EXPRESSION OF TYPE I, TYPE II COLLAGEN ON DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS IN THE RABBIT MANDIBLE

가토 하악골에서 신연 골형성술시 제 I형 및 II형 교원질의 발현

  • Kang, Dae-Sil (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School of Clinical Dental Science, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Jee, Yu-Jin (Division of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dentistry, St. Vincent's Hosptital, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Song, Hyun-Chul (Division of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dentistry, St. Vincent's Hosptital, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • 강대실 (가톨릭대학교 임상치과학대학원 구강악악면외과학과) ;
  • 지유진 (가톨릭대학교 성빈센트병원 치과 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 송현철 (가톨릭대학교 성빈센트병원 치과 구강악안면외과)
  • Published : 2004.08.31

Abstract

The purpose of this experiment was to examine the histological changes and the pattern of expression of type I, II collagen in the elongated area by distraction osteogenesis in the rabbit mandible. Sixteen rabbits weighing 2.5kg-3kg were used for this experiment. Experimental group was distracted at the rate of 0.7mm, twice/day for 7days, and control group was only osteotomized. After 5 days latency, osteotomic site is distracted for 7days. Consolidation period is 28days. The animal was sacrificed at the 3rd, 7th, 14th, 28th day after the operation. The distracted bone was examined by histological analysis and RT-PCR analysis. The results were summarized as follows: 1. Experimental group was observed that the gaps between the distracted bone edges were occupied by new bone. 2. Expression of Type I collagen were detected throughout the experiment in both groups and Expression of Type I collagen were markedly increased during distraction and consolidation period in experimental group than control group. 3. Expression of Type II collagen were detected throughout the experiment in both groups and expression of Type II collagen were maintained at high level during distraction and consolidation period in experimental group than control group. From these results, in contrast to type II collagen, type I collagen seemed to be more expressed by mechanical stimuli during distraction and consolidation period. The predominent mechanism of new bone formation in the distraction gap was intramembranous bone formation, but some of the regenerated bone was formed by endochondral ossification.

Keywords

References

  1. Codivilla A: On the means of lengthening in the lower limb, the muscles and tissues which are shortened through deformity. Am J Orthop Surg 1905;2:353-359
  2. lizarov GA: The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues; I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation. Clin Orthop 1989;238:249
  3. Ilizarov GA: The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues; II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop 1989;239:263
  4. Snyder CC, Levine GA, Swanson HM, Browne EZJ: Mandibular lengthening by gradual distraction. Preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973;51:506-508 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197305000-00003
  5. Costantino PD, shybut G, Friedman CD, Pelzer HJ, Masini M, Shindo ML et al: Segmental mandibular regeneration by distraction osteogenesis. An experimental study. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg 1990;116:535-545
  6. McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N, Throne CH, Grayson BH: Lengthening the humam mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;18:280
  7. Karaharju-Suvanto T, Karaharju EO, Ranta R: Mandibular distraction. An experimental study on sheep. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1990;18:280
  8. Karahaju-Suvanto T, Peltonen J, Kahri A, Karaharju EO: Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. An experimental study on sheep. J Maxillofac Surg 1992;21:118
  9. Warren SM, Mehrara BJ, Steinbrech DS, Paccione MF, Greenwald JA, Spector JA et al: Rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Part III Gradual distraction versus acute lengthening. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:441-453 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200102000-00021
  10. Proffit WR. Etiologic factors in the development of dentofacial deformity In: White RPJ. Surgical Orthodontic Treatment. St. Louis, Mosby-Year Book Inc. 1991;24-70
  11. 임순모, 안병근, 박영주, 박희건, 박준우, 이건주 등: 성견 하악골체부 신장시 신장부위의 증식세포핵항원과 제 I형 교원질 발현에 관한 연구. 대구외지 2001;27:385-393
  12. Ten cate AR. ORAL HISTOLOGY. development structure and function. St. Louis, Mosby Co. 1985
  13. Lane JM, Suda M, von der Mark K, Timpl R: Immunofluorescent localization of structural collagen types in endochondral fracture repair. J Orthop Res 1986;4:318-329 https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100040308
  14. Sato M, Yaui N, Nakase T, Kawahata H, Sumimoto M, Hirota S et al: Expression of bone matrix proteins mRNA during distraction osteogenesis. J Bone Miner res 1998;13:1221-1231 https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.8.1221
  15. Ashhurst DE: Collagens synthesized by healing fractures. Clin Orthop 1990;255:273-283
  16. Kallio TJ, Vauhkonen MV, Peltonen JI, Karaharju EO: Early bone matrix formation during distraction. A biochemical study in sheep. Acta Orthop Scand 1994;65:467-471 https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679408995494
  17. Sandberg M, Aro H, Multimaki P, Aho H, Vuorio E: In situ localization of collagen production by chondrocytes and osteoblasts in fracture callus. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1989;71:69-77 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198971010-00012
  18. Yasui N, Kojimoto H, Sasaki K, Kitada A, Shimizu H, Shimoura Y: Factors affecting callus distraction in limb lengthening. Clin Orthop 1993;293:55-60
  19. Yasui N, Sato M, Ochi T, Kawahata H, Kitamura Y, Nomura S: Three modes of ossification during distraction osteogenesis in the rat. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997;79:824-830 https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.79B5.7423
  20. Carter DR, Blenman PR, Beaupre GS: Correlations between mechanical stress history and tissue differntiation in initial fracture healing. J Orthop Res 1988;6:736-748 https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100060517
  21. Chidgey L, Chakkalakal D, Blotcky A, Connolly JF: Vascular reorganization and return of rigidity in fracture healing. J Orthop Res 1986;4:173-179 https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100040205
  22. Morone MA, Boden SD, Hair G: Gene expression during autograft lumbar spine fusion and the effect of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 Clin Orthop 1998;351:252-265