Orbital Wall Reconstruction with Resorbable Polymeric Mesh

망상 흡수성 중합체를 이용한 안와벽 재건술

Kim, Jin-Il;Park, Eun-Su;Tak, Min-Seong;Jeong, Seong-Gyun;Kim, Yong-Bae
김진일;박은수;탁민성;정성균;김용배

  • Published : 20040000

Abstract

The goals of reconstruction of orbital blowout fracture are to restore continuity, to provide support of orbital contents and to prevent functional and anatomic defects. Various materials such as autogenous and alloplastic implants have been used to reconstruct the defect of orbital wall fracture. Autogenous implants such as bone and cartilage have the advantages of excellent biocompatibility and low rates of infection. On the other hand, they have the disadvantage of donor site morbidity. Alloplastic implants have potential risk of tissue inflammation and migration within orbit or anterior to the skin although they are easy to use without any disadvantages of donor site morbidity. To cover these disadvantages of various materials, we used the resorbable materials in mesh form(Biosorb FX(R)) in orbital wall reconstruction. Seventeen patients with blowout fracture defect were operated with 0.8mm thickness resorbable material in mesh form and fourteen of them were followed-up (Minimum, 9 months; maximum, 30 months). The results were satisfactory in most cases. Some of them showed minor problems for a short time; One patient had persistent 2mm enophthalmos, but no further surgical correction was required. Transient diplopia in four patients disappeared in two weeks. Lower eyelid swelling in two patients lasted for more than two weeks, but no inflammation, migration or extrusion of implants were observed. Resorbable materials allow initial sufficient stability and are gradually resorbed through the physiologic process. So no permanent implants that might affect facial growth, create interference with radiologic imaging, or be susceptible to infection and extrusion remain. Resorbable mesh plates we used are made of copolymers of Dextro(D)-polylactic acid and Levo(L)-polylactic in 30: 70 ratio. They were well tolerated by tissue, giving adequate support to healing of bone defect. During the follow-up period(mean 14 months), no significant problems were observed.

Keywords

References

  1. Eppley BL, Sadove AM, Havlik RJ: Resorbable plate fixation in pediatric craniofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 100: 1, 1997
  2. Pensler JM: The role of resorbable plates and screws in craniofacial surgery. J Craniofac Surg 8: 129, 1997
  3. Tharanon W, Sinn DP, Hobar PC, Sklar FH, Salomon J: Surgical outcomes using bioabsorbable plate systems in pediatric craniofacial surgery. J Craniofac Surg 9: 441, 1998
  4. Goldstein JA, Quereshy FA, Cohen AR: Early experience with biodegradable fixation for congenital pediatric craniofacial surgery. J Craniofac Surg 8: 110, 1997
  5. Hollier LH, Berzin E, Stal S, Rogers N: Resorbable mesh in the treatment of orbital floor fracture. J Craniofac Surg 12: 242, 2001
  6. Jordan DR, St. Onge P, Anderson RL, Patriently JR, Nerad JA: Complication associated with alloplastic implants used in orbital fracture repair. Ophthalmology 99: 1600, 1992
  7. Surronen R, Hares PE, Lindqvist C, Sailer HF: Update on bioresorbable plates in maxillofacial surgery. Facial Plast Surg 15: 63, 1999
  8. Habal MB: Absorbable, invisible, and flexible plating system for the craniofacial skeleton. J Craniofac Surg 8: 121, 1997
  9. Ashammakhi N, Peltoniemi H, Waris E, Suuronen R, Serlo W, Kellomaki M, Tormala P, Waris T: Developments in craniomaxillofacial surgery: use of self-reinforced bioabsorbable devices. Plast Reconstr Surg 108: 167, 2001
  10. Kumar AV, Staffenberg DA, Petronio JA, Wood RJ: Bioabsorbable plates and screws in pediatric craniofacial surgery: a review of 22 cases. J Craniofac Surg 8: 97, 1997