DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

RHEOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF COMPOSITES USING A VERTICAL OSCILLATION RHEOMETER

수직 진동형 Rheometer를 이용한 복합레진의 유변학적 성질의 측정

  • Lee, In-Bog (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Cho, Byung-Hoon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Son, Ho-Hyun (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Tag (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Um, Chung-Moon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 이인복 (서울대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 조병훈 (서울대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 손호현 (서울대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 이상탁 (서울대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 엄정문 (서울대학교 치과대학 보존학교실)
  • Published : 2004.11.01

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the viscoelastic properties related to handling characteristics of composite resins, Methods: A custom designed vertical oscillation rheometer (VOR) was used for rheological measurements of composites. The VOR consists of three parts: (1) a measuring unit, (2) a deformation induction unit and (3) a force detecting unit, Two medium viscous composites, Z100 and Z250 and two packable composites, P60 and SureFil were tested. The viscoelastic material function, including complex modulus $E^{*}$ and phase angle ${\delta}$, were measured. A dynamic oscillatory test was used to evaluate the storage modulus (E'), loss modulus (E") and loss tangent ($tan{\delta}$) of the composites as a function of frequency ($\omega$) from 0.1 to 20 Hz at $23^{\circ}C$. Results: The E' and E" increased with increasing frequency and showed differences in magnitude between brands. The $E^{*}s$ of composites at ${\omega}{\;}={\;}2{\;}Hz$, normalized to that of Z100, were 2.16 (Z250), 4,80 (P60) and 25.21 (SureFil). The magnitudes and patterns of the change of $tan{\delta}$ of composites with increasing frequency were significantly different between brands. The relationships between the complex modulus $E^{*}$, the phase angle ${\delta}$ and the frequency \omega were represented by frequency domain phasor form, $E^{*}{\;}(\omega){\;}={\;}E^{*}e^{i{\delta}}{\;}={\;}E^{*}{\angle}{\delta}$. Conclusions: The viscoelasticity of composites that influences handling characteristics is significant different between brands, The VOR is a relatively simple device for dynamic, mechanical analysis of high viscous dental composites. The locus of frequency domain phasor plots in a complex plane is a valuable method of representing the viscoelastic properties of composites.

Keywords

References

  1. Craig RG & Powers JM. Restorative dental materials 11th ed., Mosby co.. p91-98, 231-251. 2002
  2. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ, et al. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 129:567-577, 1998 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0274
  3. Leinfelder KF, Prasad A. A new condensable composite for the restoration of posterior teeth. Dent Today 17(2):112-116, 1998
  4. Leinfelder KF, Radz GM, Nash RW. A report on a new condensable composite resin. Compendium 19(3): 230-237. 1998
  5. Opdam NJM , Roeters JJM, Peters TCRB, et al. ? Consistency of resin composites for posterior use. Dent Mater 12:350-354, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80045-5
  6. Ferracane JL, Moser JB, Greener EH. Rheology of composite restoratives. J Dent Res 60(9): 1678-1685, 1981 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345810600090801
  7. Tyas MJ, Jones DW, Rizkalla AS. The evaluation of resin composite consistency. Dent Mater 14:424-428, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00017-2
  8. Al-sharaa KA, Watts DC. Stickiness prior to setting of some light cured resin composites. Dent Mater 19:182-187, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00097-0
  9. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braaem M, et al. A classification of dental composites according to their morphological and mechanical characteristics. Dent Mater 8:310-319, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90106-M
  10. Duran RL, Powers JM, Craig RG. Viscoelastic and dynamic properties of soft liners and tissue conditioners. J Dent Res 58(8):1801-1807, 1979 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345790580080601
  11. Goldberg AJ. Viscoelastic properties of silicon. polysulfide, and polyether impression materials. J Dent Res 53(5):1033-39, 1974 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345740530050301
  12. Watt DC. Elastic moduli and visco-elastic relaxation. J Dent22:154-158, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(94)90199-6
  13. McCabe JF, Bowman AJ. The rheological properties of dental impression materials. Brit dent J 151:179, 1981 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4804651
  14. Jacobsen PH, Whiting R, Richardson PCA. Viscosity of setting anterior restorative materials. Brit dent J 143:393, 1977 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4804011
  15. Braden M. Viscosity and consistency of impression rubbers. J Dent Res 46(2) :429-433, 1967 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345670460022001
  16. Barnes HA, Hutton JF, Walters K. An introduction to rheology. Elsevier Science Publishing co. 1989
  17. 문탁진. 유변학. 1st ed., 민음사, p7-80, 190-195, 1988
  18. 김상용. 고분자물리학. 2nd ed., 서울대학교출판부, p7-26, 1994
  19. Lee IE, Son HH, Um CM. Rheological Properties of flowable, conventional hybrid, and condensable composite resins. Dent Mater 19:298-307, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00058-1
  20. Kim JW, Cho MS, Choi HJ, et al. Electrorheological fluid characterization via a vertical oscollation rheometer. Polymer test 20: 913-918, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9418(01)00020-4
  21. Cho MS, Choi YJ, Choi SG, et al. Viscoelasticity of an electrorheological fluid using a vertical oscillation rheometer. J Mole liquid 75: 13-24, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7322(97)00024-X
  22. 현재천 외. 유변학의 이론과 응용. 1st ed., 한국유변학회, p239-237, 2001

Cited by

  1. Effect of instrument compliance on the polymerization shrinkage stress measurements of dental resin composites vol.34, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.2.145