The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지

A SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF RESIN CEMENTS BONDED TO PRESSABLE PORCELAIN WITH VARIOUS SURFACE TREATMENTS

  • Lee Jong-Yeop (Department of Dentistry, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Im Eui-Bin (Department of Dentistry, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • Published : 2003.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Statement of problem. Resin cements are widely used in adhesive dentistry specially on all ceramic restorations. It is needed to find out adequate bonding strength between different porcelain surface treatments, commercially available porcelains, and different resin cement systems. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate shear bond strength of resin cements bonded to porcelains in three different modalities; 5 different porcelain surface treatments, 3 different resin cement systems and 3 different commercially available pressable porcelains. Material and Method. This study consisted of 3 parts. Part I examined the effect of five different surface treatments on the pressable porcelain. Fifty discs (5 mm in diameter and 3 mm in height) of Authentic porcelain were randomly divided into 5 groups (n = 10). The specimens were sanded with 320 grit SiC paper followed by 600 grit SiC paper. The specimens were treated as follow: Group 1-Sandblasting (aluminum oxide) only, Group 2 - sandblasting/ silane, Group 3 - sandblasting/ acid etching/ silane, Group 4 - acid etching only, Group 5 - acid etching/ silane. Part II examined the shear bond strength of 3 different resin cement systems (Duolink, Variolink II, Rely X ARC) on acid etching/ silane treated Authentic pressable porcelain. Part 3 examined the shear bond strength of Duolink resin cement on 3 different pressable porcelains (Authentic, Empress I, Finesse). All cemented specimens were stored in distilled water for 2 hours and tested with Ultradent shear bond strength test jig under Universal Instron machine until fracture. An analysis of variance(ANOVA) test was used to evaluate differences in shear bond strength. Result. The shear bond strength test resulted in the following: (1) Acid etched porcelains recorded greater shear bond strength values to the sandblasted porcelains. (2) Silane treated porcelains recorded greater shear bond strength values to non-silane treated porcelains. (3) There was no significant difference between sandblasting/ acid etching/ silane treated and acid etching/ silane treated porcelains. However those values were much higher than other three groups. (4) The shear bond strength with Variolink II was lower than the value of Duolink or Rely X ARC. (5) The shear bond strength of Finesse was lower than the value of Authentic or Empress I.

Keywords

References

  1. Horn, H.R., Porcelain laminate veneers bonded to etched enamel. Dental Clinics of North America 1983;27:671
  2. Stangel, I, Nathanson. D., Hsu, C.S., Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain. J Dent Rest 1987;66:1460-5
  3. Chen, J. H., Matsumura, H., Atsuta, M., Effect of etching period on the bond strength pf a composite resin to a machinable porcelain. J Dentistry 1998;28:53-58
  4. Millet, D.T., McCube, J.F., Bennett, T.G., Carter, N.E., Gordan, P,H., The effect of sandblasting on the retention of first molar orthodontic bands cemented with glass ionomer cement. British J of Orthodontics 1995;22:161
  5. Calamia, J.R., Simonsen, R. J., Effect of coupling agent on bond strength of etched porcelain. J Dent Rest 1984;63:179
  6. Lacy, A.M., Laluz, J., Watanabe, L.G., Dellinges, M., Effect of porcelain surface treatment on the bond to composite. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:288-91 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90270-3
  7. Rochette, A.L., A ceramic bonded by etched enamel and resin for fractured incisors. J Prosthet Dent 1975;33(3):287-293 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(75)80085-0
  8. Barghi, N., To silnate or not to silanate: making a clinical decision. Compendium 2000;21:660-664
  9. Buonocore, M.G., A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling material to enamel surface, J Dent Res 1955;34:849-853
  10. Kanca, J.III., Improving bond strength through acid etching of dentin and bonding to wet dentin surface. JADA 1992;123:35-42
  11. Ozcan, M., Pfeiffer, P., Nergiz, I., A brief history and current status of metal and ceramic surface conditioning concepts for resin bonding in dentistry. Quintessence International 1988;29:713-723
  12. Neikes, M.L Kern, M., Strab, J.R., Tensile bond strength of two silicoating(silicatel silanization) systems on the $Al_2O_3$ In-Ceram, J Dent Rest 1992;71:533
  13. Aida, M., Hayakawa, T., Mizukawa, K., Adhesion of composite to porcelain with various surface conditions. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:464 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80076-9
  14. Shahverdi. S., Canay. E., Bilge. A, Effect of different surface treatment methods on the bond strength of 386 composite resin to porcelain. J of Oral Rehabil 1998:25;699-705
  15. Pecola, N., Yaman, Peter., Dennison, Ioseph., Herrero. Alberto., Comparison of shear bond strength relative to two testing device. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:511-515 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.129063
  16. Hara AT., Pimenta, LA, Rodrigues, L.A, Influence of cross-head speed on resin -dentin shear bond strength. Dent Meter 2001;14:319-323