Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management (품질경영학회지)

Korean Society for Quality Management (한국품질경영학회)
권호 표지

Methodological Issues in Internet Survey and Development of Personalized Internet Survey System Using Data Mining Techniques

인터넷 설문조사의 방법론적인 문제점과 데이터마이닝 기법을 활용한 개인화된 인터넷설문조사 시스템의 구축

  • Published : 2004.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to summarize the methodological issues in internet survey and to suggest personalized internet survey system using data mining technique for enhancing the survey quality of internet survey as well as utilizing the benefit of interactive multimedia factors of internet survey. The data mining technique used in this paper is Case Based Reasoning for adopting individual design preference affecting survey quality. For achieving the research purpose, two surveys, pre & post survey, were performed. Pre survey was done for implementing CBR database to find individual index affecting survey quality and post survey was used for measuring the peformance of personalized internet survey system. The result shows that the survey quality of personalized web survey system is better than generalized web survey system.

Keywords

References

  1. 김광용 & 김기수 (1999a), '다양한 인터넷 설문 방식 비교와 설문만족에 관한 실증 연구', '한국경영정보학회 춘계학술논문집', pp. 181-190
  2. 김광용 & 김기수 (1999b), ,'웹 설문지 디자인과 작성률, 일관성에 관한 연구' '한국 분류학회 학술논문집', pp. 35-43
  3. Aamodt, A & Plaza. E, (1994), 'Case Based Reasoning: Foundational issues, Methodological Variations, and System Approaches', AI Communications, Vol. 7, No. 1. pp. 39-59
  4. Batagelj, Z & Vehovar, V, (1988), 'Technological and Methodological Issues In WWW Surveys', AAPOR98, Software and Methods for conducting Internet survys, St.Louis,
  5. Batagelj, Z. Vehovar, V. Lozar, K, (1999), 'Web vs. telephone surveys : An empirical study of mode effects and non response behaviour', JSM99 conference, Baltimore, Maryland
  6. Beniger, J. R. (1998), 'Presidential address : Survey and market research confront their futures on the World Wide Web', Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 329-354
  7. Couper, M. P. (2000), 'Web Surveys: review of issues and approaches', Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 64, No. 3, pp. 464-494 https://doi.org/10.1086/318641
  8. Couper, M. P., Traugott, M. W, and Lamias, M. J. (2001), 'Web Survey Design and Administration', Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 65, No. 2. pp. 230-253 https://doi.org/10.1086/322199
  9. Dillman, D. A., (2002), 'Navigating the rapid of change: some observations on survey methodology in the early 21 century', Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 66, No. 3. pp. 479-494
  10. Dillman, D.A, Tortora, R.D., & Bowker, D., (1998), 'Influence of Plain Vs. Fancy Design on Response Rates For Follow-up Web Surveys.', Proceeding of Survey Methods Section,Annual Meetings of the American Statistical association, dallass, Texas
  11. Epstein, J., Klinkenberg, W. D., Wiley, D., & McKinly, L. (2001), 'Insuaring sample equivalence and paper and pensil assessment', Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 339-346 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00002-4
  12. Faught, K. S., Green, K. W, and Whitten, D. (2004), 'Doing survey research on the internet', Journal of Computer Information System, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 26-34
  13. Feinberg, M. J. & Johnson, D., (1998), 'Designing and Developing Surveys on WWW Sites.', Communication of ACM, pp.38-42
  14. Furrer O. & Sudharshan D.(2001), 'Internet marketing research_ opportunities and problems,' Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, Volume 4 . Number 3 . 2001 . pp. 123-129
  15. Johnson, M. J. (2001), 'Digitizing Consumer Research,' Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 28, pp. 232-258
  16. Klassen, R. D. & Jacobs, J. (2001), 'Experimental Comaprison of Web, Electronic and mail survey in operations management', Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 713-718 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(01)00071-7
  17. Knapp, H. & Kirk, S. A. (2003), 'Using pensil and paper, Internet and touch tone phones for self administerd surveys: does methodology matter?', Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 117-134 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00008-0
  18. Krotki K. & Dennis M., (2001), 'Probability Based Survey Research on the Internet,' AAPOR conference paper
  19. Hayslett, M. M. & Wildemuth, B. M. (2004), 'Pixels or Pensils? The relative effectiveness of web-based versus paper surveys', Library & Information Science Research, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 73-93 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2003.11.005
  20. Porter, S. R. & Whitcomb, M. E. (2003), 'The Impact of Contact type on Web Survey Response Rates', Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 65, No. 4. pp. 579-588
  21. Schaefer & Dillman, 'Development of a Standard E-Mail Methodology : Results of an Experiment', Public Opinion Quarterly, 62. 1998
  22. Schillewaert, N, (1998), 'Non Probability Sampling for WWW Surveys : A Comparison of methods', The Journal of Market Research Society, vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 307-322
  23. Vehovar, V., Batagelj Z.,, Lozar K., & Zaletel M, (199), 'Design Aspect of the Web Questionnaires', the 10th Annual Advanced Techniques(ART) Forum(AMA)