Job Stress, Heart Rate Variability and Metabolic Syndrome

직무스트레스, 심박동수 변이 및 대사증후군

Chang, Sei-Jin;Koh, Sang-Baek;Choi, Hong-Ryul;Woo, Jong-Min;Cha, Bong-Suk;Park, Jong-Ku;Chen, Yong-Hee;Chung, Ho-Keun
장세진;고상백;최홍열;우종민;차봉선;박종구;천용희;정호근

  • Published : 20040300

Abstract

Objective: A growing body of literature has documented that job stress is associated with the development of cardiovascular disease. Nevertheless, the pathophysiological mechanism of thisassociation remains unclear. Therefore, we tried to elucidate the relationship between job stress, heart rate variability and metabolic syndrome. Method: The study design was cross-sectional, and 169 industrial workers were recruited. A structured-questionnaire was used to assess the general characteristics and job characteristics (work demand, decision latitude). Heart rate variability (HRV) was recorded using SA-2000 (medi-core). HRV was assessed by time-domain and by frequency-domain analyses. Time domain analysis was performed for SDNN (Standard Deviation of NN interval), and spectral analysis for low-frequency (LF), high-frequency (HF) and total frequency power. Metabolic syndrome was defined on the basis of clustering of risk factors, when three or more of the following cardiovascular risk factors were included in the fifth quintile: glucose, systolic blood pressure, HDL-cholesterol (bottom quintile), triglyceride and waist-hip ratio. Results: The results showed that job characteristics were not associated with cardiovascular risk factors. The high strain group had a less favorable cardiovascular risk profile with higher levels of blood pressure, glucose, homocysteine, and clotting factor than the lower strain group (low strain+passive+active group), but the difference was not statistically significant. The SDNN of HRV was significantly lower in the high strain group than in the low strain group. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome in the low strain, passive, active and high strain groups was 9.7%, 13.9%, 14.9% and 23.8%, respectively. In the high strain group, the metabolic syndrome was significantly related to a decreased SDNN. However, we could not find a significant association in LF/HF ratio. Conclusion: This result suggests that decreased HRV does not play a role in the development of disease; however, it can induce cardiovascular abnormalities or dysfunctions related to the onset of heart disease among high risk groups.

