Comparison of the Academic Achievement by Self-Directed Learning Readiness Levels in a Hybrid Problem Based Learning Course

문제바탕학습을 적용한 통합교육 수업에서 자기주도학습 능력에 따른 학업성취도 비교

채수진;신좌섭;이윤성

  • Published : 20040000

Abstract

Purpose : The purpose of this study was (1) to compare the relationship between the multiple choice test (MCT) and problem based learning (PBL) achievement, and (2) to determine whether self-directed learning readiness (SDLR) factors had an influence on PBL achievement by SDLR levels in a hybrid PBL course. Methods : The subjects were 2nd year students (N=113) in the Hematology PBL course in Seoul National University, College of Medicine. For the study analysis, data were collected on PBL, MCT and SDLR scores. The SDLRS instrument consisted of 32 items and 6 factors. The SPSSwin(R) program was used to analyze the data and statistics such as correlation, F-test, and multiple regression analysis. Results : Firstly, the results showed a significant relationship between PBL and SDLR scores (r=.583; p<.05). Meanwhile, the relationships between MCT and PBL (r=.145), and between MCT and SDLR scores (r=-.067) were insignificant. Secondly, the PBL score by SDLR levels (high, middle, low) showed a statistically significant difference (F=15.98; p<.05). Thirdly, It was proved by multiple regression analysis that the SDLR factors and PBL score by SDLR levels were explained by the following three factors : love of learning (R^2=18.8{\%}; high level), self understanding (R^2=17.2{\%}; middle level), inquiry to learning (R^2=19.0{\%}; low level). Conclusion : The results of this study indicated that there was a significant correlation between PBL score and SDLR levels. It showed that the higher SDLR scores, the more successful in the independent situations such as PBL. Further study is needed so that suitable instructional methods for medical students can be conducted in integrated curriculum.

Keywords

References

  1. 박은경(2003). 의학교육에서의 문제중심학습에서 튜터의 역할에 관한 평가연구. 석사학위논문, 서울대학교 대학원
  2. 신좌섭, 이윤성(2000). 서울의대 통합교육 시행경험. 한국의학교육, 12(2), 271-287
  3. 심미자(2001). 자기주도적 학습의 이해, 서울:열린
  4. 유귀옥(1997). 성인학습자의 자기주도성과 인구학적 및 사회심리학적 변인 연구. 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
  5. 의학교육실(2001). 문제중심학습 안내서, 서울대학교 의학과대학 의학교육실
  6. 채수진, 신좌섭, 은희철, 이윤성(2002). 문제중심학습 수업에서의 성찰저널 활용에 대한 연구. 한국의학교육, 14(2), 157-164
  7. 채수진, 이동순, 이윤성(2003). 통합교육에서 문제바탕학습 시행의 문제점 및 그 원인과 개선방향. 한국의학교육, 15(1), 35-42
  8. 한국교육심리학회(2000), 교육심리학 용어사전, 서울: 학지사
  9. Grow GO(1991). Teaching learners to be self directed: A stage approach, Adult Education Quarterly, 41(3), 125-149 https://doi.org/10.1177/0001848191041003001
  10. Guglielmino LM. Guglielmino PJ(1991). Self-Directed Learning in business and industry An information age imperative. In H.B. Long & Associates, Self-Directed Learning: Application and Theory. Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia, Adult Education Department, 125-148
  11. Knowles MS(1975). Self-Directed Learning : A Guide for Learners and Teachers. NY: Association Press
  12. Weat RI & Bently EL(1990). Structural analysis of the self-directed learning readiness scale: A confirmatory factor analysis using modeling. In H.B. Long & Associates, Advances in research and practice in self directed learning.Norman:Oklahoma Research Center for Continuing Professional and Higher Education of the University of Oklahoma.