The Study on the Comparison of the ISCST3 Model and Receptor Model by Dispersion Tracing of Particulate Matter from Large Scale Pollution Sources

대단위배출원에서 기인한 입자상오염물질의 확산ㆍ추적을 통한 ISCST3모델과 수용모델의 비교연구

  • Published : 2003.12.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the usefulness between Gaussian dispersion model and receptor model with the experimental result of the dispersion tracing of the particulate pollutants from Taean coal-fired power plants. For this purpose, the component analysis of the collected PM 10 samples was performed. In order to trace the pollution sources, factor analysis was done with the result of the component analysis. As a result of the correlativity analysis of the fifteen power plants' profiles offered by US EPA, the correlativity of No.11202 source profile showed highest rate up to 84.5%. Thus it was adopted as proper one and the contribution rate by each pollution source was calculated by Chemical Mass Balance (CMB)-8 model. The contribution rate, which was the effect rate of the power plants on each measuring point, were calculated with a range of 24∼52% and the standard error was below 0.9 $\mu\textrm{g}$/㎥. This indicates the selection of the source profile was appropriate. Also, the concentrations of each point were calculated by the ISCST3 which is suggested by US EPA as one of the regulatory Gaussian dispersion model. The calculation result showed that the predicted concentration was 50∼58 $\mu\textrm{g}$/㎥, comparing with the measured result of 9∼65 $\mu\textrm{g}$/㎥. It was found that the concentration calculated by ISCST3 was underpredicted. It was thought that the receptor model was more favorable than the Gaussian dispersion model in estimating the effect of the particulate matter on a certain receptive point.

Keywords

References

  1. 김관수, 황인조, 김동술 (2001) 수원지역 대기 중 PM-10오 염원의 정량평가를 위한 수용방법론의 개발,한국 대기환경학회지,17(2), 119-131
  2. 김동술, 이태정(1993) 입경분류에 입각하여 목표변환인자분 석법을 이용한 수원지역 분진 오염원의 정량적 기여도 추정, 한국대기보전학회치, 9(1),44-50
  3. 서영화, 구자공(1992) 대기분진의 무기 화학적 조성 분석과 chemical mass balance에 의 한 오염원 기여도 산출, 한국대기보전학회지, 8(2), 112-120
  4. 신혜정, 검지영, 최병철, 오성남, Jianzhen Yu ,Keith Bower (2002) ACE-Asia 칩중관측기간에 측정한 대기오 염물철의 농도 분포특성, 한국대기환경학회지, 18(6),487-501
  5. 유정석, 김동술, 김윤신(1995) 서울시 PM- 10 오염원의 정 량적 기여도 추정 11(3),279-290
  6. 한국전력기술(주) (1996) '비산탄진 확산예측시스템 개발 기술개발 최종보고서'
  7. 한국전력기술(주) (1997) '방진 빛 방풍벽 기본설계 기술개 발 기술개발 최종보고서'
  8. 국립 환경 연구원 (2002) Long Range Transport of Toxic Trace Substances: Identification and impact analysis (1)
  9. Ahuja, M., J. Paskind, J.E. Houck, and J.e. Chow (1989) 'Design of study for the chemical and size characterization of particulate matter emissions from selected sources in California', Air and Waste Management Assosiation, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 145158
  10. Chow, J.C. and J.G. Watson (1998) Guideline on speciated particulate monitoring, Third Draft Report. Prepared for US EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC, Desert Research Institute Reno, NV. August
  11. Chow, J.C., C.S. Liuy, J. Cassmassi, J.G. Watson, Z. Lu, and L.C. Prichett (1992) A neighborhood -scale study of PM I0 source contributions in Rubidoux, California. Atmos. Environ. 26A, 693-706
  12. Ichikawa, Y. and K. Asakura(1986)碧南火力發電所豫定地鮎からの炭塵 飛散量橡測,エネルギ-硏究所
  13. Ichikawa, Y. and K. Asakura (1990) 'Development of an environmental assessment method for coal particle dispersion caused by coal- handling facilities', Komae Research Laboratory Rep. No. T89025
  14. Johann P. Engelbrecht, LeonSwanepoel, Judith e. Chow, John G. Waston, and Richard T. Egami (2002) The comparison of source contributions from residential coal and low-smoke fuels, using CMB modeling, in South Africa, Environmental Science & Policy 5,157-167
  15. Kim, B.M. and Ronald C. Henry (2000) Application of SAFER model to Los Angeles PM10 data, Atmospheric Environment, 34, 1747-1759
  16. US EPA (1998) AP-42 Compilation Factor Fifth edition, Vol. 1, Chap. 1, External Combustion source
  17. US EPA (1990) EPA-450/4-90-004, 'Receptor model technology series, volume III
  18. US EPA (2002) 40 CFR Ch. 1 Part 41, App. W to Part 51, 'Guideline on Air Quality Models'
  19. Waston, J.G., N.F. Robinson, and J.C. Chow (1990) The USEPA/DRI Chemical Mass Balance Receptor Model, CMB 7.0, Environmental Software, 5(1), 38-49 https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-9838(90)90015-X