A study on the quality management status and performance recognition of enterprises

기업의 품질경영 실태와 성과인식에 관한 연구

  • 이만표 (한국표준협회 품질경영연구개발팀장, 인하대학교 교육대학원)
  • Published : 2003.09.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify (1) the successful quality management activities of domestic enterprises contribute to enhancing both corporate and national competitiveness and that the corporate and national competitiveness are related each other; (2) and to have the government and the citizens as well as enterprises re-recognize the importance of quality management and encourage them to make aggressive investments on quality management. It was found in this study that the enterprises with quality management scheme showed better performance that those without quality management activities. It was also found that quality competitiveness is a key factor for the enhancement of the national competitiveness, and that although quality improvement is normally realized through efforts of private enterprises (a conventional paradigm), active government support and participation are absolutely necessary for the competitiveness of the nation and industries. Accordingly, the quality management should be recognized not only as part of business improvement activities, but as nationwide activities where public sectors including government enterprises, hospitals, schools, regional governments, media companies and citizens groups are involved. In order to build a high-quality nation in the 21st century, the quality improvement should be realized through concerted efforts of the people, enterprises and the government.

Keywords

References

  1. 다카스키 노부야(高杉暢也), 동아일보2003년 7월 4일
  2. 산업발전전략기획단(2002), 「2010 산업비전 산업4강으로의 길」 , 한국경제신문
  3. 안영진(2002), 「경영품질론: 6시그마와TQM」, 박영사
  4. 안영진(2003), '품질과 경쟁력', 「품질경영」 , 2003년 7월호, p.24
  5. 조중완(2001), 「신품질경영」, 한국표준협회
  6. 한국표준협회(2003), '한국형 경영품질 최적모델개발', 「경영품질혁신을 위한 기반구축 사업에 관한 보고서, 2차년도 중간보고서
  7. Akers, J. F.(1991), 'World-Class Quality:Nothing Less Will Do,' QuatityProgress, October, pp.26-27
  8. Aune, A.(1990), 'Total Management toUniversities: A Challenge and aNecessity', ASQC Annual Conference,San Francisco, May
  9. Barrie Dale & Cary Cooper(2002), TotalQuatity and Human Resource: AnExecutive Guide, Blackwell Published,Oxford
  10. Buzzel, Rovert D. & Gale, BradleyT.(1987), The PIMS Principles, NewYork: Free Press
  11. Cottrell, J.(1992), 'Favorable Recipe',TQM Magagine, February, pp.17-20
  12. Ferdows, K. & De Meyer(1990), 'LastingImprovement in ManufacturingPerformance: In Search of a NewTheory', Journal of Operations Management, Winter, pp.168-184
  13. Fisher, T. J.(1992), 'The Impact ofQuality Management on Productivity',International JoumaI of Quatity and ReIiabiUty Management, Vol.9, No.3,p.44
  14. Juran, Joseph M.(1994), 'The UpcomingCentury of Quality', QuaIity Progress,August, pp.29-37
  15. Rastogi, A. K. & Sahni, A.(1995),'Total Quality Through Leadership',In Proceedings of the ASQC AnnualQuality Congress, Cincinati
  16. Yavas, B. F. & Burrows, T. M.(1994),'A Comparative Study of Attitude ofU.S. and Asian Managers Toward Product Quality', Quality Management Journal, Vol.2, No.1, pp.41-56