Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion (보건교육건강증진학회지)

Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion (한국보건교육건강증진학회)
권호 표지

The Conditions and Problems of Anti-Smoking Education Programs of Governmental Offices

전국 관청의 금연프로그램 실시 현황과 문제점

  • Lee, Sang-Wook (Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, College of Medicine, Kwandong University) ;
  • Ohrr, Hee-Choul (Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, College of Medicine, Yonsei University) ;
  • Yi, Jee-Jeon (Graduate School of Health Science and Management, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Wook (Department of Public Health, Graduate school of Yonsei University) ;
  • Huh, Nam-Uk (Department of Public Health, Graduate school of Yonsei University)
  • 이상욱 (관동대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 오희철 (연세대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 이지전 (연세대학교 보건대학원) ;
  • 김태욱 (연세대학교 대학원 보건학과) ;
  • 허남욱 (연세대학교 대학원 보건학과)
  • Published : 2003.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the conditions and problems of anti-smoking education programs in government office for civil servants. A mail-in survey was carried out for the chief of the general affairs of 248 government offices. 1. There were 154 responses to the surveys. Only 34 governmental offices have carried out anti-smoking education programs for civil servants. 2. Only one office has a department to supervise and anti-smoking program. 17 offices have 1 worker and thirteen offices have no manpower to supervise anti-smoking program. 3. Only eight offices have budgeted for anti-smoking programs. The average budget was 3,750,000 Won. Expected budget for smoking cessation program was 7,500,000 Won. 4. 25 offices have an anti-smoking lecture program for civil servants. Only five offices have an anti-smoking counseling for smokers. 5. Only seven surveys responded that civil servants had a positive response to anti-smoking programs. 6. The most important problem of anti-smoking programs in governmental offices was the lack of concern of civil servants. Governmental offices have to provide the greatest administrative services and services concerning the quality of life for citizens. Anti-smoking education programs in governmental offices for civil servants was the beginning of an activity of the services concerning the quality of life for citizens. Governmental offices have to actively implement anti-smoking programs for civil servants.

Keywords

References

  1. 금연운동협의회 홈페이지. http://www.kash.or.kr/
  2. 김복규. 새정부 출범에 따른 지방정치 개편방안 ; 지방공무원의 효율적 관리방안. 한국행정연구 1998;7:89-107
  3. 김선애. 금연프로그램의 장기효과분석. 연세대학교 보건대학원 석사논문, 1998
  4. 김소야자. 권인숙. 인터넷 탐색과 비디오 시청에 따른 고등학생의 금연교육 효과. 간호학탐구 2000;9:118-143
  5. 김은숙. 조원정. 서울시내 중.고등학교에서의 금연 교육실태. 보건교육.건강증진학회지 1990;7:59-70
  6. 김일순. 알고 계십니까? 담배의 해독을. 금연운동협의회, 2001
  7. 김판석, 박중훈. 행정서비스 종합대책의 구상 - 공공기관의 고객만족도 평가지표 개발. 한국행정연구원, 1996
  8. 김한중. 국민보건향상과 지역균형에 대한 중앙정부의 역할. 대한보건협회, 1995
  9. 백윤자. 정문숙. 권진회. 공공기관 근무자의 금연구역내 홉연실태. 보건교육.건강증진학회지 2000;17:229-237
  10. 보건복지부. 1998년 국민건강영양조사. 보건복지부, 1999
  11. 서미경. 공익광고를 통한 금연교육 효과 분석. 보건교육.건강증진학회지 2000;17:151-162
  12. 서원석. 김광주. 사회와 정부역할에 대한 인식. in 한국행정연구원. 공무원의 의식과 행태에 관한 연구. 한국행정연구원, 1992
  13. 서진완. 공공기관의 보편적 행정서비스의 제공과 콘텐츠. 한국행정학회. 2000년도 동계학술대회 발표논문집. 2000
  14. 신숙호. 훈련소 금연교육이 군 생활 중 홉연행태에 미치는 영향. 연세대학교 보건대학원 석사논문, 1998
  15. 오회철, 지선하, 서홍관, 손태용, 이순영 등. 금연실천 프로그램 실태파악 및 지원시책 제도화 방안 연구. 보건복지부, 2001
  16. 이영숙. 음주문제 예방을 위한 효과적인 보건교육 방안에 관한 연구. 보건교육.건강증진학회지 1995;12:139-145
  17. 한겨레신문. 공무원 총정원 27만명 선 묶기로. 1998년 11월 4일 뉴스 2면
  18. Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical Journals. J Clin Epiderniol 1997;50(10):1129-1136 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00126-1
  19. Davis KL, DeKemper PR, A new model for a smoking cessation program: adding compliance efforts and provider education to the mix. Med Interface 1994;7:67-69
  20. Delbert CM. Handbook of Research Design and Social Measurement. SAGE publications 1991
  21. Freels SA, Warnecke RB, Parsons JA, Johnson TP, Flay BR, et al. Characteristics associated with exposure to and participation in a televised smoking cessation intervention program for women with high school or less education. Prev Med 1999;28:579-588 https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1999.0484
  22. Israel BA, Cummings KM:, Dignan MB, Heaney CA, Perales DP et al. Evaluation of health education programs: current assessment and future directions. Health Educ Q. 1995;22:364-389
  23. Parker C, Dewey M. Assessing research outcomes by postal questionnaire with telephone follow-up. TOTAL Study Group. Trial of Occupational Therapy and Leisure. Int J Epidemiol 2000;29(6):1005-1009
  24. Streiff MB, Dundes L, Spivak lL. A mail survey of United States hematologists and oncologists: a comparison of business reply versus stamped return envelopes. J Clin Epidemiol, 2001 Apr;54(4):430-432 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00277-8
  25. Urban N, Anderson GL, Tseng A Effects on response rates and costs of stamps vs business reply in a mail survey of physicians. J Clin Epidemiol, 1993 May;46(5):455-459 https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90022-S
  26. World Bank. Curbing the Epidemics: Governments and the Economics of Tobacco Control. Washington D. C., The World Bank. 1999
  27. World Health Organization. World Health Report 1999. World Health Organization. 2001