Korean journal of medical education

The Korean Society of Medical Education (한국의학교육학회)
권호 표지

일개 의과대학 임상실습 교육과정 평가

Park, Ju-Hyeon;Kim, Seon
박주현;김선

  • Published : 20040000
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to present the results of a clerkship evaluation done through a student questionnaire, to provide appropriate feedback to faculty, and to make constructive suggestions for improving the educational experience during clerkship. Methods: The evaluation was conducted in 2003 at The College of Medicine at Catholic University. 61 fourth-year medical students who had finished their clerkship rotations completed the given questionnaire. This questionnaire was composed of items covering 8 dimensions related to: overall assessment of the clerkship, problems in clerkship contents and methods, the evaluation process, the best preceptor and the characteristics of the best clinical faculty, the most useful educational activities and constraining activities, and areas to be improved. Results: Most of the students gave a negative evaluation to the overall clerkship. The most serious problems were the high number of activities irrelevant to the clerkship and the lack of opportunity for direct participation. The most useful educational activities were: 1) case presentation on assigned patients, 2) ‘mini lectures' provided during ward rounds, 3) assigned patient care as a team, and 4) performing clinical skills under faculty supervision. The most constraining activities were: 1) difficulty interacting with patients as a student, 2) inefficient time management, and 3) unsystematic clinical clerkship schedule. Conclusion: In conclusion, the most fundamental problem in clinical teaching was the lack of support and incentives for clinical teachers. Not only training sessions for faculty and residents but also financial rewards or promotion opportunities need to be provided for a better quality clinical clerkship.

Keywords

References

  1. 김경한(2003). 마취통증의학과 임상실습은 지식, 수기, 태도 영역에서 고르게 평가되고 있는가? 한국의학교육, 15(3), 213-220
  2. 김기황(1998). 진단방사선과 교육과정에 관한 연구. 1998년 대학방사선의학과 숙제보고
  3. 김 선(2003). 의과대학 임상실습교육의 개선방향. 가톨릭대학 의학부 문리논총, 18, 78-87
  4. 김영진, 최진수, 황태주(1995). 의과대학생의 임상실습제도 개선에 관한 연구. 한국의학교육, 7(2), 169-175
  5. 김용일(2001). 임상실습 교육계획 수립 워크숍 자료집(유인물). 인천:가천의과대학
  6. 박귀화, 이영돈, 오재환, 최인석, 임윤명, 김용일(2003). 진료참여형 임상실습 교육과정의 개발 -학생인턴제의 실습 범위와 수준을 중심으로 -. 한국의학교육, 15(2), 113-130
  7. 이영미, 소연희, 안덕선, 박승하(2002). 임상실습 교육과정 평가. 한국의학교육, 14(2), 293-300
  8. 장성호, 안덕선, 유세화, 김형규(1993). 의과대학 임상실습 개선에 관한 연구. 한국의학교육, 5(1), 34-40
  9. 전종휘(1989). 임상교육에서 고려되어야 할 사항들. 한국의학교육, 1(2), 1-3
  10. 채수진, 장기현, 강흥식, 김우선(2001). 설문지를 이용한 학생에 의한 실습수업평가. 한국의학교육, 13(1), 131-139
  11. Appel J, Friedman E, Fazio S, Kimmel J, Whelan A(2002). Educational Assessment Guidelines : A Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine Commentary. Association of Professors of Medicine, 113, 172-179
  12. Busari JO, Scherpbier AJJA, Van Der Vleuten CPM, Essed GE(2000). Residents' perception of their role in teaching undergraduate students in the clinical setting. Medical Teacher, 22(4), 348-353 https://doi.org/10.1080/014215900409438
  13. Busari JO, Prince KJAH, Scherpbier AJJA, Van der Vleuten CPM, Essed GGN(2002). How residents perceive their teaching role in the clinical setting: a qualitative study. Medical Teacher, 24(1), 57-61 https://doi.org/10.1080/00034980120103496
  14. Copeland HL, Hewson MG(2000). Developing and testing an instrument to measure the effectiveness of clinical teaching in an academic medical center. Acad med, 75(2), 161-166 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200002000-00015
  15. Elnicki DM, Kolarik R, Bardella I(2003). Third-Year Medical Students' Perception of Effective Teaching Behaviors in a Multidisciplinary Ambulatory Clerkship. Acad Med, 78(8), 815-819 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200308000-00016
  16. Gelula MH, Yudkowsky R(2003). Using standardized students in faculty development workshop to improve clinical teaching skills. Medical Education, 37, 621-629 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01556.x
  17. Kliminster SM,&Jolly BC(2000). Effective supervision in clinical practice settings : a literature review. Medical Education, 34, 827-840 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00758.x
  18. Parsell G &Bligh J(2001). Recent perspectives on clinical teaching. Medical Education, 35, 405-414
  19. Riesenberg LA, Biddle WB, Erney SL(2001). Medical student and faculty perceptions of desirable primary care teaching site characteristics. Medical Education, 35, 660-665 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00954.x
  20. Snell L, Tallett S, Haist S, Hays R, Norcini J, Prince K, Rothman A, Rowe R(2000). A review of the evaluation of clinical teaching : new perspectives and challenges Medical Education, 34, 862-870 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00754.x
  21. Stark P(2003). Teaching and learning in the clinical setting : a qualitative study of the perceptions of students and teachers. Medical Education, 37, 975-982 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01675.x
  22. Torre DL, Sebastian JL, Simpson DE(2003). Learning Activities and High-Quality Teaching : Perception of Third-Year IM Clerkship Students. Acad Med, 78(8), 812-814 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200308000-00015
  23. Ullian JA, Bland CJ, Simpson DE(1994). An alternative approach to defining the role of the clinical teacher. Acad Med, 69(10). 832-838 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199410000-00013
  24. Van der Hem-Stokroos HH, Scherpbier AJJA, Van der Vleuten CPM, De Vries H, Haarman HJThM.(2001) How effective is a clerkship as a learning environment? Medical Teacher, 23(6), 599-604 https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590127200
  25. Van der Hem-Stokroos HH, Daelmans HEM, Van der Vleuten CPM, Haarman HJ THM, Scherpbier AJJA(2003). A qualitative study of constructive clinical learning experiences. Medical Teacher, 25(2), 120-126 https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159031000092481