Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제29권5호
  • /
  • Pages.446-453
  • /
  • 2004
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

네 가지 전동 Ni-Ti 파일의 danger zone에서의 근관성형력

Shaping Ability of Four Rotary Nickel-Titanium Instruments to Prepare Root Canal at Danger Zone

  • 최석동 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 진명욱 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 김기옥 (건국대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 김성교 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Choi, Seok-Dong (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Jin, Myoung-Uk (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Ok (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Kyo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • 발행 : 2004.09.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

하악 대구치 근심치근의 danger zone에서 수종의 전동 니켈-티타늄 파일의 근관성형력을 근관성형 전후 치질 두께의 변화를 측정하여 평가하고자 하였다. 기구에 따라 총 40개의 하악 대구치를 10개씩 $Profile^{\circledR}$, GT Rotary file, Quantec 및 ProTaper 4개 군으로 나누고 각 치아당 2개의 근관을 straight up-and-down과 anticurvature 군으로 나누어 근단부 근관을 모두 30번 크기로 일정하게 확대하였다. 수정된 Bramante법을 사용하였으며 술전 및 술후의 근관 상아질 두께를 치수저 하방 1, 3 및 5 mm지점에서 측정, 이원변량분석법으로 통계분석하였다. 모든 군의 danger zone과 safe zone에서의 straight up-and-down 동작과 anticurvature 동작 사이에는 치근상아질 두께변화에 현저한 차이를 나타내지 않았다 (p > 0.05). ProTaper는 danger zone과 safe zone 모두에서 다른 기구에 비해 많은 량의 근관상아질 삭제를 보였으며 특히 분지부 3 mm 수준에서 현저하였다(p < 0.05).

The aim of this study was to evaluate the shaping abilities of four different rotary nickel-titanium instruments with anticurvature motion to prepare root canal at danger zone by measuring the change of dentin thickness in order to have techniques of safe preparation of canals with nickel-titanium files. Mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals of forty mesial roots of extracted human lower molars were instrumented using the crown-down technique with ProFile, $GT^{TM}$ Rotary file, Quantec file and $ProTaper^{TM}$. In each root, one canal was prepared with a straight up-and-down motion and the other canal was with an anticurvature motion. Canals were instrumented until apical foramens were up to size of 30 by one operator. The muffle system was used to evaluate the root canal preparation. After superimposing the pre- and post-instrumentation canal. change in root dentin thickness was measured at the inner and outer sides of the canal at 1. 3, and 5 mm levels from the furcation. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA. Root dentin thickness at danger zone was significantly thinner than that at safe zone at all levels (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the change of root dentin thickness between the straight up-and-down and the anticurvature motions at both danger and safe zones in all groups (p > 0.05). ProTaper removed significantly more dentin than other files especially at furcal 3 mm level of danger and safe zones (p < 0.05) Therefore, it was concluded that anticurvature motion with nickel-titanium rotary instruments does not seem to be effective in danger zone of lower molars.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin Nor Am 18:269-296, 1974
  2. Buchanan LS. Paradigm shifts in cleaning and shaping. J Calf Dent Assoc 19:23-26, 28-33. 1991
  3. Kessler JR, Peters DD, Lorton L. Comparison of the relative risk of molar root perforations using various endodontic instrumentation techniques. J Endod 9:439, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(83)80260-X
  4. Goerig AC, Michelich RJ, Schultz H. Instrumentation of root canals in molar using step-down technique. J Endod 8:550-554, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(82)80015-0
  5. Bramante CM, Berber A, Borges RP. A methodology for evaluation of root canal instrumentation. J Endod 13:243-245, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(87)80099-7
  6. McCann JT, Keller DL, LaBounty GL. A modification of the muffle model system to study root canal morphology. J Endod 16:114-116, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81585-2
  7. Ruddle C. Cleaning and shaping the root canal system. p231-291. in Cohen S, Burns R. Pathways of the pulp. 8th ed, Mosby, St Louis, 2002
  8. Bower RC. Furcation morphology relative to periodontal treatment. J Periodontol 50:23-27, 1979 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1979.50.1.23
  9. Abou-Rass M, Frank AL, Glick DH. The anticurvature filing method to prepare the curved canal. J Am Dent Assoc 101:792-794, 1982
  10. Walia H, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod 14:346-351, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80196-1
  11. Kavanagh D, Lumley PJ. An in vitro evaluation of canal preparation using ProFile .04 and .06 taper instruments. Endod Dent Traumatol 14:16-20, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1998.tb00803.x
  12. Bryant ST, Dummer PM, Pitoni C, Bourba M, Moghal S. Shaping ability of .04 and .06 taper ProFile rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Int Endod J 32:155-164, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00256.x
  13. Park HS, Lee MK, Kim JJ, Lee JY. A study on the shape of a canal prepared with ProFiles in curved canal. J Kor Acad Conserv Dent 24:633-638, 1999
  14. Lee JH, Cho YB. The effect of some canal preparation techniques on the shape of root canals. J Kor Acad Conserv Dent 24:337-345, 1999
  15. Kum KY, Spangberg L, Cha BY, Jung IY, Lee SJ, Lee CY. Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals. J Endod 26:719-723, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200012000-00013
  16. Park H. A comparison of Greater Taper files, ProFiles, and stainless steel files to shape curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Dent Radiol Endod 91: 715-718, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2001.114159
  17. Short JA, Morgan LA, Baumgartner JC. A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation techniques. J Endod 23:503-507, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80310-X
  18. Isom TL, Marshall JG, Baumgartner JC. Evaluation of root thickness in curved canals after flaring. J Endod 21:368-371, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80972-6
  19. Grosson CR, Haller RH, Dove SB, Del Rio CE. A comparison of root canal preparation using NiTi hand. NiTi engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments. J Endod 21:173-176, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80560-1
  20. Yun HH, Kim SK. A comparison of the shaping abilities of four nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Dent Radiol Endod 95:228-233, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2003.92
  21. Portenier FL, Barbakow F. Preparation of the apical part of the root canal by the Lightspeed and step-back techniques. Int Endod J 31:103-111, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1998.00116.x

피인용 문헌

  1. Effect of anticurvature filing method on preparation of the curved root canal using ProFile vol.30, pp.4, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.4.327
  2. Change of working length in curved canals by various instrumentation techniques vol.31, pp.1, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.1.030