Relationship between Dry Eye Syndrome and Hormone Replacement Therapy in Postmenopausal Women

폐경기 여성에서 호르몬 대치요법과 안구 건조 증상과의 관계

Kim, Sung-Chul;Suh, Youn;Chung, Sung-Kun
김성철;서연;정성근

  • Published : 20040400

Abstract

Purpose: An investigation was carried out into the relationship between dry eye syndrome and hormone replacement therapy(HRT) in postmenopausal women Methods: A retrospective analysis was made of the symptomatic differences between 100 and 25 postmenopausal women suffering from dry eye symptoms who had either undergone, or not, HRT, respectively. Results: The average total time period of HRT in 57 of the patients was 41.4months, (ranging form 2 to 180 months) in 57 patients. 16 patients had received an estrogen only regimen, and 41 a combination therapy, consisting of both estrogen and progesterone. The Schirmer test results and the tear film break-up times(BUT) in these two groups were 7.29${\pm}$4.29 and 6.59${\pm}$4.64 mm, and 5.00${\pm}$2.47 and 4.95${\pm}$2.35 seconds, respectively. No significant difference in the results was found between the two groups. The Schirmer test and BUT results in the HRT patients averaged 6.75${\pm}$4.50 mm, and 4.95${\pm}$2.37 seconds, respectively. The results showed a statistically significant decrease (p<0.05) for the non-HRT patients, with Schirmer test and BUT results of 11.73${\pm}$7.09 mm, and 8.65${\pm}$4.50 seconds, respectively. Conclusions: The total time period and the type of HRT regimen had no influence on the severity of the dry eye symptoms in postmenopausal women. However, when compared to non-HRT patients, the degree of symptomatic manifestations showed statistically significant increases. Further observations and follow-up on these subjects should be pursued.

목적 : 폐경기 여성에서 호르몬 대치요법과 안구 건조 증상과의 관계에 대해 알아보았다. 대상과 방법 : 호르몬 대치요법을 받고 있는 폐경기 여성에서 안구 건조증으로 안과 외래를 방문한 환자 100명과 호르몬 대치요법을 받지 않는 폐경기 여성 25명에서 안구 건조 증상의 정도 차이 등을 후향적으로 비교 분석하였다. 결과 : 57명에서 호르몬 대치요법을 받은 총 기간은 평균 41.4개월이었으며, 에스트로겐 단독요법 16명, 에스트로겐과 프로게스테론 병합요법 41명으로 각각 쉬르머 검사는 평균 7.29${\pm}$4.29mm, 6.59${\pm}$4.64mm, 눈물막 파괴시간은 5.00${\pm}$2.47초, 4.95${\pm}$2.35초를 보였다. 이들은 모두 유의한 변화를 보이지 않았다. 호르몬 치료를 받고 있는 폐경기 여성의 쉬르머 검사는 평균 6.75${\pm}$4.50mm, 눈물막 파괴시간은 평균 4.95${\pm}$2.37초로, 호르몬 치료를 받지 않는 폐경기 여성의 11.73${\pm}$7.09mm, 8.65${\pm}$4.50초에 비해 통계적으로 유의하게 감소한 것으로 나타났다(p<0.05). 결론 : 호르몬 대치요법을 받고 있는 폐경기 여성들에서 호르몬 대치요법의 총 기간과 호르몬의 종류가 안구 건조 증상의 정도에는 영향을 미치지 않으나, 호르몬 대치요법을 받지 않는 폐경기 여성과 비교하면 안구 건조 증상의 발현 정도가 유의하게 증가함을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Evans V, Millar TJ, Eden JA, Willcox MD. Menopause, hormone replacement therapy and tear function. Adv Exp Med Biol 2002,506:1029-33.
  2. Pelit A, Bagis T, Kayaselcuk F, et al. Tear function tests and conjunctival impression cytology before and after hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women. Eur J Ophthalmol 2003;13:337-42. https://doi.org/10.1159/000075121
  3. Chia EM, Mitchell P, Rochtcina E, et al. Prevalence and associations of dry eye syndrome in an older population: The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Clin Experimental Ophthalmol 2003;31:229-32. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-9071.2003.00634.x
  4. Schaumberg DA, Buring JE, Sullivan DA, Dana MR. Hormone replacement therapy and dry eye syndrome. JAMA 2001;286:2114-9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.17.2114
  5. Meldrum DR, Davidson BJ, Tararyn IV, Judd HL. Change in circulating steroid with aging in postmenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol 1981;57:624-8.
  6. 김진홍. 폐경기 치료 WHY & HOW 해야 하나?, 1st ed. 서울: 도서 출판 원단, 2001;11-4.
  7. Guttridge NM. Change in ocular and visual variables during the menstrual cycle. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1994;14:38-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.1994.tb00555.x
  8. Wickham LA, Geo J, Toda I, et al. Identification of androgen, estrogen and progesterone receptor mRNAs in the eye. Acta Ophthalmol 2000;78:146-53. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0420.2000.078002146.x
  9. Vanley GT, Leopold IH, Gregg TH. Interpretation of tear film break-up. Arch Ophthalmol 1977;95:445-8. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1977.04450030087010
  10. Farris RL, Gilbard JP, Stuchell RN, Mandel ID. Diagnostic test in keratoconjunctivitis sicca. CLAOJ 1983;9:23-8.
  11. Lucca JA, Nunez JN, Farris RL. A comparison of diagnostic tests for keratoconjunctivitis sicca: lactoplate, Schirmer, and tear osmolarity. CLAOJ 1990;16:109-12.
  12. 고현주, 안정숙, 이성원. 안건조증 환자에서 안증상의 의의 및 환자에 대한 통계학적 고찰. 한안지 1990;31:571-7.
  13. 기창원, 노광국, 이진학. 건성안 진단시 Taer Film Break-up Time(BUT)값이 가지는 의의. 한안지 1985;26:1131-5.
  14. Mathers DA, Dolney AM, Kraemer D. The effect of hormone replacement therapy on the symptoms and physiologic parameters of dry eye. Adv Exp Med Biol 2002;506:1017-22.
  15. Lemp MA, Hamil JR. Factors affecting tear film break-up in normal eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 1973;89:1031-5.
  16. Sullivan DA, Sullivan BD, Evans JE, et al. Androgen Deficiency, Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, and Evaporative Dry Eye. Ann NY Acad Sci 2002;966:211-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04217.x
  17. Mathers WD, Stovall D, Lane JA, et al. Menopause and Tear Function: The Influence of Prolactin and Sex Hormones on Human Tear Production. Cornea 1998;17:353-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-199807000-00002
  18. Azzarolo AM, Bjerrum K, Maves CA, et al. Hypophysectomy induced regression of female rat lacrimal glands. Partial restoration/maintenance by dihydrotestosterone and prolactin. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995;36:216-26.