Journal of Korean Society of Transportation (대한교통학회지)

Korean Society of Transportation (대한교통학회)
권호 표지

Is Compact Urban Spatial Structure Effective for Public Transportation Mode?

컴팩트형 공간구조가 대중교통수단의 이용활성화에 보다 효과적인가?

  • Published : 2004.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find the characteristics of travel behavior and accessibility in terms of spatial structure. We analyzed travel behaviors and accessibility using a mode choice model and the Complementary Accessibility Index(CAI). The urban spatial structures that were compared were a compact city (CC) versus a sprawled city (SC), and high residential density districts (HD) versus low residential density districts (LD). First, CC and HDs residents had a shorter commuting distance than the CC and LDs residents. Second, behavior models showed that the use of Private cars for commuting in SCs was found to be greater than private car use in CCs, and that public transportation modes would be encouraged in CCs. Third, changes associated with the time and cost of commuting by private car generally affect the demand for public transportation modes in the CC. Also, analysis of cross elasticity suggests that changes of subway travel time affect the demand for buses very elastically. Fourth, the CAI of SC and LD were superior to the CC and HD even though the SC inefficient urban forms in terms of spatial structure. So, the spatial distribution of population density was also found to be an important factor affecting accessibility and energy savings.

본 연구는 도시공간구조와 통행행태 및 접근성 분석을 통하여 어떠한 형태의 도시구조가 대중교통의 활성화에 보다 적합한지를 모색하는 데 목적이 있다. 분석대상도시는 한국과 일본의 도시를 대상으로 하였으며 지구(district) 수준에까지 분석의 범위를 좁힘으로써 연구결과의 적용성을 높이고자 하였다. 비교분석구조로서 각 나라 및 도시에서 각각 컴팩트형도시 및 분산형도시, 고밀지구 및 저밀지구를 설정하였고, 통행행태분석은 로짓모형을 이용하였다. 또한 접근성지표(CAI)를 이용하여 주거공간분포에 따른 대중교통에의 접근성을 분석하였다. 분석결과, 첫째, 고밀도시 및 지구의 거주자가 보다 짧은 통근거리를 나타냈다. 둘째, 통근통행에 있어서 저밀지구의 거주자들이 훨씬 더 높은 자가용승용차의 이용율을 보이는 나타났다 셋째, 고밀도시에서 자가용승용차의 시간 및 비용에 대중교통의 교차탄력성이 저밀도시보다 큰 것으로 나타났다. 넷째, 접근성지표(CAI)의 분석결과, 대중교통으로의 접근성은 단순한 주거밀도보다는 밀도의 공간분포와 더 깊은 관련성을 갖는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Akimasa Fujiwara and Yoriyasu Sugie (2000), Prediction ACompact Cityuracy of Dynamic SP Models, 8th WCTR Proceedings, Vol3, pp.25-38.
  2. Ben-Akiva Moshe and Steven R. Lerman (1985). DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS:THEORY & APPLICATION TO TRAVEL DEMAND, MIT Press series in transportation studies;9
  3. Clark, C.(1951). 'Urban population densities', Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 114 : pp.490-496 https://doi.org/10.2307/2981088
  4. David A. Hensher and Jordan J. Louviere(2000), 'A Comparison of Elasticities Derived from Multinomial Logit, Nested and Heteroscedastic Extreme Value SP-RP Discrete Choice Models', 8th WCTR Proceedings. Vol3, pp.1-13.
  5. Ernie Scoffham and Brenda Vale(1996), 'How Compact is Sustainable-How Sustainable is Compact?', in The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form? edited by Mike Jenks et al, pp66-73
  6. Frans M. Dieleman, Martin J. Dijst and Tejo Spit(1999), 'Planning the Compact City:the Randstad Holland Experence', European Planning Studies, Vol.7, No.5, pp605-621 https://doi.org/10.1080/09654319908720541
  7. Gerorge Barrett(1996). 'The Transport Dimension'. in The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form? edited by Mike Jenks et al. pp.171-180.
  8. Gordon, P., H. Richardon, and Mvung-Jin. Jun(1991), 'The commuting paradox: Evidence from the top twenty', Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol.57, No.4, pp.416-417 https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369108975516
  9. John Black(1996), 'Higher Density Housing and Transport in Australian Cities in Transport', in Land Use and the Environment edited by Yoshitsugu Hayashi and John Roy, p.70
  10. Katie Williams, Elizabeth Burton and Mike Jenks (2000), 'Defining Sustainable Urban Form Introduction' in Achieving Sustainable Urban Form edited by Katie Williams at. el, E & FN Spon, p.8
  11. Lee, Jae-Yeong . Kim, Hyung-Chul(2002), 'Maxlmizing Energy Efficiency and Accessibility of Public Transportation in Compact City', The journal of Korean Planners Association, Vol.37, No.7, pp.231-244
  12. Moshe E. Ben-Akiva ; Steven R. Lerman (1976), 'A Behavioral Analysis of Automobile Ownership and Mode of Travel' : Volume 3 - Technical Report, U.S. Department of Transportation
  13. Paul M., Torrens and Marina Alberti(2000), 'Measuring sprawled', Centre for advanced Spatial analysis working paper series, p.27, www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/working papers.htm
  14. ISatorou Hino, Kunihiro Kishi and Keiichi Satoh(2000) -'Development of the complementary accessibility index and evaluation of public transportation system', The journal of Japanese Planners Association, vol.35, pp.475-480
  15. Songnam city(1996-9), Songnam Statistical Yearbook, Songnam Korea
  16. Songnam city(2000), Transportation Master Plan of Songnam, Songnam Korea
  17. Stuart Farthing, John Winter and Tessa Coombes (1996), 'Travel behavior and local aCompact Cityessibilitv to services and facilities', in The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form? edited by Mike Jenks et al, pp.181-189
  18. WCED(1987), Our common future
  19. Willam P. Anderson, Pavlos S. Kanaroglou and Eric J. Miller(1996), 'Urban Form, Energy and the Environment: A Review of Issues, Envidence and Policy', Urban Studies, Vol.33, No.1, pp.7-35 https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989650012095
  20. Yoon. In-Ha . Kim, Ho-Yeon(2003), 'A Study on Commuting Patterns in Seoul Metropolitan Area, 1990-1996', The journal of Korean Planners Association, Vol.38, No.6, pp.87-98