The Korean Journal of Physical Education (한국체육학회지)

Korean Alliance for Health: Physical Education: Recreation:and Dance (한국체육학회)
권호 표지

Development and Validation of the Korean Version of the Leisure Satisfaction Scale (LSS)

한국형 여가만족척도 개발과 타당화 검증

Kim, Young-Jae
김영재

  • Published : 20040000
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to develop a new Korean version of the leisure satisfaction scale by modifying the one originally proposed by Beard and Ragheb(1980). In order to reflect culture difference, this study was focused on process of translation. Namely 3 time - translation course have enforced(first translation, reverse translation, commitment translation). Statistical procedures included descriptive statistic, factor analysis, internal consistency. Cronbach's Alpha was calculated to test the reliability of items and their internal consistency. Exploratory Factor Analysis(EFA) was conducted to test the structure of each factors with principal analysis and varimax rotation. Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA) was conducted to test the factor validity of this inventory with LISREL 8.14 for windows. The results were appeared as follows, the Korean version of the leisure satisfaction scale was consisted 5 factors(social, emotion, physical, surrounding, education) and 24 items. After the results of confirmatory factor analysis, on the whole the index values was appeared fit. Suggestions for use of the Korean version of the leisure satisfaction scale and for further research are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. 김계수 (2002). AMOS구조방정식 모형. 서울: 고려정보산업
  2. 강경빈 (1998). 대학생 여가활동참여와 대학만족, 여가만족, 생활만족간의 관계. 미간행박사학위논문. 전남대학교 대학원
  3. 김병준 (1998). 스포츠심리학에서 비교문화 연구전략. 한국스포츠심리학회지, 9, 63-82
  4. 김병준 (2003). 체육학 연구에서 질문지 번역과 타당도 제고를 위한 절차. 한국스포츠심리학회지, 14, 1, 13-26
  5. 김희선, 허현미 (2002). 레저스포츠 소비자의 참가 종목별 여가행동에 관한 연구. 한국스포츠사회학회지, 15, 1, 215-229
  6. 류호상 (2000). 운동강도가 상태불안에 미치는 영향. 한국스포츠 심리학회지, 11, 2, 123-132
  7. 민경선, 김진 (2001). 배드민턴 참여유형에 따른 여가만족도에 관한 연구. 한국사회체육학회지, 15, 363-372
  8. 오수학, 김병준 (2002). 심리측정도구의 타당도에 관한 새로운 개념과 검증방법. 한국스포츠심리학회, 13, 3, 111-127
  9. 유진 (2003). 스포츠심리학 연구의 이론적 패러다임 탐색. 한국스포츠심리학회, 14, 4, 223-236
  10. 윤영길, 정청희 (1999). 고교․대학 축구선수의 운동스트레스 척도 개발. 99 한국스포츠심리학회 춘계 학술발표회 논문집, 17-45
  11. 이종길 (1992). 사회체육활동과 생활만족의 관계. 미간행 박사학위논문. 서울대학교 대학원
  12. 임번장 (1993). 생활체육개론. 서울대학교 체육연구소, 3
  13. 정용각 (1998). 여가운동 참가자의 스포츠 참여동기와 정서의 관계. 외대논총, 19, 413-430
  14. 정용각 (2000). 여가운동 참가자 성격의 Big-5 요인과 정서의 관계분석. 한국체육학회지. 39, 4, 265-275
  15. 채환국, 김석기 (2003). 가정주부의 정보이용도와 여가장원에 따른 여가활동 참여유형과 여가만족도. 한국체육학회, 42, 5, 451-460
  16. 한덕웅, 강혜자 (2000). 한국어 정서 용어들의 적절성과 경험 빈도. 한국심리학회지:일반, 19, 2, 63-99
  17. 허명회 (1999). 사회과학을 위한 다변량 자료분석. 서울: 자유아카데미
  18. Beard, J. G & Ragheb, M. G. (1980). Measuring leisure satisfaction, Journal of Leisure Research, 12, 20-33
  19. Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Methodology(Vol. 2, pp. 389-444). Boston: Allyn & Bacon
  20. Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
  21. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1979). The quality of american life. New York: Russel saga Foundation
  22. Chubb, M., & Chubb, H. R. (1981). One third of our time?, New York: John wilcy and Sons. Inc
  23. Csikszenmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass
  24. Duda, J. L., & Allison, M. T. (1990). Cross-cultural analysis in exercise and sport psychology: A void in the field. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 12, 114-131
  25. Rejeski, W. J., Brawley, L. R., & Shumaker, S. A. (1996). Physical activity and health-related quality of life. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 24, 71-108
  26. Riddick, C. (1985). Leisure satisfaction determinants of older males and females. Leisure Science, 7 47-63 https://doi.org/10.1080/01490408509512107
  27. Schooler, C. (1996). Cultural and social-cultural explanations of cross-national psychological differences. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 323-349 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.323
  28. Wright, M., Bee, J. S. (1980). User manual for the conventional item analysis program version 3.20, MicroCAT and ITEMAN assessment system Corporation Inc