DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Shortcomings of Mechanical Model with Lumped Mass for Dynamic Characterization of Hydraulic Mounts and Confirmation of Hydraulic Model by Improvement of Experimentations

유체 봉입 마운트의 동적 특성화를 위한 집중질량 요소를 갖는 기계적 모형의 문제점 파악과 실험 방법 개선을 통한 수력학적 모형의 타당성 확인

  • 배만석 (한국과학기술원 기계공학과) ;
  • 이준화 (한국과학기술원 기계공학과) ;
  • 김광준 (한국과학기술원 기계공학과)
  • Published : 2003.05.01

Abstract

Hydraulic mounts show strong1y frequency-dependent stiffness and damping characteristics in low frequency range, which result from so called inertia track dynamics. A lumped mass has been incorporated in several mechanical models of the literature to take the inertia effect of the fluid in the track into consideration. Although complex s%illness by the mechanical model showed good agreements with the measured values, there exists a critical pitfall. In this paper, the shortcomings of mechanical models with lumped mass for hydraulic founts are clearly identified by illustrating actual measurements of the stiffness parameters for a hydraulic mount. It is conclusively discussed that the inertia effect of the fluid flow through the circular track is significant but latent. As an alternative to the mechanical model, a hydraulic model is claimed to be used for further dynamic analysis of engine/mount system or whole car system.

Keywords

References

  1. Yu, Y., Naganathan. N. G. and Dukkipati, R. V., 2001. "A Literature Review of Automotive Vehicle Engine Msystems," Mechanism and Machine Theory. 36. pp. 123-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-114X(00)00023-9
  2. Brach. R. M. and Haddow. A. G., "On the Dynamic Response of Hydraulic Engine Mounts." SAE Paper 931321.
  3. Kim. G. and Singh. R., 1995, "A Study of Passive and Adaptive Hydraulic Engine Mount Systems with Emphasis on Non-linear Characteristics," Journal of Sound and Vibration. Vol. 179. No. 3. pp. 427-453. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1995.0028
  4. Bernuchon. M., "A New Generation of Engine Mounts." SAE Technical Paper Series 840259.
  5. Flower. W. C., "Understanding Hydraulic Mounts for Improved Vehicle Noise, Vibration and Ride Qualities," SAE Technical Pper Series 850975.
  6. Ushijima. T., Takano. K. and Kojima, H., "High Performance Hydraulic Mount for Improving Vehicle Noise and Vibration." SAE Technical Paper Series 880073.
  7. Singh, R., Kim. G. and Ravindra. P. V., 1992, "Linear Analysis of Automotive Hydro-mechanical Mount with Emphasis on Decoupler Characteristics," Journal of Sound and Vibration. Vol. 158, No. 2, pp. 219-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(92)90047-2
  8. Colgate, J. E., Chang, C.-T., Chiou, Y.-C., Liu, W. K. and Keer, L. M., 1995. "Modelling of a Hydraulic Engine Mount Focusing on Response to Sinusoidal and Composite Excitations." Journal of Sound and Vibration. Vol. 184. No. 3. pp. 503-528. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1995.0330
  9. 안영공, 송진대, 양보석, 김동조, 2002, “인공생명 알고리듬을 이용한 유체마운트의 최적설계,” 한국소음공학회논문집, 제 12권 제 8호, 598-608. https://doi.org/10.5050/KSNVN.2002.12.8.598
  10. Geisberger, A., Khajepour, A. and Golnaraghi, F., 2002, "Non-linear Modeling of Hydraulic Mounts : Theory and Experiment." Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 249. No. 2, pp. 371-397. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2001.3860
  11. 김철순, 1989, “유체 봉입 마운트의 동특성 해석,” 한국과학기술원, 기계공학과, 석사학위논문.
  12. 이준화, 김광준, 원광민, 강구태, 2001, “유체봉입 마운트 선형 모형의 해석적 구성 기법,” 대한기계학회 춘계학술대회논문집(B), pp. 410-415.
  13. Kim G. and Singh. R., 1993. "Nonlinear Analysis of Automotive Hydraulic Engine Mount." Journal of Dynamic Systems. Measurement. and Control. Transactions of the ASME. 115, pp. 482-487. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2899126