Journal of Preventive Veterinary Medicine

The Korean Society of Preventive Veterinary Medicine (한국예방수의학회)
권호 표지

Effect of Probiotics on Production and Improvement of Environment in Pigs and Broilers

백년초 혼합 생균제를 이용한 돼지 및 육계에서의 생산성 향상과 환경개선 효과

Ra , Jeong-Chan;Han, Hae-Jung;Song, Ji-Eun
라정찬;한혜정;송지은

  • Published : 20040000
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the effects of a mixture of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillusparacasei, Bifidobacterium longum, Bacillus subtilis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Opuntia ficus-indica var.saboten (DeOS) on the production performance and reduction of ammonia and $H_{2}S$ gas in pigs and broilers.60 Duroc Landrace Yorkshire growing pigs were used to evaluate the efficacy of DeOS at dietary concentrationof 0.1% and 0.2%. In group A(0.1% DeOS) and group B(0.2% DeOS), growth rate and feed efficiency were higherthan that of contro1(P<0.05). In aspect of environmental effect, DeOS supplementation reduced hydrogen sulfide andammonia gas in pig farm. Hydrogen sulfide was reduced from 200 ppm to 50 ppm for 6 weeks. In case of ammoniagas the concentration was reduced from 30 ppm to 10 ppm at the end of experiment.A total of 90 l-day old Arbor Acres was used and the chicks were assigned randomly into three groups with30 chicks per DeOS treatment group. The DeOS was administrated into basal diet, at levels of 0.05(group A) and0.1(group B)%. There was a significant difference of growth rate, feed intake and feed efficiency comparingcontro1(.P<0.05). In Satmonella gallinarium(SG) challenge test, death rate of control group was 40% and that of 0.1%DeOS treatment group was 13.3%.Weight gain and feed conversion ratio of chicks fed a mixture of DeOS were significantly higher than basal dietin overall period(P<0.05). Fecal ammonia gas generation was significantly decreased in both treatmentgroups(p<0.05). Moisture contents of bedding were also significantly decreased in groups A and B.In conclusion, supplementation of DeOS to pigs and chicks had a positive effect on enhancing good conditionof intestine, Production performance and reduction of harmful gas.

