EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS IN ULTRA LOW SULFUR DIESEL

  • Oh, S.-K. (Graduate School of Automotive Engineering, Kookmin University) ;
  • Baik, D.-S. (Graduate School of Automotive Engineering, Kookmin University) ;
  • Han, Y.C. (Graduate School of Automotive Engineering, Kookmin University)
  • Published : 2003.06.01

Abstract

Automobile industry has been developed rapidly as a key manufacturing industry in Korea. Meanwhile, air pollution is getting worse noticeably than ever. In the diesel emission, PM (Particulate Matter) and NOx (Nitrogen Oxides) have been exhausted with a great amount and the corresponding emission regulations are getting stringent. In order to develop low emission engines, it is necessary to research on better qualified fuels. Sulfur contained in fuel is transformed to sulfur compound by DOC (Diesel Oxidation Catalyst) and then it causes to the increase of sulfate-laden PM on the surface of catalyst. In this research, ULSD (Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel) is used as a fuel and some experimental results are investigated. ULSD can reduce not only PM but also gas materials because cetane value, flash point, distillation 90%, pour point and viscosity are improved in the process of desulfurization. However, excessively reduced sulfur may cause to decease lubricity of fuel and engine performance in fuel injection system. Therefore, it requires only modest adjusted amount of sulfur can improve engine performance and DOC, as well as decrease of emission.

Keywords

References

  1. Arai, M. (1992). Impact of changes in fuel properties and lubrication oil paniculate emission and SOF, SAEPaper No. 920556
  2. Batt, R. J., Mcmillan, J. A. and Bradbury, I. P. (1996).Lubricity additives- performance and NO effects in low sulfur fuels', SAE Paper No. 961943
  3. Clark, W. and Sverdrup, G. M. (2000). Overview ofdiesel emission control-sulfur effects program, SAE Paper No. 2000-01-1879
  4. Daniels, T. L. and Carlson, P. N. (1996). The effect of diesel sulfur content and oxidation catalysts ontransient emissions, SAE Paper No. 961974
  5. Han, Y. C. and Kim, D. J. (2000). New Edition Internal Combustion Engine, Moonwoon Publishing, 179-203.Seoul, Korea
  6. John, J. C. and Andrew, J. Y. (1995). Three dimensional computer modeling of the internal flow within a swirl atomizer, ILASS-Europe, 191. England
  7. Jung, Y. I. (1998). Automotive and Environment,Hansung Univ. Publishing, 16-23. Seoul, Korea
  8. Kim, J. H., Lee, B. S. and Koo, J. Y. (1999). The effect of ambient gas density on the development of impinging diesel spray, ILASS- KOREA 4, 2, 40. Seoul, Korea
  9. Martiy, A. Barris, (1992). Development of diesel exhaust catalystic converter mufflers, SAE Paper No. 920369
  10. Michael, G. Campbell and Edward P. Martin, (1995).Substrate selection for a diesel catalyst, SAE Paper No.950372
  11. Port, B. (1991). Engine and catalyst strategies for 1994,SAE Paper No. 910604
  12. Schroder, O., Krahl, J. and Munack, A. (1999).Environmental and health effects caused by the use ofbiodiesel, SAE Paper No. 1999-01-3561
  13. Stephen, R. Tums, (1999). An Introduction to Combustion, Concepts and Applications, McGraw-Hill, 240.New York
  14. Stephen, R. Tums, (1999). An Introduction to Combustion, Concepts and Applications, McGraw-Hill, 337.New York
  15. Yoon, S. J. and Cho, D. J. (1999). The effect of viscosityon the spray characteristics of pressure swirl atomizer, ILASS-KOREA 4, 4, 24. Seoul, Korea