Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences

The Korean Space Science Society (한국우주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

OPTIMAL FORMATION TRAJECTORY-PLANNING USING PARAMETER OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUE

  • Published : 2004.09.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Some methods have been presented to get optimal formation trajectories in the step of configuration or reconfiguration, which subject to constraints of collision avoidance and final configuration. In this study, a method for optimal formation trajectory-planning is introduced in view of fuel/time minimization using parameter optimization technique which has not been applied to optimal trajectory-planning for satellite formation flying. New constraints of nonlinear equality are derived for final configuration and constraints of nonlinear inequality are used for collision avoidance. The final configuration constraints are that three or more satellites should be placed in an equilateral polygon of the circular horizontal plane orbit. Several examples are given to get optimal trajectories based on the parameter optimization problem which subjects to constraints of collision avoidance and final configuration. They show that the introduced method for trajectory-planning is well suited to trajectory design problems of formation flying missions.

Keywords

References

  1. Alfriend, K. T., Schaub, S., & Gim, D-W. 2000, 23rd Annual AAS Guidance and Control Conference, AAS 00-012
  2. Barraquand, J., Kavraki, L., Latombe, J. C., Motwani, R, Li, T. Y., & Raghavan, P. 1997, International Journal of Robotics Research, 16, 759 https://doi.org/10.1177/027836499701600604
  3. Beard, R. W., McLain, T. W., & Hadaegh, F. Y. 2000, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dyanmics, 23, 339 https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4528
  4. Clohessy, W. H., & Wiltshire, R. S. 1960, Journal of the Aerospace Sciences, 27, 653 https://doi.org/10.2514/8.8704
  5. Gavin, H., Johnson, Y., & McInnes, C. R. 1995, Advances in Astronautical Sciences, AAS 95-104, 2093
  6. Hull, D. G. 1997, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dyanmics, 20, 57 https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4033
  7. Lim, H. C., Bang, H. C., Park, K. D., & Park, P. H. 2003, JA&SS, 20, 365
  8. Onwubiko, C. 2000, Introduction to Engineering Design Optimization (New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.), pp.175-177
  9. Richards, A., Schouwenaars, T., How, J. P., & Ferson, E. 2002, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dyanmics, 25, 755 https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4943
  10. Sabol, C., Burns, R., & McLaughlin, C. A. 2001, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 38, 270 https://doi.org/10.2514/2.3681
  11. Singh, G., & Hadaegh, F. Y. 2001, AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, AIAA 2001-4088
  12. Tillerson, M., Inalhan, G., & How, J. 2002, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 12, 207 https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.683
  13. Yang, G., Yang, Q., Kapila, V., Palmer, D., & Vaidyanathan, R. 2002, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 12, 243 https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.684
  14. Wang, P. K. C., & Hadaegh, F. Y. 1998, AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit. AIAA 1998-4226

Cited by

  1. Fuel Optimization for Continuous-Thrust Orbital Rendezvous with Collision Avoidance Constraint vol.34, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.50996
  2. A Robust Adaptive Control Law for Satellite Formation Flying vol.39, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1874-1029(13)60015-4
  3. Minimum-Fuel Deployment for Spacecraft Formations via Optimal Control vol.31, pp.1, 2008, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.30364
  4. Quadratically Constrained Linear-Quadratic Regulator Approach for Finite-Thrust Orbital Rendezvous vol.35, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.56961
  5. On-line orbit planning and guidance for advanced upper stage pp.0002-2667, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-08-2018-0225