Affecting Factors of Outcome of CC/hMG Ovarian Stimulation and Intrauterine Insemination

CC/hMG 배란유도 인공수정시 치료 결과에 영향을 주는 요인

Yang, Yun-Seok;Park, Jang-Ok;Oh, Kwan-Young;Lee, Byung-Kwan;Park, Joon-Sook;Lee, Jin-Yong
양윤석;박장옥;오관영;이병관;박준숙;이진용

  • Published : 20040700

Abstract

Objective : We have attempted to identify prognostic factors regarding CC/hMG ovarian stimulation and IUI in infertility and to seek factors valuable in planning infertility treatment and predicting the success rate of IUI therapy in individual couples. Methods : The variables selected for initial analysis were female age, duration of infertility, type and diagnosis of infertility, number of pre-ovulatory follicles ($\geq$16 mm, $\geq$18 mm follicles), thickness of the endometrium, number of the treatment cycles, result of semen analysis, ovarian stimulation protocol, number of IUI. A logistic regression method was used to identify significant variables that contribute to the success of CC/hMG/IUI treatment. Results : Logistic regression analysis revealed four predictive variables as regards pregnancy: duration of infertility (p=0.011), infertility etiology (p=0.049), number of IUI (p=0.004), method of ovarian stimulation (p=0.042). A cause of infertility, especially ovarian dysfunction other than tubal factor, a shorter duration of infertility (<6 years) and CC/hMG minimal ovarian stimulation protocol with double IUI resulted in better treatment success in CC/hMG with IUI cycles. Conclusion : We concluded that careful patient selection criteria coupled with successful ovarian stimulation and increased sperm count in female reproductive tract is the model for CC/hMG/IUI sucess.

