Spatial Distribution of Rice Root under Long-term Chemical and Manure Fertilization in Paddy

화학비료 및 희비 장기시용에 따른 벼 뿌리 분포 특성

  • Published : 2003.12.01

Abstract

It is well known that root distribution of rice is a crucial factor for nutrient absorbtion and affect by soil fertility management. However, the findings on root distribution are limited due to laborious and tedious work. The characteristics of root distribution were investigated in long-term fertilizer experiment plots that were established in paddy soil, a fine silty family of typic Hal-paqueps (Pyeongtaeg series) in 1967. fertilizer experiment plots of no fertilizer, compost, NPK and NPK+compost plot have been maintained consistently for the past thirty six year and Npk+silicate plot for the past twenty two years. In NPK plot, 150kg N (urea), 100kg -$\textrm{P}_2\textrm{O}_5$ (fused phosphate) and 100kg $\textrm{K}_2\textrm{O}$(potassium chloride) per hectare have been applied. For NPK+silicate plot, 500kg $\textrm{Si}\textrm{O}_2$ (silicate) was applied in addition to fertilizer in NPK plot. For the compost plot, 10,000kg rice straw compost per hectare were applied. Root samples were taken from the positions of hill-center (below hill) and mid-point of four adjacent rice hills at heading stage by cylinder monolith (CM) method. The soil cores were sampled 20cm depth from the soil surface and partitioned four into layers at an interval of 5cm. The soil particles surrounding roots were washed out with tap water, Length and weight of the roots in each soil layer were measured and root length density (RLD), root weight density (RWD), specific root length(SRL) and rooting depth index (RDI) were calculated. Total root length was measured by intersection method. Plant height, tiller and shoot dry weight were the highest in NPK+compost plot. But RLD of hill-center soil cores was the highest in no-fertilizer plots. In the soil cores from mid-point position of four adjacent hills, RLD at 15-20cm soil depth was higher in compost plot than NPK plot. RLD in compost plots showed even distribution compared to those in chemical- fertilizer plots. RWD was the highest in the NPK+compost plot. SRL was the lowest in the NPK+silicate plot. RDI was the highest in the compost plot. Also, in this experiment it was found that the distribution of roots was closely related to the physical properties of the soil as affected by fertilization management.