목적: 이 연구는 Karasek의 직업성 긴장 모델에 따라 직무스트레스에 따른 심박동수 변이의 차이를 알아보았으며, 직업성 긴장 수준을 대사증후군에 따라 층화하여 심박동수 변이의 관련성을 알아보고자 하였다. 방법: 이 연구는 영남지역에 위치한 일개 제조업체를 대상으로 2003년 8월 1일부터 10월 30일 까지 종합건강진단에 참여한 40세 이후의 남자 근로자들을 연구대상으로 하였다. 연구대상자는 169명이었고, 구조화된 설문지를 이용하여 사회인구학적 변수, 직업적 특성 등을 조사하였다. 심박동수 변이 측정은 SA-2000E (medi-core를 ) 이용하였고, 크게 시간 영역과 주파수 영역으로 나누어 분석하였다. 시간영역 분석 지표로 S D N N을 사용하였고, 주파수 범위지표들은 LF, HF 및 total power 등을 사용하였다. 대사증후군은 수축기 혈압, 혈당, 중성지방, 고밀도(HDL)콜레스테롤, 허리-엉덩이 둘레비 중세가지 이상이 위험도가 높은 상위 5분위 수에 포함될 경우로 정의하였다. 결과: 직업적 특성에 따른 심혈관계 위험요인의 차이를 알아본 결과, 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이는 변수는 없었다. 직업성 긴장수준에 따른 위험인자의 분포는 다른 집단에 비해 고긴장집단이 혈당, 호모시스테인, 혈액응고인자, 혈압 등이 높았으나 통계적으로 유의하지 않았고, 이완기 혈압은 고긴장집단이 가장 높았으며 경계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다. 심박동수 변이는 고긴장 집단에서 SDNN이 유의한 감소를 보였고, 주파수 영역의 분석지표는 감소하였으나 유의하지 않았다. 직업성긴장수준의 경우 대사증후군은 저긴장, 수동적, 활동적 및 고긴장 집단이 각각 9.7%, 13.9%, 14.9%, 23.8%로 고긴장집단의 경우 저긴장집단에 비해 교차비 2.92로 높았으나 95% 신뢰구간 0.73~11.67로 유의하지 않았다. 직업성 긴장 수준을 대사증후군 여부로 층화하여 심박동수 변이의 차이를 알아보았다. 그 결과 저긴장집단 정상군에 비해 고긴장집단 대사증후군이 있는 위험군에서 심박동수 변이 SDNN이 통계적으로 유의하게 감소하였다. 주파수 분석영역 지표에서는 LF/HF 비가 높아 자율신경계가 과반응을 보이는 것을 시사하였으나 통계적으로 유의하지는 않았다. 결론: 고긴장집단에서의 심박동수의 변이 감소는 질병의 직접적인 지표라고 말할 수는 없으나, 심박동수 변이는 심혈관계의 기능장애를 유발하거나 위험신호로 받아들일수 있다고 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. 장세진 등. 우리나라 직장인들의 스트레스 수준의 파악, 스트레스 감소프로그램의 개발 및 인프라 구축에 관한 연구. 보건복지부. 2001
  2. 차봉석, 고상백, 장세진. 직업적 특성, 사회심리적 스트레스 및 호모시스테인의 관련성. 예방 의학회지 1998;31(4):719-27.
  3. Alfthan G, Pekkanen J, Jauhiainen M. Relation of serum homocysteine and liporotein(a) concentration to atherosclerotic disease in a prospective Finnish population based study. Athrosclerosis 1994;106:9-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9150(94)90078-7
  4. Belkic K. Evidence for mediating econeurocardiologic mechanisms. Occupational Medicine State of the Art Reviews 2000;15(1):117-62.
  5. Bosner MS, Kleiger RE. Heart rate variability and risk stratification after myocardial infarction. In: Malik M, Camm AJ (eds.): Heart Rate Variability. Armonk, NY. Futura Publishing Co., 1995.
  6. Brunner EJ, Marmot MG, Nanchahal K, Shipley MJ, Stansfeld SA, Juneia M, Alberti KGM. Social inequality in coronary risk; central obesity and the metabolic syndrom. Evidence from the Whithehall II study. Diabetoiogia 1997;40;1341-9.
  7. Chang SJ, Koh SB, Cha BS, Park JK. Job characteristics and blood coagulation factors in Korean male workers. JOEM 2002;44(11);997-1002.
  8. Cooper CL, and Davison M. Sources of stress at work and their relation to stressors in nonworking envioronments. in Kalimo R, El-Batawi MA, and Cooper CL(eds.) Psychological Factors at Work. WHO, 1987. 99-111.
  9. Davey Smith G, Neaten JD, Wentworth D, Stamler R, Stamler J. Socioeconomic differentials in motality risk among men screened for the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial I. White men. Am J Public Health 1996;86;486-96.
  10. Dishman RK, Nakamura Y, Garcia ME, Thompson RW, Dunn AL, Blair SN. Heart rate variability, trait anxiety, and percived stress among physically fit men and women. Int J Psychophysiol 2000;37;121-33.
  11. Frey B, Binder T, Teufelsbauser H. Heart rate variability and patient outcome in advanced bean failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21;286.
  12. Frimerman A, Miller HI, Laniado S, keren G. Changes in hemostatic function at times of cyclic variation in occupational stress. Am J Cardiolology 1997;79:72-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(96)00680-7
  13. Gardell B, Aronsson G, Barklof K. The working environment for local public transport personnel. Stockholm, The Swedish Work Environmental Fund. 1983.
  14. Green KL, Johnson JV. The effects of psychosocial work organization on pattern s of cigarette smorking among male chemical plant employee. Am J Public Health 1990;80:1368-71. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.80.11.1368
  15. Harlan WR, Manolio TA. Factors Associated with thrombosis and thrombolysis. In: Eliott P(eds) Coronary heart disease epidemiology. Oxford University Press. Oxpord. 1992, pp 120-1.
  16. Ishizaki M, Tsuritani I, Noborisaka Y, Yamada Y, Tabata M, Nakagawa H. Relationship between job stress and plasma fibrinolytic activity in male Japanese workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1996;68:315-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00409416