목적 : 불임환자의 치료를 위한 CC/hMG/IUI 173주기를 후향적으로 분석하여 임신결과에 영향을 미치는 요인을 분석함으로서 보다 효율적인 불임치료 계획을 수립하고 환자 개개인에 대한 인공수정의 성공 가능성을 예측하는데 도움이 되고자 하였다. 연구 방법 : 2001년 3월부터 2003년 3월까지 2년 동안 총 173주기의 CC/hMG/IUI시 치료 결과에 영향을 미칠 수 있는 환자 나이 (35세 미만과 35세 이상), 불임 기간 (6년 미만과 6년 이상), 불임 형태 (일차성, 이차성), 불임 원인 (배란장애, 남성불임, 자궁인자, 원인불명, 난관인자), 자궁내막 두께 (6 mm 미만과 6 mm 이상), 성숙난포의 수 ($\geq$16 mm, $\geq$18 mm follicle), 정액검사 (WHO criteria, IUI threshold, Sub-IUI threshold), CC/hMG 복합투여 배란유도 방법 (Day 3 CC/hMG full stimulation, Day 5 CC/hMG full stimulation, CC/hMG minimal stimulation or enhancement protocol), 인공수정 횟수 (double IUI, single IUI, IUI & timed intercourse)등에 대하여 로지스틱 회귀분석을 하였다. 결과 : 총 임상적 임신율은 19.7%였고 이중 다태아 임신율은 26.4%, 유산율 14.7%, 자궁외 임신은 11.7%였다. 로지스틱 회귀분석에서 CC/hMG 복합투여 배란유도시 임신에 대한 예측변수로 불임 기간 (p=0.011), 불임 원인 (p=0.049), CC/hMG 배란유도 방법 (p=0.042), 인공수정 횟수 (p=0.004) 등을 얻었다. 불임 기간이 6년 미만 (versus $\geq$6 years), 배란장애 (versus tubal factor), CC/hMG 최소자극법 (versus Day 3 CC/hMG full stimulation), double IUI (versus single IUI)에 대한 odds ratio는 각각 19.87, 5.11, 2.59, 6.07이였다. 결론 : CC/hMG/IUI 시행하는 경우 불임 원인이 배란장애이고, 불임 기간이 6년 미만이며, CC/hMG 복합투여 배란유도 방법 중 CC/hMG 최소자극법을 사용하고, 인공수정 1번한 경우 보다 2번 한 경우에 보다 높은 치료 성공을 예측할 수 있었다. 그러므로 주의 깊게 환자를 선택하고 적절한 배란유도 방법을 사용하며 여성의 생식기관에 보다 많은 정자가 투입된 경우에 보다 좋은 CC/hMG/IUI 치료 결과를 얻을 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Sunde A, Kahn JA, Molne K. Intrauterine insemination: a European collaborative report. Hum Reprod 1988; 2: 69-73.
  2. Peterson CM, Hatasaka HH, Jones KP, Poulson AM Jr, Carrell DT, Urry RL. Ovulation induction with gonadotropins and intrauterine insemination compared with in vitro fertilization and no therapy: a prospective, nonrandomized, cohort study and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 994; 62(3): 535-44.
  3. Cohlen BJ, te Velde ER, van Kooij RJ, Looman CW, Habbema JD. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treating male subfertility: a controlled study. Hum Reprod 1998; 13(6): 1553-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.6.1553
  4. Fanchin R, Olivennes F, Righini C, Hazout A, Schwab B, Frydman R. A new system for fallopian tube sperm perfusion leads to pregnancy rates twice as high as standard intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1995; 64(3): 505-10.
  5. Kalstrom PO, Bergh T, Fundkvist O. A Prostective randomized trial of artificial insemination versus intercourse in cycles stimulated with human menopausal gonadotropin or clomiphen cycles. Fertil Steril 1993; 59: 554-9.
  6. Dickey RP, Olar TT, Taylor SN, Curole DN, Rye PH, Matulich EM. Relationship of follicle number, serum estradiol, and other factors to birth rate and multiparity in human menopausal gonadotropin-induced intrauterine insemination cycles. Fertil Steril 1991; 56(1): 89-92.
  7. Dickey RP, Olar TT, Taylor SN, Curole DN, Rye PH. Relationship of follicle number and other factors to fecundability and multiple pregnancy in clomiphene citrate-induced intrauterine insemination cycles. Fertil Steril 1992; 57(3): 613-9.
  8. Mathieu C, Ecochard R, Bied V, Lormage J, Czyba JC. Cumulative conception rate following intrauterine artifical insemination with husband's spermatozoa: influence of husband's age. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 1090-7.
  9. Tomlinson M, Amissah-Arthur JB, Tompson KA, Kasraie JL, Bentick B. Prognostic indicators for intrauterine insemiantion(IUI): statistic model for IUI sucess. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 1892-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019513
  10. Nuojua-Huttunen S, Tuomivaara L, Juntunen K, Tomas C, Martikainen H. Comparison of fallopian tube sperm perfusion with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. Fertil Steril 1997; 67(5): 939-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81411-2
  11. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Matual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interaction. 2nd ed. Cambridge(UK): Cambridge Umiversity Press; 1992.
  12. Dickey RP, Taylor SN, Lu PY, Sartor BM, Rye PH, Pyrzak R. Effect of diagnosis, age, sperm quality, and number of preovulatory follicles on the outcome of multiple cycles of clomiphene citrate-intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 2002; 78(5): 1088-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04212-7
  13. Dodson WC, Haney AF. Controlleded ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treatemnt of infertility. Fertil Steril 1991; 55: 457-67.
  14. Nulsen JC, Walsh S, Dumea S, Metzger DA. A randomized and longitudinal study of humanopausal gonadotropin with intrauterine insemination in treatment of infertility. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 87: 780-6.
  15. Ploker SM, Jacobson W, Amato P. Predicting and optimizing success in an intrauterine insemination program. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 2014-21.
  16. Zikopoulos K, West CP, Thong PWM, et al. Homologous intrauteirne insemiantion has no advantage over timed natural intercourse when used in combination with ovulation induction for the treatment of unexplained infertility. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 563-9.