무기질 비료 및 퇴비를 36년간 장기 시용한 논 토양에서 벼 뿌리의 분포양상을 구명하기 위하여 무비, 퇴비단용, 삼요소, 삼요소+퇴비, 삼요소+규산구의 벼 뿌리 관련 특성을 조사하였다. 본 시험은 평택통에 화삼벼를 주당 3본씩 손이앙 하였으며 삼요소구의 시비량은 N-$\textrm{P}_2\textrm{O}_5$-$\textrm{K}_2\textrm{O}$ kg $\textrm{ha}^{-1}$=150-100-100를 시용하였고 규산은 ha당 500kg, 퇴비는 ha당 10,000kg를 시용하였다. 근계특성 분포 특성을 요약하면 다음과 같다. 지상부의 건물중은 시비량이 많을수록 높은 경향이었다 그러나 뿌리 건물중은 삼요소구에 비하여 삼요소+퇴비에서 많았으며, 총근장은 무비에서 컸다. 뿌리 건물중은 삼요소+퇴비구에서 높았다 토심별 근장밀도(cm $\textrm{cm}^{-3}$)는 무비구의 주간하 0-5cm에서 가장 높았고 토심이 깊어질수록 적어지는 경향이었고 주하와 주간하의 차이는 심토로 갈수록 적어지는 경향이었으나 퇴비단용구는 토심 15-20cm의 주간하에서 주하와 차이가 컸다. 토심별 근중밀도(mg $\textrm{cm}^{-3}$)는 삼요소+회비구에서 가장 높았다. 비근장은 삼요소+규산구에서 가장 낮았다. 뿌리깊이 지수는 퇴비단용구가 높았으며 근장으로 계산한 지수가 근중으로 계산한 지수보다 높았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Barley, K. P. 1970. The configuration of the root system in relation to nutrient uptake. Adv. Agron. 17 : 159-201
  2. Bohm W. 1979. Methods of studying root systems. Ecological Studies33. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York
  3. Cheema, S. S., U Chaudhri, and M. R. Chaudhary. 1979. Rooting pattern of three rice varieties. Crop improvement 6 : 58-62
  4. Eissenstat D. M. 1992. Costs and benefits of constructing roots of small diameter. J. PIant Nutr. 15 : 763-782 https://doi.org/10.1080/01904169209364361
  5. Kang Si Yong, Bo Kyeong Kim, and Shigenori Morita. 2001. Leaf-stem cutting as a rapid method for characterizing rooting habit of rice cultivars. Korean J. Breed. 33(3): 175-180
  6. Kang, S. Y., S. Morita, and K. Yamazaki. 1994. Root growth and distribution in some japonica-indica hybrid and japonica rice cultivarsunder field conditions. Korean JournaI of Crop Science 63(1) :118~124
  7. Klute, A. 1986. Methods of soil analysis ' part II. physical and mineralogical methods Amer. Soc. Agron. Inc. Madison USA pp 1188
  8. Lafitte, H. R., M. C. Champoux, G. McLaren and J. C. O'Toole. 2001.Rice root morphological traits are related to isozyme group andadaptation. Field Crops Research 71:57-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00150-2
  9. Marsh, B.a'B. 1971. Measurement of length in random arrangementsof lines. J. Appl Ecol. 8:265-267 https://doi.org/10.2307/2402144
  10. Morita, S and J. Abe. 1996. Root system architecture of rice plants based on formation of phytomers. Proceeding of the international symposium (Maximizing sustainable rice yields through improved soil and environmental management) Thailand
  11. Newman, E. I and Andrews R. E. 1973. Uptake of phosphorus andpotassium in relation to root growth and root density. PIant andSoil 38:49-69 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011217
  12. Newman, E. I. 1966. A method of estimating the total length of root in a sample. J. Appl. Ecol. 3:139-145 https://doi.org/10.2307/2401670
  13. Oyanagi, A., T. Nakamoto and M. Wada. 1993. Relationships betweenroot growth angle of seedlings and vertical distribution of roots inthe field in wheat cultivars. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 62:565-570 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.62.565
  14. Smit A. L., A. G. Bengough, C. Engels, M. van Noordwijk, S. Pellerinand S. C. van De Geijn. 2000. Root methods (A Handbook).Springer Berlin Heidelbrg New York
  15. Tennant, D. 1975. A test of a modified line interaction method of estimating root length. J. of ecology
  16. Waisel Y., E. Amram and Kafkafi U. 1996. Plant roots(The hiddenhalf). Marcel Dekker, New York
  17. Wilhelm, W. W. 1998. Dry-matter partitioning and leaf area of winterwheat grown in a long-term fallow tillage comparisons in the USCentral Great Plains. Soil & Tillage Research 49:40-56
  18. 김한명. 1986. 질소와 토양개량제의 시용이 벼 뿌리의 발달과 활력 및 수량에 미치는 영향. 원광대학교 박사학위논문
  19. 농업기술연구소. 1988. 토양화학분석법. 농촌진흥청
  20. 농촌진흥청. 1995. 농사시험연구조사기준
  21. 류철현, 김종구, 박건호, 김성조. 1988. 논 토양의 이화학적 성질에 미치는 有機物의連用效果 I. 有機物連用 畓의 토양화학성 변화연구. 韓土肥誌 21(4) : 373-379
  22. 박창영, 이재생, 손일수, 박기도, 정연태, 박경배. 최정. 1998. 논토양에서 同一肥料 長期連用에 따른 土壤斷面 형태 및 土質力學性 특성 변화. 농업과학논문집 40(2) : 11-17
  23. 森田茂紀, 岩淵 輝, 山崎耕字. 1986. 水稻1次根の伸長方向と籾重との關係. 日昨紀 52 : 520-525
  24. 신진철. 1988. 수도품종들의 뿌리의 토층분포와 지상부 생육과의관계. 서울대학교 박사학위 논문
  25. 장재기, 김호영, 여운상, 임상종. 이기영, 최해춘, 김순철, 손재근 1999. 벼 담수직파 재배에서 도복저항성에 대한 품종간 차이 및 요인분석. 한작지 31(3) : 232-238
  26. 전원태. 2001. Minirhizotron을 이용한 뿌리 관찰 방법. 농촌진흥청. 연구와 지도 42(9) : 16-18
  27. 정병간, 조국현, 윤을수, 윤정희, 김유학. 1998. 우리나라 논토양의화학적 특성 분석. 한토비지 31(3) : 246-252
  28. 川田信一郎, 丸山辛夫, 副島增夫. 1977. 水稻における根群の形態形成について 'とくに窒素施用量を變更した場含の一例. 日本作物學會. 46 : 193-198