Development of Handles for Liquid Container through the Evaluation of User Preferences

사용자 선호도 평가를 통한 액체 저장용기의 손잡이 개발

  • Received : 20021200
  • Accepted : 20030700
  • Published : 2003.12.31

Abstract

In this study, a prototype liquid container combined with auxiliary handles was designed to increase the safety of manual handling and protect from contamination of hands of people who use these containers. Likert summated rating method as well as pairwise ranking test was applied to evaluate the user preferences for provided handles of the container under the conditions of different shapes and positions. The results show that the subjects preferred perpendicular orientation of the handle on the top of the liquid container while carrying the containers and the crosswise position of the handle at the side of the container while pouring the liquid were preferred. A prototype liquid container with provided auxiliary handles was developed based on the results of evaluation. It is thus recommended that the liquid container provide extra handles to reduce the musculoskeletal stress and in turn to increase the user satisfaction.

Keywords

References

  1. Armstrong, T. J. (1986), Ergonomics and cumulative trauma disorders, Hand Clinics, 2, 553-566
  2. Ayoub, M. A. (1977), Optimum design of containers for manual material handling tasks, Applied Ergonomics, 8(2), 67-72
  3. Ayoub, M. A. (1982), Control of manual lifting hazards: Job redesign, Journal of Occupational Medicine, 24, 668-676
  4. Ayoub, M. A. and LoPresti, P. (1971), The determination of an optimum size cylindrical handle by use of electromyography, Ergonomics, 4(4), 503-518
  5. Ayoub, M. A. and Mital, A. (1989), Manual Materials Handling, London, Taylor & Francis.
  6. Ciriello, V. M., Snook, S. H., and Hughes, G. H. (1993), Further studies of psychophysically determined maximum acceptable weights and forces, Human Factors, 35,175-186
  7. Drury, C. G. (1980), Handles for manual materials handling, Applied Ergonomics, 11(1), 35-42
  8. Garg, A. and Saxena, U. (1980), Container characteristics and maximum acceptable weight of lift, Human Factors, 22, 487-495
  9. Khalil, T. (1973), An electromyographic methodology for the evaluation of industrial design, Human Factors, 15(3), 257-264
  10. Kim, H. K. (1997), Physiological viewpoint of the recommended safe weights of load for manual materials handling tasks, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 16(3), 23-36
  11. Marley, R. J. and Wehrman, R. R. (1992), Grip strength as a function of forearm rotation and elbow posture, Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meetings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Atlanta, 791-795
  12. Mital, A. and Okolie, S. (1982), Influence of container shape, partitions, frequency, distance, and height level on the maximum acceptable amount of liquid carried by males, American Industrial Hygiene Assoaation Journal, 43, 813-819
  13. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (1981), Work Practice Guide for Manual Lifting. Publication No. 81-122
  14. Park, J. S., Kim, H. K., Choi, J. Y. (1996), Comparison analysis of physiological work capacity for different tasks, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 15(2), 89-98
  15. Pheasant, S. T. and ONeill,D. (1975), Performance in gripping and turning: A study in hand/handle effectiveness, Applied Ergonomics, 6, 205-208
  16. Rigby, L. V.(1973), Why do people drop things, Quality Progress, 6(9),16-19
  17. Sanders, M. S. and McCormick, E.J. (1992), Human Factors in Engineering and Design, Seventh Edition, NewYork, McGraw-Hill, Inc
  18. Saran, C. (1973), Biomechanical evaluation of T-handles for a pronation supination task, Journal of Occupational Medicine, 15(9), 712-716
  19. Smith, J. and Jiang, B. (1984), A manual materials handling study of bag lifting, American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 45, 505-508
  20. Terrel, Rand Purswell, J. (1976). The Influence of Forearm and Wrist Orientation on Static Grip Strength as a Design Criterion for Hand Tools. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 20th Annual Meeting, Human Factors Society, 28-32
  21. Timm, W. N, O'Driscoll, S. W., Johnson, M. E., and An, K. N. (1993), Functional comparison of pronation and supination strengths, Journal of Hand Therapy, 6(3), 190-193
  22. Woodson, W. E. and Conover, D. W. (1964), Human Engineering Guide for Equipment Designers, Berkeley, California, University of California Press