Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF UNIVERSAL COMPOSITES AFTER POLISHING PROCEDURES

전.구치 겸용 혼합형 복합레진의 두 가지 연마법에 따른 표면조도

  • Lee, Jae-Yong (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Shin, Dong-Hoon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 이재용 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 신동훈 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Published : 2003.09.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of two polishing methods and chemical conditioning on the surface of hybrid composites. Ninety cylindrical specimens (diameter：8mm, depth：2mm) were made with three hybrid composites-Filtek Z250, Tetric Ceram. DenFil. Specimens for each composite were randomly divided into three treatment subgroups $^{\circled1}$ Mylar strip (no treatment). $^{\circled2}$ Sof-Lex XT system, $^{\circled3}$ PoGo system. Average surface roughness(Ra) was taken using a surface profilometer at the time of setting and after immersion into 0.02N lactic acid for 1 week and 1 month. Representative specimens were examined by scanning electron microscopy. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and Scheffe's tests at 0.05% significance level. The results were as follows：1. Mylar strip resulted in smoother surface than PoGo and Sof-Lex system (p<0.001). Sof-Lex system gave the worst results. 2. Tetric Ceram was smoother than DenFil and Z250 when cured under only mylar strip. However, it was significantly rougher than other materials when polished with PoGo system. 3. All materials showed rough surface after storage in 0.02N lactic acid, except groups polished with a PoGo system. The PoGo system gave a superior polish than Sof-Lex system for the three composites. However. the correlation to clinical practice may be limited, since there are several processes. such as abrasive, fatigue, and corrosive mechanisms. Thus. further studies are needed for polishing technique under in vivo conditions.

Keywords

References

  1. Marigo L, Rizzi M, La Torre G and Rumi G : 3 D surface profile analysis: different finishing methods for resin composites. Oper Dent 26:562-568,2001
  2. Strassler HE and Baum G : Current concepts in polishing composite resins. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 5 (3 Suppl 1): 12-17, 1993
  3. Yab AU, Lye KW and Sau CW : Surface characteristics of tooth colored restoration polished utilizing different polishing system. Oper Dent 22(6) :260-265, 1997
  4. Toledano M, De La Torre FJ and Osorio R : Evaluation of two polishing methods for resin composites. Am J Dent 7:328-330, 1994
  5. von Noort R and Davis LG : The surface finish of composite resin restorative materials. Br Dent J 157(10): 360-364, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4805494
  6. Weitman RT and Eames WB : Plaque accumulation on composite surfaces after various finishing procedures. Oral Health 65 (12): 29-33, 1975
  7. Bollen CM, Lambrechta P and Quirynen M : Comparisen of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent MatBr 13(4) :258-269, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80038-3
  8. Joniot SB, Gregoire GL, Auther AM and Eoques YM : Three dimensional optical profilometrv analysis of surface states obtained after finishing sequences for three composite resins. Oper Dent 25(4) :311-315, 2000
  9. Bouvier D, Duprez JP and Lissac M Comparative evaluation of polishing systems on the surface of three aesthetic materials. J Oms Rehabii 24(12):888-894, 1997
  10. Roeder LB, Tate WH and Powers JM : Effect of finish ing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites. Oper Dent 25(6) :534-543, 2000
  11. Kaplan BA, Goldstein GR, Vijayaraghavan TV and Nelson IK : The effect of three polishing systems on the surface roughness of four hybrid composites: a profilometric and scanning electron microscopy study. J Prosthet Dent 76 (1):34-38, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90343-1
  12. Turssi CP, Saad JR, Duarte SL Jr and Rodrigues AL Jr : Composite surfaces after finishing and polishing techniques. Am J Dent 13(3):136-138, 2000
  13. Lutz F, Setcos JC and Phillips RW New finishing instruments for composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 107(4) :575-580, 1983 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1983.0300
  14. Stoddard JW and Johnson GH : An evaluation of polishing agents for composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 65(4):491-495, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90286-6
  15. Chung KH : Effects of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface texture of resin composites. Dent Mater 10(5):325-330, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90041-8
  16. van Dijken JW and Ruyter IE : Surface characteristics of posterior composites after polishing and toothbrushing. Acta Odontol Scand 45 (5):337-346, 1987 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358709096356
  17. Jung M : Finishing and polishing of a hybrid composite and a heat pressed glass ceramic. Oper Dent 27(2): 175-183, 2002
  18. Fruits TJ, Miranda FJ and Coury TL : Effects of equivalent abrasive grit sizes utilizing differing polishing motions on selected restorative materials. Quint essence Int 27(4): 279-285, 1996
  19. Albers HF Tooth colored restoratives 8th. Alto Books, 1996
  20. Yab AU, Lye KW and Sau CW : Effect of finishing/polishing time on surface characteristics of tooth coloured restoratives. J Oral Rehabil 25(6) :456-461, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00253.x
  21. Wu Wand McKinney JE : Influence of chemicals on wear of dental composites. J Dent Res 61(10):1180-1183, 1982
  22. Roulet JF and Walti C : Influence of oral fluid on composite resin and glass ionomer cement. J Prosthet Dent 52(2) :182-189, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(84)90092-1
  23. Setcos JC, Tarim B and Suzuki S : Surface finish produce d on resin composites by new systems. Quintessence Int 30 (3):169-173, 1999
  24. Yap AU, Low JS and Ong LF : Effect of food simulating liquids on surface characteristics of composite and polyacid modified composite restoratives. Oper Dent 25(3) :170-176, 2000
  25. Jefferies SR, Barkmeier WW and Gwinnett AJ : Three composite finishing systems: a multisite in vitro evaluation. J Esthet Dent 4(6): 181-185, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1992.tb00693.x
  26. Berastegui E, Canalda C, Brau E and Miquel C : Surface roughness of finished composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 68(5) :742-749, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90195-G
  27. Strassler HE and Bauman G : Current concepts in poliahing composite resins. Pracs Periodontics Aesthet Dent 5(3 Suppl 1): 12-17, 1993
  28. Ferracane JL, Condon JR and Mitchem JC : Evaluation of subsurface defects created during the finishing of composites. J Dent Res 71(9):1628-1632, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345920710091601
  29. Kao EC : Influence of food simulating solvents on resin composites and glass ionomer restorative cement. Dent Mater 5(3): 201-208, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(89)90014-6
  30. Soderholm KJ : Leaking of fillers in dental composites. J Dent Res 62(2):126- 130, 1983

Cited by

  1. Influence of the Surface roughness on translucency and surface color of the dental composite resins vol.31, pp.4, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.4.312
  2. Surface roughness of composite resin according to finishing methods vol.32, pp.2, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.2.138
  3. Evaluation on the abrasion resistance of a surface sealant vol.32, pp.3, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.3.180
  4. Surface roughness of experimental composite resins using confocal laser scanning microscope vol.33, pp.1, 2008, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.1.001
  5. The evaluation of surface roughness and polishing time between polishing systems vol.36, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.2.119