Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association (대한가정학회지)

The Korean Home Economics Association (대한가정학회)
권호 표지

A Study on the Clothing Behavior of High School Students in terms of Creativity, Individuality and Conformity

창의성, 개성, 동조성에 따른 고교생의 의복행동 연구

  • 이선경 (서남대학교 패션디자인학과) ;
  • 정준교 (서남대학교 사회과학부)
  • Published : 2003.01.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study examined the clothing behavior in terms of creativity, individuality and conformity. The subjects were 317 boys(mean age: 18) and 312 girls(mean age: 18) in third grade of high school, in which were situated at north and south part of Han-River in Seoul. They were administered with the following questionnaires to measure the attitudinal and behavioral conformity, creativity, individuality, clothing conformity, clothing nonconformity, clothing confidence, aesthetic sense, clothing importance, fashionability. Results indicated that (1) high school students who have high creativity showed higher scores in clothing nonconformity, clothing confidence, aesthetic sense, clothing importance than those who have low creativity. But there were no significant differences between two groups in clothing conformity and fashionability(p<0.001). (2) High school students who have high individuality showed higher scores in clothing conformity clothing, nonconformity, clothing confidence, aesthetic sense, clothing importance and fashionability than those who have low individuality(p<0.001). (3) Students who have low attitudinal conformity showed higher scores in clothing nonconformity, clothing confidence and aesthetic sense(p<0.001) and lower score in information and norm specific clothing confirmity(p<0.05) than those who have high attitudinal conformity. And those who have high behavioral conformity showed higher score in clothing confirmity than those who have low behavioral confirmity(p<0.05). From these findings, we could find that the importance of creativity and individuality was greater than that of conformity in clothing behavior. These results were discussed and following studies were suggested.