Keywords

References

  1. Otto, ER, Yokoyama, M, Hengemuehle, S, Von Bermuth, RD, Van Kempen, T, Trottier, NL: Am-monia, volatile fatty acids, Phenolics, and odor offen-siveness in manure from growing pigs fed diets re-duced in protein concentration. J. Anim. Sci., 81(7), 1754-1763, 2003
  2. Zahn, JA, DiSpirito, AA, Do, YS, Brooks, BE, Cooper, EE, Hatfield, JL: Correlation of human olfactory res-ponses to airbome concentrations of malodorous VOla-tile organic compounds emitted from swine effluent. Journal of Environmental Quality, 30, 624-634. 2001 https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2001.302624x
  3. Merrill, L, Halverson, LJ: Seasonal vahation in microbial communities and organic Malodor indi-cator compound concentrations in various types of swine manure storage systems; J. Environ. Qual., 31, 2074-2085, 2002 https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2002.2074
  4. 양돈 시설과 환기, 통진청 축산기술연구소, 발간 등록번호 11-1390271-000138-01
  5. Essen, SV, Donham, KJ: Illness and injury in animal confinement workers. Occupational Medicine, 14(2), 337-350, 1999
  6. Honham, Kelly J: Health effects from work in swine confinement buildings. American Journat of Mdicine, 17, 17-25, 1990
  7. K.ullman, GJ, Throne, PS, Marx, JJ: Qrganic dust exposures from work in dairy bams, American Indu-strial Hygiene Association Journal, 59, 403-412, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1080/15428119891010668
  8. Watkins, BA, Kratzer, FH: Effect of oral dosing of Lactobacillus strains on gut colonization and liver-biotin in broiler chicks. Poultry Sci., 62, 1983
  9. Maiolino, R, Fioretti, A, Menna, LF, Meo, C:Research on the effciency of probiotics in diets for broiler chickens. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews Series, B62, 482, 1992
  10. Barefoot, SF, Klaenhammer, TB: Detection and activity of lactacin B, a bacteriocin produced by Loctobacillus acidophilus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 45(6), 1808-1815, 1983
  11. Bezkorovainy, A: Probiotics, Determinants and sur-vival growth in the gut. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 73, 399S-405S, 2001
  12. Miller, DN, Varel, VH: Swine manure composition affects the biochemical origins, composition and accu-mulation of odorous compound, J. Anim. Sci., 81, 2131-213, 2003
  13. Jin, LZ, Ho, YW, Abdulah, N, Ali, AM, Jalaludin, S: Effects of adherent Lactobacillus cultures on growth, weight og organs and intestinal microflora and vola-tile fatty acids in broilers. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technot., 70, 197-209, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00080-1
  14. Lyons, TP: probiotics: an alternative to antibiotics.Pig News Info., 8, 157-164, 1987
  15. Dantzer, R, Kelly, KW: Stress and immunity: An integrated view of relationships between the brain and the immune system. Life Sci., 44, 1995-2008, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3205(89)90345-7
  16. Lawrence, TLJ: Growth in Animals. Butterworths London, 1980
  17. Moberg, GP: ed, Animal stress. American Physiol Soc, Bethesda MD., 1985
  18. National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th edn. National Academic Press. Washing-ton, DC. 1995
  19. Han, IK, Lee, SC, Lee, JH, Lee, KK, Lee, JC: Stu-dies on the growth promoting effects of probiotics: 1. The effects of Lactobacillus sporegenes on the grow-ing performance and the changes in microbial flora of the feces and intestinal contents of the broiler chicks. Korean J. Anim. Sci., 26, 150-157, 1984
  20. Mohan-Kumar, OR, Christopher, KJ: The role of Lactobacillus sporegenes (Probiotic) as feed additive. Poultry Guide, 25, 37-40, 1988
  21. Kalbande, VH, Gaffar, MA, Deshmurh, SV: EfFect of probiotic and nitrofurin on performance of growingcommercial pullets, Indian J. Poultry Sci., 27, 116-117, 1993
  22. Chiang, SH, Hsieh, WH: Effect of direct-fed micro-organisms on broiler growth performance and litter ammonia level. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science, 8, 159-162, 1995
  23. Reece, FN, Lott, BD, Deaton, JW: Ammonia in the atmosphere during brooding affects performance of broiler chickens. Poultry Sci., 59, 486-488, 1980 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0590486
  24. Caveny, DD, Quarles, CL Greathous, GA: Atmos-pheric ammonia and broiler cockerel performance. Poultry Sci., 60, 513-516, 1981 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0600513
  25. Attar, AJ, Brake, J: An economic analysis of the effects of ammonia and its control in broiler houses. Poultry Sci., 68(Supp11.1), 167(Abstract), 1989
  26. Jin, LZ, Ho, YW, Abdullah, N, Jalaludin, S: In-fluence of dried Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacilli cul-tures on intestinal microflora and performance in broilers. Asian-Australasian J. Anim, Aci., 9, 397-404, 1996a
  27. Burkett, RF, Thayer, RH, Morrison, RD: Supple-menting market bloiler rations with Lactobacillus and live yeast culture. In: Animal Science Agricultural Research Report. Oklahoma State University and USDA, USA, 1977
  28. Fuller, R: The importance of lactobacilli in main-taining normal microbial balance in the corp. Br. Poultry Sci., 18, 85-94, 1977 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071667708416332
  29. Fuller, R : Probiotics in man and animals. J. Appl. Bacteriol, 66, 365-378, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1989.tb05105.x
  30. Isshiki, Y, Tanaka, H, Toda, H, Nakahiro, Y: Effect of Lactobacilli in the diet on the growth rate and the digestion of feed in chickens. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. Series, B 51, 698, 1980
  31. Jin, LZ, Ho, YW, Ali, AM, Abdullah, N, Ong, BK, Jalaludin, S: Adhesion of Lactobacillus isolates to intestinal epithelial cells of chicken. Leu. Appl. Microbiol., 22. 229-232. 1996b https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.1996.tb01149.x
  32. Kim, CJ, Namkung, H, An, MS, Park, IK: Supple-mentation of probiotics to the broiler diets containing moldy corn. Korean J. Anim. Sci., 30, 542-548, 1988
  33. Kim, SH, Kwon, NH, Kim, JY, Lim, JY, Bae, WK, Kim, JM, Noh, KM, Hur, J, Jung, WK, Park, KT, Lee, JE, Ra, JC, Park, YH: Antimicrobial activity of natural product made by Opuntia ficus-indica var. saboten againstSalmonella spp. and Escherichia coli 0157: H7. J. Fd Hye. Safety, 17(2), 71-78, 2002
  34. McCroy, DF, Hobbs, PJ: Additives to reduce am-monia and odor emmisions from livestock wastes: A review. J. Environ, Qual, 30, 345-355, 2001 https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2001.302345x
  35. Nahashon, SN, Nakaue, HS, Mirosh, LW: Production variables and nutrient retention in single comb White Leghorn laying pullets fed diets supplemented with direct-fed microbials. Poultry Sci., 73(11), 1699-711, 1994a https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0731699
  36. Nahashon, SN, Nakaue, HS, Snyder, SP, Mirosh, LW: Performance of Single Comb White Leghom layers fed com-soybean meal and barley-com-soybean meal diets supplemented with a direct fed microbial. Poultry Sci., 73, 1712-1723, 1994b https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0731712
  37. Regnier, JA, Kelley, KW: Heat-and cold stress sup-presses in vivo and in vitro cellular immune res-ponses of chickens. Am. J. Vet. Res., 42, 294-299, 1981
  38. SAS Institute, SAS/STATU User's Guide. Release 6.12. Edition. SAS Institute Inc Cary NC USA. 1996
  39. Tortuero, F, Femandez, E: Effects of inclusion of microbial cultures in barley-based diets fed to laying hens. Anim Feed TechnoI., 53, 255-265, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)00747-W
  40. Watkins, BA, Kratzer, FH: Drinking water treatment with commercial preparation of a concentrated Lacto-bacillus culture for broiler chicken. Poultry Sci., 63,2088-2094, 1984
  41. Woestyne, MV, Verstraete, W: Biotechnology in the treatment of animal manure, 311-327. In Biotech-notogy in animal feeds and animal eeding. VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Weinhiem, Germany, 1995