System Identification and Stability Evaluation of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle From Automated Flight Tests

  • Jinyoung Suk (Department of Aerospace Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Younsaeng (UAV Programs, Changwon Plant, Korea Aerospace Industries, Ltd.) ;
  • Kim, Seungjoo (UAV Programs, Changwon Plant, Korea Aerospace Industries, Ltd.) ;
  • Hueonjoon Koo (UAV Team, 3rd System Development Center, Agency for Defense Development) ;
  • Kim, Jongseong (UAV Team, 3rd System Development Center, Agency for Defense Development)
  • Published : 2003.05.01

Abstract

This paper presents a consequence of the systematic approach to identify the aerodynamic parameters of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) equipped with the automatic flight control system. A 3-2-1-1 excitation is applied for the longitudinal mode while a multi-step input is applied for lateral/directional excitation. Optimal time step for excitation is sought to provide the broad input bandwidth. A fully automated programmed flight test method provides high-quality flight data for system identification using the flight control computer with longitudinal and lateral/directional autopilots, which enable the separation of each motion during the flight test. The accuracy of the longitudinal system identification is improved by an additional use of the closed-loop flight test data. A constrained optimization scheme is applied to estimate the aerodynamic coefficients that best describe the time response of the vehicle. An appropriate weighting function is introduced to balance the flight modes. As a result, concurrent system models are obtained for a wide envelope of both longitudinal and lateral/directional flight maneuvers while maintaining the physical meanings of each parameter.

Keywords

References

  1. Gelb, A., 1974, Applied Optimal Estimation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
  2. Hamel, P. and Jategaonkar, R., 1996, 'Evolution of Flight Vehicle System Identification,' Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 33. No.1, pp. 9-28 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46898
  3. Hoak, D., 1972 USAF Stability and Control DATCOM, Flight Control Division, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Wright-Peterson Air Force Base, Ohio
  4. Iliff, K. and Maine, R., 1984, More Than You May Want To Know About Maximum Likelihood Estimation, NASA-TM-85905
  5. Iliff, K., 1989, 'Parameter Estimation for Flight Vehicles,' Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 12. No.5, pp.609-622 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20454
  6. Jategaonkar, R. and Plaetschke, E., 1989, 'Algorithms for Aircraft Parameter Estimation Accounting for Process and Measurement Noise,' Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 26, No.4, pp. 360-372 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45769
  7. Kim, H., Kim, Y. and Lee, S., 1997, 'Identification Technique of Linear System Using Time Responses and Eigen Information,' Proceedings of AIAA/ ASME/ AHS Adaptive Structures Forum, Kissimmee, Florida, USA, April
  8. Kim, I., Lee, Y. and Suk, J., 2001, 'Development of ADAS and Its Verification through Flight Tests,' Journal of the Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Vol. 29, No.4, pp. 123-128
  9. Klein, V., 1989, 'Estimation of Aircraft Aerodynamic Parameters From Flight Data,' Progress in Aerospace Science, Vol. 26, pp. 1-77 https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-0421(89)90002-X
  10. Kuo, C., Schoen, M., Chinvorat, S. and Huang, J., 2000, 'Closed-Loop System Identification by Residual Whitening,' Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 23, No.3, pp. 406-411 https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4574
  11. Lee, H. and Lee, S., 1998, 'Parameter Estimation of a Single Turbo-Prop Aircraft Dynamic Model,' Journal of Control, Automation and Systems Engineering, Vol. 4, No.1, pp. 38-44
  12. Lee, Y., Suk, J. and Kim, T., 2001, 'Stability Flight Test Methods for an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle,' Proceedings of 2001 Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences Annual Conference, Kyongsang National University, Chinju, Korea, Apr. pp. 371 - 376
  13. Maine, R. and Murray, J., 1988, 'Application of Parameter Estimation to Highly Unstable Aircraft,' Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 11, No.3, pp. 213-219 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20296
  14. Morelli, E. and Klein, V., 1990, 'Optimal Input Design for Aircraft Parameter Estimation Using Dynamic Programming Principles', AIAA 902801 CP
  15. Morelli, E., 1996, 'Parameter Identification Flight Test Maneuvers for Closed Loop Modeling of the F-18 High Alpha Research Vehicle (HARV),' NASA-CR-198269
  16. Morelli, E., 1997, 'Flight Test Validation of Optimal Input Design and Comparison to Conventional Inputs,' Proceedings of AIAA Flight Mechanics Conterence, New Orleans, Liouisiana, Aug. 11-13
  17. Morelli, E., 2000, 'Real-Time Parameter Estimation in the Frequency Domain,' Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 23, No.5, pp.812-818 https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4642
  18. Shafer, M., 1984, Flight Investigation of Various Control Inputs Intended for Parameter Estimation, NASA-TM-85901
  19. Song, C, Jeon, I., Lee, S. and Kwon, S., 1995, 'Estimation of the Aerodynamic Parameters for a Flight Vehicle From Flight Test,' AIAA-953497-CP
  20. Song, Y. and Hwang, M., 1998, 'A Study on the Aircraft Parameter Estimation from Flight Test Data,' Journal of The Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Vol. 26, No.6, pp.1-12
  21. Song, Y., Song, B., Seanor, B. and Napolitano, M., 2002, 'On-Line Aircraft Parameter Identification Using Fourier Transform Regression With an Application to NASA F / A -18- HARV Flight Data,' KSME International Journal, Vol. 16, No.3, pp. 327-337
  22. Speyer, J. and Crues, E., 1987, 'On-Line Aircraft State and Stability Derivative Estimation Using the Modified-Gain Extended Kalman Filter,' Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 10, No.3, pp. 262-268 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20212