Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science (한국초지조사료학회지)

The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science (한국초지조사료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study on the Herbage Utilization from Tall type and Tall+short type Mixtures by Korean Native Goats

상번초 및 상ㆍ하번초형 혼파초지의 산양에 의한 초류이용성 비교 연구

  • Published : 2003.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of tall type mixtures(TM) and tall + short type mixtures(TSM) on nutritive utilization. DM intake, digestibility and utilization of nitrogen and energy of herbages from pastures by Korean native goats were determined. This experiment was conducted by total collection method in laboratory, 2000. The experimental herbage included two treatments: Tall type mixtures(orchardgrass, Potomac 40+tall fescue, Fawn 20+Festulolium braunii, Paulita 10+perennial ryegrass. Reveille 10+timothy, Climax 10+red clover, Kenblue 5+alfalfa, Vernal 5%), Tall+short type mixtures {orchardgrass, Potomac 40+tall fescue, Fawn 20+Kentucky bluegrass, New port(turf type) 10+redtop, Barricuda(turf type) 10+perennial ryegrass, Palmer III(turf type) 10+red fescue, Flyer II(turf type) 5+white clover, Regal 5%}. The voluntary dry matter(DM) intake of Korean native goats fed with herbages from tall+short type mixtures(TSM) was slightly higher than that of tall type mixtures(TM), but no difference was observed between TSM and TM(p > 0.05). The digestibility of DM, neutral detergent fiber, cellular contents and acid detergent fiber of herbage from TSM was slightly higher than that of TM, but no difference was detected between TSM and TM(p > 0.05). The utilization of nitrogen and energy by Korean native goats did not showed any difference in herbages from TSM and TM(p > 0.05). In conclusion, the herbage utilization by Korean native goats did not showed any significant difference. Thus, there is a possibility that turf grasses in mixtures can be used as a forage sources.

본 시험은 2000년 4월부터 8월까지 충남대학교 생명과학대학내 부속 실험축사에서 수행하였다. 시험에 공시된 목초는 1999년에 경운초지 조성방법으로 조성된 상번초형 혼파초지(tall type mixtures, 파종비율: orchardgrass, Potomac 40+ tall fescue, Fawn 20+ Festulolium braunii, Paulita 10 + perennial ryegrass, Reveille 10+timothy Climax 10+red clover, Kenblue 5+alfalfa, Vernal 5%)와 상ㆍ하번초형 혼파초지{tall+short type mixtures, 파종비율: orchardgrass, Potomac 40+tall fescue, Fawn 20+Kentucky bluegrass, New port(turf type) 10+ redtop, Barricuda(turf type) 10+perennial ryegrass, Palmer III (turf type) 10+red fescue, Flyer II(turf type) 5+white clover, Regal 5%}에서 수확된 1번초(2000년 4월 22일)로 한국재래산양을 이용하여 초지 혼파유형에 따른 목초의 이용성을 비교분석하기 위하여 시험을 실시하였고 얻어진 결과는 다음과 같다. 1) 1일 체중 kg당 건물섭취량은 상ㆍ하번초형 혼파초지가 28.6g으로 상번초형 혼파초지의 27.9g에 비하여 다소 높았으나 유의적인 차이는 없었다. 건물, cellular constituent, NDF 및 ADF 소화을은 상ㆍ하번초형 혼파초지가 상번 초형 혼파초지에 비하여 역시 높은 편이었으나 유의적인 차이는 나타나지 않았다. 2) 체내에 축적된 질소율(외관상의 생물가)은 상ㆍ하번초형 혼과초지가 54.5%으로 상번초형 혼파초지의 53.7%보다 높았으나 유의적인 차이는 인정되지 않았다. 3) 외관상 대사에너지의 축적률은 상ㆍ하번 초형 혼파초지가 59.4%으로 상번초형 혼파초지의 58.2%보다 약간 높은 편이었으나 유의적인 차이는 인정되지 않았다. 따라서, 산양에 의한 목초의 이용성은 두 혼파 초지간에 큰 차이가 없는 것으로 나타나, 혼파초지내 turf type 초류도 사초자원으로써 이용가치가 있다고 하겠다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, B.H. and W.N. Garrett. 1988. Influence of stage of maturity on feeding values of alfalfa, II.EfFect of stage of maturity on digestibility and ME value of alfalfa hay and body composition of beef caale fed alfalfa hay cube. Kor. J. Anim. Feed. 12:34-39
  2. A.O.A.C. 1990. Official methods of ana1ysis(15th ed.) Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC
  3. Brian, L.D. and P.J. Umess. 1991. Nutritional value of fresh Gamble oak browse for Spanish goats. J. Range Managt. 44:361-364 https://doi.org/10.2307/4002399
  4. Crampton, F.W. and L.A. Maynard. 1938. The relation of cellulose and lignin content to the nutritive value of animal feeds. J. Nut. 15:383-395 https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/15.4.383
  5. Dulphy, J.P. 1979. The intake of conserved forage. Forage conservation in the 80'S. occasional Symposium No. 11. British Grassland Soci. p. 107-121
  6. Frame, J. and R-D. Harkess. 1987. The productivity of farm forage legumes sown alone and with each of five companion grasses. Grass and Forage Sci 42:213-22 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1987.tb02109.x
  7. Givens. D.L, A.R. Moss and A.H. Adamson. 1993 Influence of growth stage and season on the ener-gy value of fresh herbage, I . Changes in metab-olizable energy content. Grass and Forage Sci. 48 166-174 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1993.tb01849.x
  8. Goring, H.K.'and P.J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agr. Handbook. No. 379. ARS. USDA Washington. D.C
  9. Greenhalgh, J.F.D. and F.W. Wainman. 1979. The utilization of energy in conserved forages. Forage conservation in the 80's. Occasional sympossium. No. 11. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 121-129
  10. Hodgson, J., J.M. Rodriguez Capriles. and J.S Fenlon. 1977. The influence of herbage Characteristics on the herbage intake of grazing calves. J Agri. Sci. Cambridge. 89:743-750 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600061542
  11. Jarrige, R., G. Demarquilly and J.P. Dulphy. 1974 The voluntary intake of forage, Proceedings of the fifth general meeting European Grassland Federation. Upsala. Plant husbandry. 28:98-106
  12. Osoro, K. and M. Cebrian. 1989. Digestibility of energy and gross energy intake in fresh pasture. Grass and forage Sci. 44:41-46 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1989.tb01908.x
  13. Peel, S. and J.O. Green. 1984. Sward composition and output on grassland farms. Grass and Forage Sci. 39:107-110 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1984.tb01671.x
  14. 김내수, 김정우, 박홍양 상병찬. 여정수, 전광주, 최광수. 홍기창. 1995. 응용통계학. 유한문화사. 서울
  15. 이인덕. 1988. 면양에 의한 야초지와 개량초지의 초류이용성 비교. 한초지. 8(3):147-151
  16. 이인덕, 이형석. 1993. 혼파유형이 목초의 수량과 품질에 미치는 영향. 한초지. 13(1):38-42
  17. 이형석. 이인덕. 1995. 산양에 의한 초지유형별 목초의 섭취량 및 영양가치 이용성 비교. 한초지. 15(4):297-302