  17. Martinez AR, Bemardus RE, Voorhorst FJ, Vermeiden JPW, Schoemaker J. Pregnancy rates after timed intercourse or intrauterine insemination after human menopausal gonadotropin stimulation of normal ovualtory cycles: A controlled study. Fertil Steril 1991; 55: 258-65.
  18. Van Der Westerlaken LA, Naaktgeboren N, Helmerhorst FM. Evaluation of pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination according to indication, age, and sperm parameters. J Assist Reprod Genet 1998; 15: 359-64. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022576831691
  19. Chaffkin LM, Nulsen JC, Luciano AA, Metzger DA. A comparative analysis of the cycle fecundity rates associated with combined human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) and intrauterine insemination (IUI) versus either hMG or IUI alone. Fertil Steril 1991; 55(2): 252-7.
  20. Remohi J, Gastaldi C, Patrizio P, Gerli S, Ord T, Asch RH, Balmaceda JP. Intrauterine insemination and controlled ovarial hyperstimulation in cycles before GIFT. Hum Reprod 1989; 4: 918-20.
  21. Siverberg KM, Jonson JV, Olive DL, Burns WN, Schenken RS. A prospective randomized trial comparing two different intrauterine insemination regimens in controlled hyperstimulation cycles. Fertil Steril 1992; 57: 357-61.
  22. Huang FJ, Chang SY, Chang JC, Kung FT, Wu JF, Tsai MY. Timed intercourse after intrauterine insemination for treatment of infertility. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998 Oct; 80(2): 257-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-2115(98)00114-6
  23. Cantineau AE, Heineman MJ, Cohlen BJ. Single versus double intrauterine insemination (IUI) in stimulated cycles for subfertile couples: a systematic review based on a Cochrane review. Hum Reprod 2003 May; 18(5): 941-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg178
  24. Ransom MX, Blotner MB, Bohrer M, Corsan G, Kemmann E. Does increasing frequency of intrauterine insemination improve pregnancy rates significantly during superovulation cycles?. Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 303-7.
  25. Nakanrura Y, Ono M, YoShida Y, Sugino N, Ueda K, Kato H. Effects of clomiphene citrate on the endometrial thickness and echogenic pattern of the endometrium. Fertil Steril 1997; 67: 256-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81907-3
  26. Gonen Y, Casper RF. Sonographic determination of a possible adverse effect of clomiphene citrate on endometrial growth. Hum Reprod 1990; 5(6): 670-4.
  27. Dickey RP, Olar TT, Taylor SN, Curole DN, Matulich EM. Relationship of endometrial thickness and pattern to fecundity in ovulation induction cycles: effect of clomiphene citrate alone and with human menopausal gonadotropin. Fertil Steril 1993; 59(4): 756-60.
  28. DiMarzo SJ, Kennedy JF, Young PE, Hebert SA, Rosenberg DC, Villanueva B. Effect of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166: 1607-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(92)91549-P
  29. Dodson WC, Whitesides DB, Hughes CL Jr, Easley HA 3rd, Haney AF. Superovulation with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility: a possible alternative to gamete intrafallopian transfer and in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1987; 48: 441-5.
  30. Corsan GH, Kemmann E. The role of superovulation with menotropins in ovulatory infertility: a review. Fertil Steril 1991; 55: 468-77.
  31. Guzick DS, Carson SA, Coutifaris C, Overstreet JW, Factor-Litvak P, Steinkam pf MP, et al. Efficacy of superovulation and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 177-83. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199901213400302
  32. Dhaliwal LK, Sialy RK, Gopalan S, Majumdar S. Minimal stimulation protocol for use with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2002; 28(6): 295-9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1341-8076.2002.00058.x
  33. Gerli S, Gholami H, Manna A, Scotto Di Prega A, Vitiello C, Unfer V. Use of ethinyl estradiol to reverse the antiestrogenic effects of clomiphene citrate in patients undergoing intrauterine insemination: a comparative randomized study. Fertil Steril 2000; 73: 85-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00447-1
  34. Ransom MX, Doughman NC, Garcia AJ. Menotropins alone are superior to a clomiphene citrate and menotropin combination for superovulation induction among clomiphene citrate failures. Fertil Steril 1996; 65: 1169-74.
  35. Marinko M Biljan, Neal G Mahutte, Togas Tulandi, Seang Lin Tan. Prospective randomized double-blind trial of the correlation between time of administration and antiestrogenic effects of clomiphene citrate on reproductive end organs. Fertil Steril 1999; 71(4): 6333-8.
  36. Kupesic S, Kurjak A. Uterine and ovarian perfusion during the periovulatory period assessed by transvaginal color Doppler. Fertil Steril 1993; 60: 439-43.
  37. Quingley MM, Schmidt CL, Beauchamp PJ, Maklad NF, Berkowitz AS,Wolf DP. Preliminary experience with a combination of clomiphene and variable dosages of menopausal gonadotropins for enhanced follicular recruitment. Journal of In Vitro Fertilization and Embrio Transfer 1985; 2: 11-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01130826
  38. 김석현, 지병철, 노경록, 이재학, 이용찬, 문신용, 이진용. 불임증 치료를 위한 자궁강내 인공수정에 관한 연구. 대한산부회지 1996; 39: 1286-99.