Keywords

References

  1. 강혜원(1974). 대학생의 개성과 유행을 중심으로 한 의상행위와 성격 특성과의 관계. 연세논총, 11, 349-376
  2. 곽금주, 문은영(1993). 청소년의 심리적 특정 및 우울과 비행간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 6(2), 29-43
  3. 김양진(1991). 의복 및 신체 만족도와 학업성취도가 사회적 자아존중감에 미치는 영향. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  4. 김양진(1996). 유행의복이미지가 개인의 자아개념과 의복태도에 미치는 영향 연세대학교 대학원박사학위논문
  5. 김윤회(1990). 여자중학생의 교복에 관한 태도 조사연구. 이화여자대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문
  6. 김정희(1990). 서울시 남.녀고교생의 교복.자유복 착용에 따른 의복행동과 성역할태도의 차이. 경회대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  7. 박광희(1983). 여고생들의 의복행동과 성격특성과의 상관연구. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  8. 박재광(1998). IMF 쇼크와 그 뿌리. 삼성경제연구소 이슈보고서. 서울. 삼성경제연구소
  9. 박혜선(1990). 의복동조에 관한 연구-의복동조동기의 유형, 관련변인, 및 준거집단을 중심으로-. 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
  10. 박혜선, 김화순(1998). 의복태도 유형에 대한 연구. 한국의류학회지, 22(2), 279-289
  11. 송인섭, 김혜숙(1999). 창의성 개념정립을 위한 탐색적 연구-암시적 창의성 이론을 중심으로-. 교육심리연구, 13(3), 93-117
  12. 신옥순(1977). 자아정체감과 외모를 통한 자기개념및 개성에 관한 의복의 심리적 연구. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  13. 이상로, 변창진, 진위교(1989). 표준화 성격 진단 검사 서울: 중앙적성출판사
  14. 이금실(1992). 사회계층변인에 따른 여성의 의복태도와 구매행동에 관한 연구. 연세대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
  15. 이명희(1982). 예의.정숙성과 심미성을 중심으로 한 대학생의 의복행동과 관련된 심리적 변인 연구. 이화여자대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
  16. 이은미(1984). 여자중학생의 성격특성 및 또래집단 수용에 따른 의복행동에 관한 연구. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  17. 전경원(2000). 동.서양의 하모니를 위한 창의학. 서울: 학문사
  18. 정미실(1982). 남자 중.고등학생의 의복행동과 지각향성과의 상관연구. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  19. 정미실(1990). 규범적 및 정보적 영향에 의한 의복 동조성 연구. 연세대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
  20. 정준교. 이선경(1999a). 복장 변형행동의 긍정적 심리효과: 창의성, 의상심미성, 개성, 자기효능감. 청소년학연구. 6(2), 145-175
  21. 정준교, 이선경(1999b). 교복자율화가 성격특성에 미치는 영향. 한국의류학회지. 23(3), 471-482
  22. 최종인(1995). 집단창의성의 결정요인에 관한 연구. 고려대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
  23. 한글학회(1991). 우리말 큰 사전. 서울:어문각
  24. Allport, F. H. (1934). The J-curve hypothesis of conforming behavior. Jounal of Social Psychology, 5, 141-182 https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1934.9919446
  25. Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psyclwlogical Monographs:General and Applied, 70(9), 1-70
  26. Creekmore, A. M. (1966). Methods of measuring clothing variables(Report No. 783). Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station Project
  27. Crutchfield, R. S. (1955). Conformity and character. The American Psychologist, 10, 191-198 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040237
  28. Davis, L. L. (1984). Clothing and human behavior: A review. Home Economics Research Journal, 12(3), 325-339 https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X8401200308
  29. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Jounal of Abnormal and Social Psyclwlogy, 51, 629-636 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046408
  30. Fromkin, H. L. (1973). The psychology of uniqueness: Avoidance of similarity and seeking of differentness. In G. B. Sproles(1979). Fashion: Consumer behavior toward dress. Minnesota:Burgess Publishing Company
  31. Hollander, E. P., & Willis, R. H. (1964). Conformity, independence and anticonformity as determiners of perceived influence and attraction. In E. P. Hollander(ed.), Leaders, groups and influence, New York: Oxford University
  32. Hom, M. J., & Gurel, L. M. (1981). The second skin: An interdisciplinary study of clothing(3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co
  33. Hunter, M. K. (1967). A Comparison of clothing between negro and white women of low social-economic status. Unpublished Master thesis. University of Missouri. In A. M. Creekmore(ed.), Metlwds of measuring clothing variables(Report No. 783). Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station Project
  34. Hurlock, E. B. (1929). The psychology of dress, New York: Arno Press Inc
  35. Jahoda, M. (1959). Conformity and independence: A psychological analysis. Human Relations, 12, 99-119 https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675901200201
  36. Kefgen, M., & Touchie-Specht, P. (1976). Individuality in clothing selection and personal appearance (2nd ed.).NewYork: MacMillan
  37. Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Jounal of ConflU:t Resolution, 2, 59-60 https://doi.org/10.1177/002200275800200106
  38. Kelley, H. H. (1952). Two functions of reference group. In G. E. Swanson, T. M. Newcomb, & E. L. Hartley(ed.). Readings in social psychology. New York: Holt
  39. Kiesler, C. A., & Kiesler, S. B. (1969). Conformity. Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley
  40. Levine, D. N. (1971). George Simmel on individuality and social form. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
  41. Maslach, C., Stapp, J., & Santee, R. T. (1985). Individuation: conceptual analysis and assessment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 729-738 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.729
  42. Maslach, C., Santee, R. T., & Wade, C. (1987). Individuation, gender role, and dissent:Personality mediators of situational forces. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1088-1093 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1088
  43. Moschis, G. P. (1976). Social comparison and informal group influence. Journal of Marketing Research, 13(3), 237-244 https://doi.org/10.2307/3150733
  44. Park, C. W., & Lessig, V. P. (1977). Students and housewives: Differences in susceptibility to reference group influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 102-110 https://doi.org/10.1086/208685
  45. Rabolt, N. J., & Drake, M. F. (1984-1985). Reference person influence on career women's dress. Clothing andTextile Research Journal, 3(2), 11-19
  46. Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305-310
  47. Roach, M. E., & Eicher, J. B. (1965). Dress, adornment, and the social order. N.Y.: JohnWiley and Sons
  48. Selker, M. L. (1962). Conformity in dress: An exploration in the development of a measure. Unpublished master thesis, Pennsylvania State University, in A. M. Creekmore(ed.). Methods of measuring clothing variables(Report No. 783). Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station Project
  49. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Creative giftedness: A multivariate investment approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(1), 7-15
  50. Strutton, D., Pelton, L. E., & Lumpkin, J. R (1995). Sex difference in ingratiatory behavior: An investigation of influence tactics in the saleperson-eustomer dyad. Journal of Business Research, 34, 35-45 https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(94)00040-L
  51. Taylor, L. C. (1967). Conformity in dress and selected color, design, texture and personality variables. Unpublished master thesis. Utah State University
  52. Torrance, E. P. (1972). Predictive validity of the Torrance Tests of creative thinking. Journal of Creative Behavior, 6(4), 236-252 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1972.tb00936.x
  53. Walker, E. L., & Heyns, R. W. (1962). An anatomy of conformity. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall
  54. Willis, R. H. (1963). Two dimensions of conformitynonconformity. Sociometry, 26, 499-513 https://doi.org/10.2307/2786152
  55. Willis, R. H., & Hollander, E. P. (1964). An experimental study of three response modesin social influence situation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 150-156 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048705