Development of Small Area Health Promotion Indicator for Community Health Initiative

지역보건 관련 소지역간 건강증진지표 개발에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Chun-Bae (Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine) ;
  • Go, Kawung-Uk (Department of Preventive Medicine, Kosin University, School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Jae-Sung (Department of Health Care Administration, Kosin University, School of Health Science) ;
  • Choe, Heon (Department of Health Services Administration, Seonam University)
  • 김춘배 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 고광욱 (고신대학교 의학부 예방의학교실) ;
  • 박재성 (고신대학교 보건과학부 의료경영학과) ;
  • 최헌 (서남대학교 병원행정학과)
  • Published : 2003.03.01

Abstract

Purpose: Although there is a lot of secondary data available for comparing community health status and planning health policies in terms of large area such as metropolitan cities or provinces, there is restricted data for establishing community health policies of the small areas such as towns, Gun(i.e., districts), and Gu. Specifically, the problems of producing a valuable index for health promotion in small areas are three fold: First, there is not an appropriate index model for measuring a small community health status. Second, a large part of secondary data in the small areas has been produced in an irregular time interval. In addition, all valuable data can not be integrated without time consuming work. Thus this study tries to establish a health promotion index model for assisting community health promotion initiatives of local governments. Methods and materials: Literature review, community health specialist consultation and a questionnaire survey was performed. Results: Based on Dever's model, a prototype of health promotion indicators was proposed and modified by the community health specialists. 15 classification scheme of statistical yearbook reorganized into the six areas. Those six areas were comprised in 24 indicator class with 96 specific indicators. Through further modification processes by a questionnaire survey, we developed a health promotion indicator model that contains six areas with 23 indicator class encompassed by 87 specific indicators. Conclusions: This study proposed a model of health promotion indicator comprised in the six areas with 23 indicator classes for measuring small area health promotion status. However, more specific or additional data in human biology, environment, and socioeconomic data is essential for producing a stronger model for health promotion measurement.

Keywords

References

  1. 경제기획원 조사통계국. 소지역통계지도(1980년 인구 및 주택 센서스 결과). 1987
  2. 경제기획원 조사통계국. 소지역통계지도(1985년 인구 및 주택 센서스 결과). 1990
  3. 계훈방, 고경환. 보건통지통계연보 개편방안. 한국보건사회연구원, 1997
  4. 계훈방, 이송욱. 보건복지통계 개선방안에 관한 연구. 한국보건사회연구원, 1995
  5. 고광욱, 이용환, 조병만, 김춘배. 담배소비세액 자료에 의한 연도별 지역별 담배소비량 변동 양상, 고신대학교 의학부 학술지 2001;16(1):35-44
  6. 국민건강보험공단. 건강보험통계연보 제21호,
  7. 김춘배, 최헌, 신계철, 박종구, 함수근, 김은미. 소규모 지역간 결핵관리사업 성과에 대한 시계열 분석-전국 234개 시군구보건소의 환자동록자료를 중심으로- 결핵 및 호홉기 질환 2000;48(6):837-852
  8. 대한의무기록협회. 보건의료통계 생성을 위한 지역단위 모니터링체계 구축방안에 관한 워크숍. 2001
  9. 보건복지부. 98국민건강.영양조사 1999
  10. 보건복지부. 만성질환 통계생산 방안마련을 위한 세미나. 2002
  11. 보건복지부. 2003년도 보건복지정보화촉진시행계획. 2002
  12. 성균관대학교 의과대학, 충북대학교 의과대학, 건양대학교 의과대학, 단국대학교 의과대학, 대한의무기록사 협회. 보건통계 산출방법론 도출 및 모니터링 방안개발. 2002
  13. 통계청. 시 군 구 주요통계지표. 1999
  14. 통계청. 사망원인통계연보. 2000
  15. 행정자치부. 한국도시연감, 행정자치부 지역진홍과. 2000
  16. Dever A. Community Health Anaysis. Second Edition, AN ASPEN PUBLICATION. 1991
  17. Lalonde M. A New Perspective on the Health of Canadians. Office of Canadian Minister of National Health and Welfare. 1974