울 : 기문당
  3. 김영민(1997) 탈식민성과 우리 인문학의 글쓰기. 서울 : 민음사
  4. 김찬호(2002) 도시는 미디어다. 서울 : 책세상
  5. 대한국토도시계획학회(2000) 도시계획론. 서울 : 보성각
  6. 박정욱(2000) 우리시대의 설계언어 : 프랑스(15) -피에르 도나디유. 경관의 창조적인 보전을 위하여. 환경과 조경 통권제 151호 pp. 55-65
  7. 박현찬. 유나경(2001) 걷고 싶은 거리 만들기 시범가로 시행평가 및 향후 추진방향 연구. 서울시정개발연구원 보고서
  8. 전경갑(1999) 현대와 탈현대의 사회사상. 서울 한길사
  9. Forester. John(1988) Chtical Theory and Panning Practice. In John Forester eds., Critical Theory and Public Life,Massachusetts: The MIT Press. pp. 203-227
  10. 서규환 외 공역(1995) 소통행위 이론 1. Habermas, JiirgenTheorie des Kommunikatrven Handelns. 서울 : 의암출판
  11. 소진광(2002) 지방자치와 지역발전의 연계. 서울대학교 환경대학원 2002년 21세기 국가발전과 국토 환경에 대한 세미나자료집. pp. 29-47
  12. Innes, Judith(1998) Knowledge and Pubhc Pohcy. Journal ofthe Amencan Plannmg Association 64(1). pp. 52-63 https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369808975956
  13. Sager. Tore(1994) Communicative Ranning theory. Brook field USA : Avebury
  14. Sanoff. Henry(2000) Community participation methods in design and planning. New York : John Wiley&Sons, Inc.
  15. Thompson, lan H.(1999) Ecology. community and delight sources of values in landscape architecture. London : E &FN Spon.