  17. Kageyama T, Nishikido N, Kobayashi T, Kurokawa Y, Kaneko T, Kabuto M. Long commuting time, extensive over time, and sympathodominant state assessed in terms of shortterm heart rate variability among male white collar workers in the Tokyo megalopolis. Industrial Health 1998;36;209-17.
  18. Karasek RA, Theorell T, Schwartz JE, Schnall PL, Piper CF, Michcla JL. Job characteristics in relation to the prevalence of myocardial infarction in the US health examination survey(HES) and the health and nutrition examination survey (HANES). Am J Public Health 1988;78:910-8. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.78.8.910
  19. Kleiger RE, Miller JP, Bigger JT, Moss AJ. Decreased heart rate variability and its association with mortality after myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1987;113;256-62.
  20. Krantz DS, Manuck SB. Acute psychophysiological reactivity and risk of cardiovascular disease; a review and methodological critique. Psychol Bull 1984;96:435-64.
  21. Lolin YI, Sanderson JE, Cheng SK, Chan CF, Pand CP, Woo KS, Masarei JRL. Hyperhomocysteinemia and premature coronary artery disease in the Chinese. Heart 1996;76:117-22. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.76.2.117
  22. Manuck SB, Kaplan JR, Matthews KA. Behavioral antecedents of coronary heart disease and atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 1986;6:2-14.
  23. McEwen BS. Protective and damagings effects of stress mediators. NEJM 1998;338;171-9.
  24. Pieper C, LacCroix AZ, Karasek RA. The relation of psychological demansions of work with coronary heart disease risk factors: a meta-analysis of five United States data bases. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129:483-94. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115159
  25. Podrid PJ, Fuchs T, Candians R. Role of the sympathetic nervous system in the genensis of ventricular arrhythmia. Circulation 1990;82(S1);103-10.
  26. Reaven GM. Role of insulin resistance in human disease(syndrome X): an expanded definition. Ann Rev Med 1993;44;121-31.
  27. Rich MW, Saini JS, Kleiger RE, Carney RM, Freedland KE. Correlation of heart rate variability with clinical and angiographic variables and late mortality after coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 1998;62;714-7.
  28. Rozanski A, Bairey CN, Krantz DS. Mental stress and the induction of silent myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease. N Eng J Med 1988;318:1005-13. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198804213181601
  29. Schnall PL, Schwartz JE, Landsbergis PA, Warren K, Pickering TG. Relation between job strain, alcohol, and ambulatory blood pressure. Hypertension 1992;19:488-94. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.19.5.488
  30. Schulte PA. A conceptual and historical framework for molecular epidemiology. Schelte PA, Perera FP(eds), Molecular epidemiology principle and practices. Academic Press 1993;4-36.
  31. Seward JP. Occupational stress. In LaDon J(ed.) Occupational Medicine. Prentice-Hall inc. 1990.pp 467-80.
  32. Task Force of The European Society of Cardiology and The North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Heart rate variability standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. European Heart Journal 1996;17;354-81.
  33. Theorell T, Ahlberg-Hulten G, Jodko M, Sigala F, de la Torre B. Influence of job strain and emotion on blood pressure in female hospital personnel during workhours. Scand J Work Environ Health 1993;19:313-8. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1469
  34. Thoits PA. Dimensions of life events that influence psychological distress: an evaluation and synthesis of the literature. in Kaplan (ed.). Psychological Stress: Trends in Theory and Research. New York: Academic Press, 1983. pp. 33-103 .
  35. van Amelsvoort LGPM, Schouten EG, Maan AC, Swenne CA, Kok FJ. Occupational determinants of heart rate variability. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2000;73;255-62.
  36. Vrijkotte TGM, van Doornen LJP, de Geus EJC. Effects of work stress on ambulatory blood pressure, heart rate, and heart rate variability. Hypertension 2000;35:880-6. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.35.4.880
  37. Wolf S. The environment-brain-heart connection: econeurocardiology. Occupational Medicine State of the Art Reviews 2000;15(1):107-9.